Jewish World Review Oct. 22, 2002/ 16 Mar-Cheshvan, 5763

Marianne M. Jennings

Marianne M. Jennings
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Nobel Prizes and other ventriloquist acts


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | From his pronunciation of "NOO- KYUH- LUHR" to that sweater he wore because he kept the White House at 68 degrees rather than solve the energy crisis, Jimmy Carter was ineffectual. Even his recreational activities were marginal. He passed out while jogging and claimed a gigantic rabbit attacked him as he fished. The media types gave the latter short shrift because they didn't see a story, most having experienced similar large fauna visions of many species whilst inhaling or "experimenting."

Mr. Carter used the tool of all weak presidents - world peace through meditation with thugs. So long as there are rogues in the world, there cannot be peace without moral absolutes and military strength. In fact, despots seek out charismatic doofs, ala Carter, and court them precisely because they know a huff, a puff, or a promise appeases them. Carter defends Castro and now assures that Hussein is not as bad as Bush alleges.

Recently released Kremlin documents and transcripts reveal that Khrushchev feared Nixon and Gorbachev feared Reagan. Khrushchev did not fear Kennedy and, in fact, manipulated him via the Cuban missile crisis. What liberals have long perceived as a Kennedy coup was a throwaway by Khrushchev, who then went about building the Iron Curtain and Soviet bloc. Kennedy was unwilling to confront Khrushchev, leaving his successors a mess, "It seems particularly stupid to risk killing a million Americans over an argument about access rights on the Autobahn." Nixon was handed Kennedy's half-baked Southeast Asia and Reagan mopped up the Soviets, "the roughnecks in the Kremlin," as he called them during Kennedy's bungled foreign policy.

Nobelers love Carter because he loves Arafat, North Korea, and Hussein. Nobelers trust Arafat, North Korea, and Hussein because of a camaraderie born of mutual US resentment. Nobel Committee fools delight the Arafats, Husseins, and bin Ladens, who watch from afar as those giving and receiving peace prizes defend them and denounce the US. The Nobel Committee and Carter have climbed into bed with thugs. They do so in the name of peace, but the result is increased terrorist resolve and standing.

Mr. Clinton, Ms. Albright, and a host of State Department employees cringed at Mr. Bush's clumping of North Korea into the "axis of evil." Guess what? They do have NOO-KYUH-LUHR weapons after all. While Clinton was Nobel-negotiating and Carter provided Nobelesque support, the North Koreans tinkered away with plutonium, snickering at gullible presidential marionettes who gave them a free pass for a Nobel.

The most irritating aspect of Mr. Carter's Nobel is Bill Clinton's renewed vigor. Until Carter's win, Mr. Clinton had surrendered hope, vis--vis the Nobel. He led a full life, he and his sax, playing at the opening of Indian casinos in upstate New York and purchasing thong bikinis in Rio. Surely these are two acts of Nobel preclusion. But, nay! Clinton will begin anew with post-presidency sojourns to Havana, Palestine, and other homes of cowards who trample human rights and dignity. Oslo or bust!

The Nobel committee lauds affable parrots who befriend and defend tyrants and rebuke the United States. To use an iconic term of the left - is this agenda so difficult to see? The Nobel Committee's transparency is an affront. They have crossed yet another line, now using the prize to shape current U.S. policy. Mr.Carter long ago ignored the historical deference of past presidents in not criticizing successors. By accepting the award, he now inserts himself back into the presidency. Mr. Carter should denounce the award, but won't. The Committee knows that; that's why they chose him.

Most revealing about the Nobel Peace Prize agenda is who hasn't won. Ronald Reagan. The man who ended the cold war never won a Nobel. Gorby did. George Bush I brought a swift end to the crisis in Kuwait with an international coalition. No Nobel. Nixon ended Vietnam - no Nobel. They gave it to an aide, Kissinger, and a Politburo hack, Le Duc Tho, who had the good sense to decline the silly thing.

The stunning bias amongst historians and those in charge of honors, awards, and recognitions is troublesome. During the week that Carter won his Nobel, a new edition of Bartlett's Quotations appeared. Justin Kaplan, editor, explained that he was adding Reagan quotes after excluding him completely from the last edition, "I admit I was carried away with prejudice." Imagine excluding, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"

There is nothing from current President Bush, "There is nothing presidential about him," offers Mr. Kaplan. Perhaps next edition when he admits his bias? Nobel rebukes and Bartlett's shunning are the real honors. Clinton has six quotes in the current Bartlett's, including "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."

Not being quoted and not being awarded a Nobel mean that you are presidential, that you have done your job. It means you have been carrying the water for those who tote the Nobel. Carter and Clinton are busy with accolades, teaching the world to sing in peace and harmony even as the baritone thugs build their arsenals and prepare to launch.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Marianne M. Jennings is a professor of legal and ethical studies at Arizona State University. Send your comments by clicking here.

Up

10/17/02:The window on the liberal mind and war
10/14/02: Leaders don't change; followers do
10/07/02: Do it yourself
09/27/02: Hosers rise again
09/20/02: Girly gridiron
09/13/02: Erudite buffoons
09/11/02: One year later, crass demands, greed, and litigation are back --- but rights are diminished
09/06/02: Public schools: An unqualified success
08/30/02: The Shakespearean tragedy of affirmative action
08/23/02: Hollywood Joe's admission
08/15/02: Cheapskates
08/08/02: Ode to a coal miner
08/02/02: Sarah Brady's gun gift
07/26/02: Don't do it, Tiger
07/18/02: Reality Muppets
07/09/02: We're all going to die, live with it
07/02/02: From the eye of the storm
06/27/02: Nick not right
06/20/02: Behind the music
06/14/02: The sum of all fears in vouchers
06/06/02: Where was Agent Rowley when the FBI needed her?
05/30/02: Of big hair and sanity
05/24/02: Should I embrace liberalism?
05/20/02: Some passion about Israel
05/09/02: A mother who cares enough
05/02/02: Go ahead, pass judgment
04/29/02: The irritation of the modern wedding
04/18/02: Claire's life
04/15/02: Harvard takes off its pants one leg at a time
04/09/02: The Clinton legacy: Politics of personal destruction
03/31/02: Oscars' subtle bigotry was embarrassing
03/22/02: Blame Oprah, Rosie, Sally, Ted, David
03/14/02: The costs of women's feeble choices
03/08/02: Botoxic faces
02/28/02: The dangers of organized philanthropy
02/25/02: Don't take the gold
02/14/02: Ease up on the brothers and sisters
02/11/02: Because I was courted
02/05/02: Fat fault
01/24/02: Tolerance does not mean stupidity
01/17/02: Too old too soon
01/10/02: Ethically challenged firms
01/03/02: The year that was
12/27/01: The Twelve Days of inconsistency
12/20/01: Free Speech and the political spectrum
12/13/01: Curbing brats
12/06/01: Power to influence
11/29/01: The disappearing art of grading
11/21/01: The Big Two-Five
11/13/01: You can never find a lib when you need one
11/01/01: Unlucky in sports
10/26/01: An epidemic of counselitis
10/16/01: A touch of class
10/12/01: Of human nature and monsters
10/05/01: Sensitive man
10/01/01: Post-September 11 security
09/20/01: No tinhorn terrorists can frighten us
09/06/01: If there is no honor in youth sports, it is because of the adults
08/27/01: The draw of Condit
08/23/01: Lowering expectations and flying high
08/17/01: Thoreau, Walden and stems cells
08/13/01: Our masters: The animals
08/02/01: FRAN, MARY JO, MONICA & CHANDRA
07/30/01: When principle hits too close to home
07/13/01: Rage born of sublimation
07/06/01: Patient's rights and the Valley of Death
06/29/01: There is no excuse
06/21/01: I want an eternal soulmate, but the marriage thing is another issue
06/14/01: Which way maverick McCain? An Arizonan's perspective
06/07/01: No stroke of genius
05/30/01: The lesson of the Mr. Green Jeans senator: 'Moderate' is a classy term for wishy-washy
05/25/01: Baseball has not been so good to me
05/18/01: Clothes make the woman
05/11/01: Selective precaution
05/04/01: Grades: Equality of students, by students, for the students
04/27/01: The Horowitz revelations as seen by a college professor
04/20/01: First, let's kill all the tests
04/13/01: The continuing mistake of underpricing electricity
04/06/01: That pill, Julia Roberts
03/29/01: If it weren't for the parents, we might accomplish something
03/23/01: The melt down of the academy
03/15/01: Columbine redux: Moral infants
03/09/01: The lessons of Tom and Nicole
03/01/01: Pardon the temporary outrage
02/23/01: In defense of homework
02/20/01: A Message for faith-based organizations: Don't take the money, just run
02/06/01: Enough already with the Clintoons
01/26/01: The challenge to be better than we have been
01/19/01: Where have you gone Frieda Pushnik?
12/29/00: The year that was
12/23/00: Litigation: It's the American way
12/15/00: In defense of rhetoric
12/06/00: The company we keep: Lawyers and elections
12/01/00: Liberals' art of trashing of women
11/20/00: Put me out of my misery
11/17/00: On being a statesman
11/13/00: When it's broke, fixing it wouldn't offend the Framers
11/08/00: ELECTION 2000: I SURRENDER
10/27/00: Al in the package? Memo to women: Choosing presidents and husbands
10/20/00: Ten things the gay community should understand
10/13/00: "You Have a Lump."
10/06/00: The government as the pharmacy: Don't
09/29/00: The capacity for truth
09/22/00: Charity with strings and an agenda
09/15/00: The taming of the shrew: Gloria Steinem takes a husband
09/09/00: Why rich folk don't bother me none
08/28/00: Survival of the not-so-fit but conniving
08/25/00: Conventions: A study in contrasts
08/18/00: Resenting the accusations of racial prejudice
08/04/00: Women: Their own worst enemy
07/21/00: Hillary: Our longshoreman First Lady
07/21/00: SUVs: The root of all evil
07/14/00: The basketball gene and white men not jumping so well
07/07/00: I wanna be around
06/23/00: The liberal conversion
06/14/00: Sex and the City: The shallow but vulgar female
06/08/00: No excuses schools
06/02/00: Oh, Canada: Our Nutty Neighbors to the North
05/23/00: The new mollycoddling coach
05/16/00: On adultery and leadership
05/12/00: Taking your lumps
05/02/00: Elian: There's never a liberal around when you need one
04/25/00: Life's circle and tenderness
04/18/00: Womyn who want it both ways
04/11/00: The monsters we're raising with the ergo proposition
04/05/00: Endowing the Hooters Chair for Literature Appreciation
03/28/00: Dr. Laura: The passive/aggressive kid's mom
03/21/00: Dough and campaigns
03/14/00: The volunteerism of conscription and pomp
03/07/00: Hope and pray that religion remains a force in politics
02/29/00: Ditzes in TV Land
02/22/00: Cranky nitpickers make writing a [sic] experience
02/15/00: Those chameleon 60s activists
02/08/00: McCandidate McCain: Flirting with principles
02/01/00: The demise of marriage
01/25/00: Stroke of the pen, law of the land: Clinton's Camelot
01/18/00: Off the Rocker Rorschach Test
01/11/00: Oprah's lemmings
01/04/00: Struggling mightily amidst the comfort
12/23/99: Confused fathers
12/14/99: Drop-kicking the homeless
12/07/99: Turtles and teamsters, side-by-side in Seattle
11/29/99: When conservatives behave badly
11/22/99: Compassionate conservative: Timing and targets
11/18/99: The elusive human spirit and accountability
11/11/99: Succumbing to the intellectual child within with the help of crackpots and screwballs
10/28/99: Live by litigation, die by litigation
10/22/99: Jesse, Warren, Cybill, Donald and Oprah
10/14/99: Inequality and injustice: It's the big one
10/05/99: Dan Quayle, morals and schoolyard bullies
09/30/99: The monsters of epidermal parenting
09/21/99: The Diversity Hoax
09/15/99: Waco Wackos
09/09/99: Selective censorship
09/01/99: The village, the children, judicial imperialism and abortion
08/24/99: Naughty Newt?
08/17/99: In defense of Boy Scouts and judgment
08/10/99: Ruining the finest health care system in the world
08/03/99: Nihilism and politics: ethics on the lam
07/26/99: Of women, soccer and removed jerseys
07/23/99: Not in despair, a mere mortal doing just fine
07/20/99: "Why me?" How about "Why us?"
07/13/99: Bunk, junk & juries
07/06/99: An Amish woman in a Victoria's Secret store
06/30/99: That intellectually embarrassing Second Amendment
06/24/99: Patricia Ireland eat your heart out --- but check out the recipe in 'women's mags' first
06/22/99: Dems and the Creator coup
06/17/99: True courage is more than just admitting troubles

© 2002, Marianne M. Jennings