Jewish World Review May 27, 2003 / 25 Iyar, 5763

Bill O'Reilly

Bill O'Reiley
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The lynching of Bill Bennett | We live in a spin-filled world, and it's getting worse. The sad case of Dr. William Bennett is a vivid example of that. His critics have hung him in the town square with a sign saying "hypocrite." But let's take a look at the big picture.

When President Clinton was exposed for having lied under oath in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case, his defenders, mostly on the Left, screamed long and loud that lying about sex was permissible even under oath. Even though Mr. Clinton had taken the presidential oath to uphold the laws of the land, and perjury is included in that basket, the word hypocrite was never entertained by the Left.

When the Reverend Jesse Jackson, Mr. Clinton's spiritual advisor, was exposed for fathering a child out-of-wedlock and then paying the mother, his mistress, with tax-exempt funds, few on the Left said a word. And certainly the word hypocrite could have been applied in this situation.

But when Bill Bennett was found to have an expensive predilection for legal gambling, the author of "The Book of Virtues" was vilified by leftist pundits like Michael Kinsley and Frank Rich, who wielded the hypocrite description like a sledgehammer in an attempt to pound Bennett into dust.

You can decide whether Bill Bennett is a hypocrite or not, but the tactics used by the Left in this matter are surely disturbing. If you read Bennett's books, his main thesis is that parents and teachers should be good role models for children, and provide them with traditional moral values that engender respect for others and themselves. That is Bennett's basic message.

So why are Kinsley and Rich so thrilled that a messenger of this kind has been damaged by slot machines? I know Bennett is a conservative and blasted the moral tone set by President Clinton, but so what? His main crusade is to help children succeed in this hyper-competitive society.

Bennett's wife is the president of an organization called "Best Friends," which mentors inner city children from high-risk families. "Best Friends" does a tremendous amount of good, and the Bennetts donate their time and money to the cause without calling press conferences touting their largesse.

By contrast, Frank Rich, one of Bennett's main tormentors, entitled his New York Times attack on Bennett "Tupac's Revenge." Rich's unbelievably harebrained theme was that the rap music spawned by the late Tupac Shakur has prospered while Bennett, who has criticized gangsta rap, has been taken down. Rich is happy about this. Rich apparently believes that lyrics glorifying drugs, violence and the abuse of women are far more worthy than platitudes from "The Book of Virtues." Is this nuts, or what?

The lynching of Bill Bennett has been designed to send a clear message: If you dare to make judgments about personal behavior, watch out if you have any sins yourself. Of course, everybody has sins, and if the standard for making moral pronouncements is personal perfection, than no one would be able to make any.

And that is the goal of the secularists, a judgment-free society. They believe that there is no place in American society for standards of conduct based on moral principles. The secularists want a behavioral free-fire zone, and G-d, pardon the spiritual reference, help you if you disagree with that.

But most Americans do disagree with the secularists and want a society based on Judeo-Christian philosophy, nearly every poll on the matter demonstrates that. But the secularists, as Bill Bennett found out, hold enormous power, especially in the print media.

Bennett gave the witch hunters rope, and they hung him with it. But those of us watching this brutal display should think about its wider implications. The personal destruction of a man espousing the protection of children surely is devoid of any virtue. And the conduct of the people participating in that destruction is certainly unbecoming.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show, "The O'Reilly Factor," and author of the new book, "The No-Spin Zone: Confrontations with the Powerful and Famous in America" Comments by clicking here.


05/19/03: Get back home, Madonna
05/12/03: Prom night -- all white
05/05/03: Let's misbehave
04/28/03: No pain, no gain?
04/21/03: We stand of guard for thee
04/14/03: The spoils of war
04/07/03: When the truth is a casualty
03/31/03: Yes, you're entitled to your uninformed opinion
03/24/03: That's the way it isn't, Walter
03/17/03: This loyal Catholic believes that, humanistically, the Pope is one of the many Saddam enablers
03/10/03: The new Nazis
03/03/03: Hey, it's personal
02/24/03: A peace of the action
02/18/03: Cash for what?
02/10/03: Runaway train
02/03/03: Dissenting dishonest dissent
01/27/03: The Clooney Factor
01/21/03: Poverty-inducing entertainment
01/13/03: To protect and serve
12/30/02: Global double Crossing
12/30/02: The villains of 2002
12/23/02: Finding offense where none is intended is a form of selfishness
12/16/02: The Houston lesson
12/09/02: Somewhere Santa is weeping
12/02/02: A taxing situation
11/26/02: Talk is expensive when it comes to Bill Moyers
11/18/02: Sanity has left the building
11/11/02: The right stuff
11/04/02: The Attorney General blues
10/28/02: This ain't no game
10/21/02: It's only rock and roll, but it's brutal
10/14/02: The root of all evil
10/07/02: When children murder
09/23/02: The death of outrage
09/17/02: Singing a different tune
09/09/02: Answering my critics about the Roush case
09/03/02: Let's misbehave
08/26/02: Money makes the world go 'round
08/19/02: Long live the King
08/12/02: A friendly reminder
08/05/02: Heaven only knows
07/29/02: Blood money
07/22/02: Suffer the children
07/15/02: Reaching critical mass
07/08/02: Believe it or not
07/01/02: Charity begins at home
06/24/02: Spinning a tale and the case for "Stupid White Men"
06/17/02: Blank those Europeans!
06/10/02: What does Bono want from us?
06/03/02: On fighting evil
05/28/02: A Tale of Two Churches
05/20/02: Crimes against humanity
05/13/02: Silence of the lambs
05/06/02: Hide the children
04/29/02: 'Paul, Paul, Paul!'
04/22/02: Barbarians in the Church
04/15/02: Pray for peace, polish the weapons
03/11/02: Do no harm? Time to spank "Dr. Phil"
03/04/02: Promoting the general welfare
02/25/02: Who's responsible?
02/19/02: Lay it on them
02/11/02: Buy dope, fund terror
02/04/02: Back room deals
01/28/02: From boom to bust
01/21/02: The Fairness Doctrine
01/14/02: Hey, Paula, take it to the bank and hush up
01/07/02: And justice for none
12/31/01: All that's left
12/24/01: Santa is appalled
12/17/01: Fight the power
12/10/01: The black challenge
12/03/01: How things have changed
11/26/01: Waiting in the Bushes
11/19/01: The sign of the Cross
11/09/01: Hollyweird strikes back
11/06/01: The fear factor
10/26/01: Show me the money
10/22/01: See no evil
10/15/01: Peace, but no quiet
10/08/01: The air war
10/01/01: I don't understand
09/24/01: We are all soldiers, and we have a job to do
09/14/01: Evil on display
09/11/01: Family matters!
09/04/01: End of summer blues
08/27/01: Summertime -- and the livin' ain't easy
08/20/01: The rap on rap
08/13/01: The truth hurts
08/06/01: Amnesty for illegals: Bush's political investment
07/30/01: The big picture on Condit-Levy
07/24/01: Silence of the Shams
07/16/01: Condit, Kennedy and cable news
07/09/01: Heather needs a childhood: The unnecessary loss of innocence
07/02/01: What would have happened if Steven Spielberg had recut "Schindler's List" for German audiences so they wouldn't be confronted with "emotional issues"?
06/25/01: Freak dancing
06/18/01: Work or die
06/11/01: Soundbite nation
06/04/01: Paying through the nose
05/29/01: Graduation Day 2001
05/21/01: Accepting the unacceptable
05/14/01: The Clinton legacy
05/07/01: Kerrey's ordeal
04/27/01: Is the party over?
04/20/01: Racism in public education
04/16/01: The fleecing of America
04/10/01: People who need perspective
04/03/01: Dubya's bottom line --- and ours
03/27/01: Don't tell, don't ask
03/20/01: Greenspan with envy
03/13/01: Clinton and Jackson
03/07/01: All that's left in America
02/27/01: The Letterman experience
02/20/01: Bread and circuses
02/06/01: How the Clintons do it
01/30/01: The Bush dilemma
01/24/01: I have been investigating Jackson's finances for the past two years
01/17/01: Sifting Ashcroft's record

© 2001 Creators Syndicate