|
Jewish World Review /Dec. 2,1998 /13 Kislev 5759
Mona Charen
Dangerous ground
IT IS A LUCKY THING that Jack Kevorkian is such a ghoul. If he looked and sounded like
Marcus Welby, the movement for euthanasia would have made much more significant progress than
it has.
Is "ghoul" too strong a word? Only those who haven't had the pleasure of viewing Kevorkian's
artwork would flinch from that description. One of his paintings, titled "Very Still Life,"
features, in The New York Times account of his show a couple of years ago, "a blue flower
blossoming though the gaping eye socket of a skull with a twisted lower jaw." Another
painting depicts a severed head, blood dripping from the neck. The hands holding the head are
Nazi on one side and Turkish on the other.
This is not the imagination, it seems safe to say, of your run-of-the-mill humanitarian.
Some may wonder why, in his latest defiance of the Michigan law banning assisted suicide on
CBS' "60 Minutes," Kevorkian decided to deliver the poison himself rather than let the
suicide pull the string that would release the deadly chemicals.
The answer is that Kevorkian is after far more than simply challenging the assisted suicide
law. That's old hat. He has already "assisted" more than 100 people to kill themselves, and
the authorities in Michigan have been able to do little about it. Three juries have acquitted
him.
No, Kevorkian's goal is larger than that. His is a eugenics project. He would like to see
those with disabilities, those who are ill and those who are troubled eliminated, preferably
by their own hands but by his or others' if necessary. "The voluntary self-elimination of
individual and mortally diseased or crippled lives," Kevorkian once wrote, "taken
collectively, can only enhance the preservation of public health and welfare."
It is sound prosecution for the authorities in Michigan to indict Kevorkian. But much more
important is for the society that imagines he is opening a "dialogue" on the treatment of the
terminally ill and the nature of autonomy to think again.
Many support Kevorkian out of the mistaken belief that his is the only answer to
machine-prolonged, painful deaths with tubes and wires doing the work of our hearts, lungs
and kidneys for weeks or even months.
There are two answers to this. The first is that the
more widespread use of living wills -- in which a healthy person specifies ahead of time in a
legally binding document what extraordinary measures he desires or rejects if he becomes
incapacitated -- has reduced the numbers of people subjected to such suffering. The second is
the alternative of hospice care.
In the face of a terminal illness, millions of Americans choose hospice, or palliative care,
over traditional therapy. The purpose of a hospice is to make the patient as comfortable as
possible -- physically, psychically and spiritually -- at the end of life. That is the humane
answer to suffering, not a shove into the grave. Dr. Kathleen Foley, a pain specialist at
Sloan Kettering Medical Center in New York, has noted that once patients' pain is under
control, requests for death diminish drastically.
Think hard, think very hard, before endorsing assisted suicide or euthanasia. It isn't as
simple as helping those who can look forward to nothing but weeks or months of pain and
agony. One of Kevorkian's victims, Rebecca Badger, a 39-year-old woman who came to him
claiming to have multiple sclerosis, turned out not to have been sick at all, at least not
physically. The coroner found no evidence of MS.
Others of those Kevorkian has hurried to the cemetery were ill, but not terminally. All, it
is safe to say, were depressed. One of the women Kevorkian euthanized had been beaten by her
husband in the week preceding her request for suicide. Some of his "patients" are dead within
24 hours of laying eyes on him. Is that time enough to establish anything?
This is very dangerous ground, ripe for abuse. The blinkered endorsement of "autonomy" will
come at the expense of compassion, justice and
In yet another painting, titled "Paralysis," Kevorkian rendered a man whose brain and spinal
cord have been ripped from his body and hang above him from chains.
Kevorkian
I11/30/98: Involuntary fatherhood?
11/24/98: Lies, damned lies, and sex lies
11/18/98: Another victory for cowardice
11/16/98: Separatism plus welfarism equals a dead end
11/10/98: Did conservatism lose campaign '98?
11/06/98: Democrat venality, Republican timidity
11/04/98: Are girls being shortchanged?
11/02/98: Believe the children?
10/28/98: What 'Measure 58' would do
10/26/98: The officers are bailing out
10/20/98: Using Matthew Shepard's murder
10/19/98: The school voucher that saved a family
10/14/98: Are powerful women different?
10/09/98: Can just sex be impeachable?
10/07/98: Repeal Miranda
10/02/98: Understanding the polls
10/01/98: What school texts teach about marriage
9/28/98: Fear of choice
9/23/98: A fork in the road: Bubba's fate and ours
9/18/98: Christianity and the Holocaust
9/16/98: The national dirty joke
9/11/98: Are we in crisis?
9/09/98: Does Burton's sin let Clinton off the hook?
9/07/98: Liar's Poker
9/01/98: One, two, three
8/28/98: Fat and folly
8/25/98: When homework is a dirty word
8/21/98: The unravelling
8/18/98: The wages of dishonesty
8/17/98: Sex, honor and the presidency
8/12/98: Pro-choice extremist
8/10/98: Switch illuminates biology's role
8/05/98: The presumption of innocence and the American way
8/03/98: An American hero
7/29/98: Lock up those who need psychiatric care
7/24/98: Making the military more like us
7/22/98: The 'Net sex hoax... and us
7/20/98: Disappointed by Cosbys
7/15/98: Feelings, not morality, rule
7/10/98: Guns as the solution?
7/8/98: Teacher preacher
7/6/98: The China behind the headlines
7/1/98: What is the First Amendment for?
6/26/98: The Republican city
6/24/98: Poison pen
6/22/98: Clinton: inventing his own reality?
6/16/98: Senator mom?
6/12/98: Wisconsin: a trail blazer?
6/9/98: These girls say no to sex, yes to excellence
6/5/98: Lewinsky's ex-lawyer would feel right at home as Springer guest
6/2/98: English? Si; Republican? No!
5/29/98: The truth about women and work
5/27/98: Romance in the '90s
5/25/98:Taxing smokers for fun and profit
5/19/98: China's friend in the White House
5/15/98: Look out feminists: here comes the true backlash
5/12/98: The war process?
5/8/98: Where's daddy?
5/5/98: The joys of boys
5/1/98: Republicans move on education reform
4/28/98: Reagan was right
4/24/98: The key to Pol Pot
4/21/98: The patriot's channel
4/19/98: Child-care day can't replace mom
4/15/98: Tax time
4/10/98: Armey states obvious, gets clobbered
4/7/98: A nation complacent?
4/1/98: Bill Clinton's African adventure
3/27/98: Understanding Arkansas
3/24/98: Jerry Springer's America
3/20/98: A small step for persecuted minorities
3/17/98: Skeletons in every closet?
3/13/98: Clinton's idea of a fine judge
3/10/98: Better than nothing?
3/6/98: Of fingernails and freedom
3/3/98: Read JWR! :0)
2/27/98: Dumb and Dumber
2/24/98: Reagan reduced poverty more than Clinton
2/20/98: Rally Round the United Nations?
2/17/98: In Denial
2/13/98: Reconsidering Theism
2/10/98: Waiting for the facts?
2/8/98: Cat got the GOP's tongue?
2/2/98: Does America care about immorality?
1/30/98: How to judge Clinton's denials
1/27/98: What If It's Just the Sex?
1/23/98: Bill Clinton, Acting Guilty
1/20/98: Arafat and the Holocaust Museum
1/16/98: Child Care or Feminist Agenda?
1/13/98: What We Really Think of Abortion
1/9/98: The Dead Era of Budget Deficits Rises Again?
1/6/98: "Understandable" Murder and Child Custody
1/2/98: Majoring in Sex
12/30/97: The Spirit of Kwanzaa
12/26/97: Food fights (Games children play)
12/23/97: Does Clinton's race panel listen to facts?
12/19/97: Welcome to the Judgeocracy, where the law school elite overrules majority rule
12/16/97: Do America's Jews support Netanyahu?