Where is your happy place? Maybe it's Slovenia

Most residents of rich, Western countries have relatively high earnings, but many also feel they can't afford a reasonable lifestyle. Americans, for example, are getting richer but also more unhappy. Meanwhile Eastern Europeans, not generally known for their cheery disposition, are most satisfied with their comparatively lower income.

In 2018, research psychologists at Purdue and the University of Virginia compiled data from previous surveys to estimate how much income people needed to be happy. They found that, even after adjusting for purchasing power, people needed more money in richer countries. Recently the same data was adjusted for inflation and compared to average earnings in each country.

Residents of Eastern European countries tend to earn at least 70% of what they think they need to be happy, though it also does not take so much to feel satisfied. Slovenians are the most content with their earnings: Theirs is the only country included in the study where average annual earnings ($42,800) exceed the amount they think they need for a good life ($36,800). One of the few Western countries where people earn more than 70% of what they think they need to feel happy is Luxembourg. The countries where people are most stretched are New Zealand, the UK and Australia, where earnings only cover about one third of what it costs to be happy.

Of course, happiness is subjective. But what comes through in this research is that the affordability crisis is not just an American phenomenon, nor can it be solved by more government spending. In Sweden, for example, affordability is at least as big an issue as it is in the US, and like in the US one of the main culprits is housing. Many Western countries have building restrictions and rent controls that make buying housing more expensive.

The other problem, if I can call it that, may just be rising prosperity. As countries get richer, living standards increase — maybe faster than incomes do. It is worth noting that the countries that fall the most short on this "affordable happiness" scale tend to be in Latin America, which feature low levels of both desired and actual income. Again, the point is not that people in richer countries aren't happier — in general, they are — but that the gains from happiness don't keep up with rising income.

The original paper also finds diminishing happiness returns to income, and then actual negative returns: People become happier as they start to earn more, but at a certain point they start becoming less happy as their income rises. The explanation, the authors speculate, could be that once someone's basic needs are met, they become more focused on material goals and social comparisons. Even in Denmark — one of the happiest nations in the world, according to a separate (annual) survey with different methodology — average annual income covers only 66.8% of what people say they need to feel happy.

Capitalism may have made hundreds of millions of people rich and delivered more material wealth than the world has ever seen, but it also moved the goalposts. And market distortions that created shortages and increased prices over the last several years caused a cost-of-living crisis that still afflicts most rich countries.

One tempting conclusion from this research is that we'd all be happier with a simpler, less materialistic life. But this would be the wrong lesson. The desire for more also accelerates progress and contributes to rising living standards. Perhaps some Kiwis would be happier if they moved to Slovenia and experienced a lower cost-of-living on their New Zealand wages. But they might not be so happy if they suddenly got paid like Slovenians.

A better lesson is that it pays to remove the distortions to commerce and economic activity that drive up prices. Nearly all the richer countries where people aren't earning enough to be happy also face aging populations and big debts, and growth in a lot of Europe is stagnant. That means things could soon get even more expensive — just as a lot of people are getting poorer.

Allison Schrager is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering economics. A senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, she is author of "An Economist Walks Into a Brothel: And Other Unexpected Places to Understand Risk."

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Allison Schrager, a Bloomberg columnist, is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor of City Journal.

Previously:
• Gen Z is mistaking sports betting for investing
• Americans Are Richer Than Ever. Why Are They So Angry?
• Government intervention is often the cause of 'market failures', not the remedy for them<
• Reality of math is catching up with the reality of aging
• The influencer economy has crossed the linet
• AI might be a great investment --- but not for the government
• Don't rely on the Bank of Mom and Dad
• Can't find a job after graduation? Blame WFH, not AI
• Trump accounts are a new way to redistribute wealth
• Trump accounts are a new way to redistribute wealth
• Taxing the wealthy won't reduce their power
• A wartime economy would be different this time
• Why aren't Americans working as hard as they used to?
• $100,000 in Social Security benefits is too much
• The Laffer Curve is no longer a punch line
• Yes, Americans are saving enough for retirement
• Is free trade worth the cost in lives lost?
• Mamdani's New York is flirting with fiscal nihilism
• America's human capital is eroding
• Musk is wrong about AI and retirement --- You still need to save
• Go ahead and resent boomers but for the right reasons
• Raiding your 401(k) to buy a house should be an option
• Americans are living in the worst of all tax worlds
• Think of college like you would a junk bond
• The economy needs a little bit of unfairness
• The pension revolution is better for savers
• Affordability isn't a hoax. It's not a crisis for most, either
• America gets retirement wrong. Can Vanguard fix that?
• The American middle class is shrinking, and that's OK
• Want to buy a home? It's OK to wait till you're 40
• Mamdani is benefiting from New York City's changing workforce
• How can an economy this good feel this bad?
• Why boomers have more money than everyone else
• Democratize private investment?
• Lab-grown diamonds are testing the power of markets
• Inflation ate your free lunch, but you're still better off
• Good debt? Bad debt? There's no such thing
• Megabills didn't break the economy before and won't now
• America's broken politics is breaking economics, too
• A college degree is no longer a risk-free investment
• Break up Columbia? Maybe, and the rest of the Ivy League, too
• Even Dems might like MAGA accounts
• Reality Check about possibile volatility in trade war
• Is this really how American exceptionalism ends?
• The free-market conservative is a vanishing breed
• Shareholder capitalism is back
• Europe's risk aversion comes with consequences
• The Oxford curriculum that American universities need
• Private equity won't diversify your portfolio
• The era of declining interest rates may have come to an end, and many investors don't seem to realize it
• This one weird trick could save the U.S. economy
• The Fed's damage to the housing market may last years
• The future of unions looks very different
• To bring back the office, bring back lunch
• Does it really matter who gets into Harvard?
• Our pensions shouldn't be used to juice the economy
• A soft landing won't mean the economy is safe
• The 30-year mortgage is saving the U.S. economy … or is it?
• The one true secret to successful investing
• Less work, more burn-out
• When did risk become a bad word in the U.S.?
• AI-proofing your career starts in college
• Biden has to learn the same lesson as SVB
• Say it with Rubio: Changing clocks is stupid
• Sure, we'll return to the office in 2023 but not to stores
• How to manage the biggest risk of all: Uncertainty
• If you think U.S. pensions are safe, just wait
• Harry and Meghan and the perils of superstar culture
• Norman Rockwell's economy is never coming back
• Burned by crypto? Don't learn the wrong lesson
• Quiet Quitters are looking in the wrong place for meaningful work
• America's MBAs are the latest skeptics of capitalism
• Generation Z is getting a harsh lesson in stock risk
• The biggest threat to the U.S. economy is policymakers
• Buck up, boomers. You're still better off than your parents
• How to manage the biggest risk of all: uncertainty
• Startup boom is the kind of risk-taking Americans need
• Gen Z is too compliant to achieve greatness
• A bigger child tax credit isn't the poverty solution we need
• Finding your power in a higher-priced world
• The Biden administration's plans to double the tax rate on capital gains will prove costly to all Americans, not just the wealthy
• WARNING: Feel Good Now --- Pay Later: Stimulus is crammed with goodies but makes no economic sense
• The 'Stakeholder' Fallacy: Joe Biden's vision of capitalism is a recipe for failure