|
Mona Charen
The patriot's channel
A CALLER TO C-SPAN a few months ago said the following: "Brian, in Japan, they have a
tradition of naming extremely important individuals as 'national treasures.' If the U.S.
were to institute such a policy, the first person to be so honored should be Brian
Lamb."
Brian Lamb, founder and leading light of C-SPAN, is a national
treasure. His network does more to inform and enlighten the American electorate on
matters of political and civic importance than anything else in the whole modern maze
of television.
In part, that is because C-SPAN, unlike all of its electronic media competitors, is
religiously devoted to the printed word. On the morning journal program, for example,
viewers are asked to do exactly what the guests do: select stories from their daily
newspapers and discuss them. C-SPAN sternly discourages the kind of calls other
networks welcome -- the "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anymore" type.
Lamb and the other judicious C-SPAN hosts turn the callers back to the newspapers,
back to facts, back to words.
C-SPAN assiduously cultivates utter impartiality -- and succeeds to a remarkable
degree. Lamb is beloved by liberals and conservatives alike because they perceive him
to be scrupulously fair. Naturally, because he deals with the public and because he
dwells on political matters, Lamb also comes in for a fair amount of abuse from the
kook and crackpot brigades. They phone in with regularity to upbraid him for giving too
much time to their enemies and not enough time to their friends. The right-wing and
left-wing nuts spew equal amounts of venom -- and their foolishness is revealed starkly
by their chosen target. If you are paranoid enough to believe that Brian Lamb -- Brian
Lamb! -- is biased or unjust, then you should be phoning a psychiatrist, not a talk show.
In a media world of bitter partisanship and division, Brian Lamb's unflappable
impartiality is something of a work of art. So is his patriotism.
C-SPAN is a celebration of democracy. It is based on the notion that an informed
electorate will have the wisdom to make good decisions. C-SPAN is the enemy of
self-dealing, corruption and all forms of insiderism. If there is an unspoken theme of
C-SPAN's coverage, it is reveal, reveal, reveal. Lamb always asks who owns what. He
asks who is married to whom. He rarely fails to mention where someone used to work
and who his or her parents are if it is relevant.
C-SPAN has taken its cameras into every corner of the world of government, from
congressional offices doing ordinary constituent service to New Hampshire breakfasts
where presidential aspirants test their stump speeches. The watchful C-SPAN eye has
covered every political convention. Yes, Republicans and Democrats certainly. But also
Libertarians, American Communists and anybody else who can claim a spot on the
ballot.
C-SPAN isn't just about Washington, and it isn't just about government. It, like its
founder, is in love with America. The C-SPAN school busses, which range over the
whole country, offer peeks into interesting historical sites, grand natural beauty and
ordinary classrooms. The Alexis de Tocqueville Tour revisited every stop of the famous
chronicler's 1830s visit.
And while the network constantly reminds us of our past, it has stayed on the cutting
edge with a very sophisticated web site that can hyperlink faster than I can log on.
On Sunday evening, Lamb hosts the best interview program on television, "Booknotes,"
an hour-long talk with authors of political or historical works. You can then read the first
chapter of all books featured on the program on the C-SPAN web site.
There are some cable companies that discipline wayward customers by putting
C-SPAN on every channel when the bill has not been paid. How droll. But how insulting
to a channel that does so much to enhance our appreciation of the ongoing American
experiment.
Brian Lamb is a very modest man who will cringe to read these words. If I had told him
of my intent to praise him in print, he would have found a million arguments against the
idea. So, I didn't call him. You can't always consult national
4/19/98: Child-care day can't replace mom
4/15/98: Tax time
4/10/98: Armey states obvious, gets clobbered
4/7/98: A nation complacent?
4/1/98: Bill Clinton's African adventure
3/27/98: Understanding Arkansas
3/24/98: Jerry Springer's America
3/20/98: A small step for persecuted minorities
3/17/98: Skeletons in every closet?
3/13/98: Clinton's idea of a fine judge
3/10/98: Better than nothing?
3/6/98: Of fingernails and freedom
3/3/98: Read JWR! :0)
2/27/98: Dumb and Dumber
2/24/98: Reagan reduced poverty more than Clinton
2/20/98: Rally Round the United Nations?
2/17/98: In Denial
2/13/98: Reconsidering Theism
2/10/98: Waiting for the facts?
2/8/98: Cat got the GOP's tongue?
2/2/98: Does America care about immorality?
1/30/98: How to judge Clinton's denials
1/27/98: What If It's Just the Sex?
1/23/98: Bill Clinton, Acting Guilty
1/20/98: Arafat and the Holocaust Museum
1/16/98: Child Care or Feminist Agenda?
1/13/98: What We Really Think of Abortion
1/9/98: The Dead Era of Budget Deficits Rises Again?
1/6/98: "Understandable" Murder and Child Custody
1/2/98: Majoring in Sex
12/30/97: The Spirit of Kwanzaa
12/26/97: Food fights (Games children play)
12/23/97: Does Clinton's race panel listen to facts?
12/19/97: Welcome to the Judgeocracy, where the law school elite overrules majority rule
12/16/97: Do America's Jews support Netanyahu?