Jewish World Review March 11, 2002 / 27 Adar, 5762

Bill O'Reilly

Bill O'Reiley
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Do no harm? Time to spank "Dr. Phil" | First, do no harm. That is the mantra for every sincere healthcare giver in this world. But harm is in the eye of the beholder. And that brings me to Dr. Phil McGraw.

Up until a couple of weeks ago, I had not been paying much attention to this guy. I knew he appeared with regularity on the Oprah Winfrey program, and I knew he sold a lot of books. So I asked one of the producers on my TV program, "The O'Reilly Factor," to call his publisher, Simon & Schuster, and invite Dr. Phil on "The Factor."

We were turned down very quickly.

Now that's very strange because most authors, even best-selling ones, want to promote their books on well-watched news programs. The audience for news is usually very literate and affluent, and they buy hardcover books. So why would Dr. Phil turn us down? I love a good mystery.

Phil McGraw has a Ph.D. in psychology from North Texas State and was practicing in Wichita Falls, Texas, when he met Ms. Winfrey, who, at the time, was fighting a lawsuit filed by a Texas rancher. Apparently, Dr. McGraw impressed Oprah with his no-nonsense outlook, and the rest is history.

Oprah uses McGraw to analyze regular folks who have marital and relationship problems. And herein lies another problem. Even though the troubled guests freely agree to appear on "Oprah," their situations are explicitly discussed and critiqued by Dr. Phil in front of millions worldwide. A few weeks ago, a sad sack couple named Rebecca and Michael sat there talking about Michael's adultery and Rebecca's sexual hang-ups because of the betrayal. Oprah introduced the segment by saying "Dr. Phil has a message for every woman who's ever been cheated on, and he is not messing around." Indeed.

Dr. Phil dismantled the hapless Michael, at one point telling him: "They say, hey, it's just the dog in me. What can I tell you? It was there, and it was over with. But it's not over with. This is something that may have been a one-night stand for you, but it has been a two-year hell for her."

The guy was looking at his shoes, his wife glaring, the audience judging. Phil and Oprah sat side by side shaking their heads. The conversation continued until Phil told the couple to "stop blowing smoke at themselves," or something like that. The segment wrapped up with Phil saying the couple had "a lot of unfinished emotional business, and you've got to give it a voice."


Now, all of this would just be routine daytime TV fodder, if not for one unspoken element. Rebecca and Michael have school-aged children! Kids who now have to deal with everyone in their town knowing all about their parents' marital situation. Can you imagine children having to face that at school, on the playground, at scout meetings?

Do no harm?

I want to ask Dr. Phil and Oprah about the children of these dopey adults who allow themselves to be used on national television. Who is responsible if emotional damage is done to those kids? Do they get to go on "Oprah" and tell Dr. Phil about "a lot of unfinished emotional business" in their lives? What the heck is going on here?

After a bit of research, I found out that Dr. Phil is controversial among therapists. One camp sees him as an emotions hustler who has turned serious psychotherapy into a carnival sideshow. The other camp says Phil is doing a service by showing dysfunctional couples to the world and chastising them to get "real." The thinking in this camp is that some viewers may decide to seek private therapy after watching Dr. Phil in action, and that's a good thing.

I don't care. Every adult in America is responsible for his or her own decisions. If they want to be humiliated on "Oprah," fine with me. But I do care about innocent children who will be stigmatized by the foolish actions of their immature parents. And I do care that powerful people like Oprah and Dr. Phil are, apparently, ignoring the plight of these kids.

Do no harm, Dr. Phil. What say you?

JWR contributor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show, "The O'Reilly Factor," and author of the new book, "The No-Spin Zone: Confrontations with the Powerful and Famous in America" Comments by clicking here.


03/04/02: Promoting the general welfare
02/25/02: Who's responsible?
02/19/02: Lay it on them
02/11/02: Buy dope, fund terror
02/04/02: Back room deals
01/28/02: From boom to bust
01/21/02: The Fairness Doctrine
01/14/02: Hey, Paula, take it to the bank and hush up
01/07/02: And justice for none
12/31/01: All that's left
12/24/01: Santa is appalled
12/17/01: Fight the power
12/10/01: The black challenge
12/03/01: How things have changed
11/26/01: Waiting in the Bushes
11/19/01: The sign of the Cross
11/09/01: Hollyweird strikes back
11/06/01: The fear factor
10/26/01: Show me the money
10/22/01: See no evil
10/15/01: Peace, but no quiet
10/08/01: The air war
10/01/01: I don't understand
09/24/01: We are all soldiers, and we have a job to do
09/14/01: Evil on display
09/11/01: Family matters!
09/04/01: End of summer blues
08/27/01: Summertime -- and the livin' ain't easy
08/20/01: The rap on rap
08/13/01: The truth hurts
08/06/01: Amnesty for illegals: Bush's political investment
07/30/01: The big picture on Condit-Levy
07/24/01: Silence of the Shams
07/16/01: Condit, Kennedy and cable news
07/09/01: Heather needs a childhood: The unnecessary loss of innocence
07/02/01: What would have happened if Steven Spielberg had recut "Schindler's List" for German audiences so they wouldn't be confronted with "emotional issues"?
06/25/01: Freak dancing
06/18/01: Work or die
06/11/01: Soundbite nation
06/04/01: Paying through the nose
05/29/01: Graduation Day 2001
05/21/01: Accepting the unacceptable
05/14/01: The Clinton legacy
05/07/01: Kerrey's ordeal
04/27/01: Is the party over?
04/20/01: Racism in public education
04/16/01: The fleecing of America
04/10/01: People who need perspective
04/03/01: Dubya's bottom line --- and ours
03/27/01: Don't tell, don't ask
03/20/01: Greenspan with envy
03/13/01: Clinton and Jackson
03/07/01: All that's left in America
02/27/01: The Letterman experience
02/20/01: Bread and circuses
02/06/01: How the Clintons do it
01/30/01: The Bush dilemma
01/24/01: I have been investigating Jackson's finances for the past two years
01/17/01: Sifting Ashcroft's record

© 2001 Creators Syndicate