Jewish World Review June 3, 2002 / 22 Sivan, 5762

Bill O'Reilly

Bill O'Reiley
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

On fighting evil | With summer upon us, the war on terrorism may become somewhat blinded by the light. I mean, who wants to think about Osama bin Laden and his sociopathic pals while laying on the beach? Possible nuke strikes don't exactly go well with box seats at a Red Sox game.

But America is fighting an enemy every bit as dangerous as the Nazis, Japanese and Soviets were, and we should be reminded of that time and time again. In fact, the Muslim fanatics that are killing civilians worldwide are capable of doing anything and everything. Do you doubt that they would use nuclear weapons or smallpox if they could? You'd be foolish if you did.

So how do we neutralize this enemy? The Israelis tried to bulldoze their hideouts and incarcerate their leaders. But Hamas and Islamic Jihad are still sending suicide bombers to kill Jewish women and children in cafes.

The United States destroyed the Taliban, but bin Laden's assassins are still operating in Afghanistan and around the world. Is there no solution to this enemy?

As a matter of fact, there is, but the solution goes against the traditions of America. The way to fight Islamic terrorists is to terrorize them. Bring the war to their villages and homes. Strike them unexpectedly with lethal force.

This cannot be done with conventional forces or with rules of engagement sanctioned by the Geneva Convention. Fighting terror with terror opens the grisly door of human rights violations and crimes against humanity. Yet it must be done.

Former Secretary of State George Schultz told an audience of diplomats in Virginia that "we [the United States] reserve, within the framework of our right to self-defense, the right to preempt terrorist threats within a state's borders ..."

That's a polite way of saying that America is going to attack some nations that aide and harbor terrorists. Hello, Iraq.

But this kind of militaristic saber-rattling always has a downside. Whenever a military operation is launched, it becomes a page-one story and inflames worldwide public opinion. We usually have to buy off our so-called allies with cash to go along, and we always take massive propaganda hits. So I believe there is a better way to "preempt terrorist threats."

The United States and Britain should form elite commando units that would supervise the assassinations of known terrorist leaders and operatives. These killings could be contracted out to local people, or they could be done by the U.S. Delta Force or the British SAS. But they must be done quietly and methodically.

If that strategy became public, the media would howl, and the human rights groups would condemn, but what is the real alternative here? Shall we wait until one of these terrorist groups gets a small nuclear device operational and in the name of Allah blows up Baltimore?

That's what happens in the movie "The Sum of All Fears," which is basically a cartoon that adds nothing to the national discourse. Nevertheless, the movie makers understand that the technology exists for a terrorist nuclear strike.

So it seems to me that responsible world leaders have a mandate to neutralize Muslim fanatics and send a message that people who sign up for terrorist duty may die in their beds -- wherever those beds may be. Eliminating terrorist leaders and the people who encourage them -- including Muslim clerics -- would be both effective and permissible, considering the global threat they present. It is not easy replacing leaders in any situation.

After Sept. 11, President Bush very quietly issued an order that deadly force would be used because our national security was in danger. The rationale for that order comes from the U.N. charter, of all places, which sanctions killing in self-defense. Article 51 says that "measures" may be taken by any member of the U.N. that experiences an armed attack.

Certainly, America qualifies. The word "measures" is not defined in the article, so I will define it now: The USA has a right to kill known terrorists. There, that settles it.

Fanatics bent on destroying civilians with weapons of mass destruction, including jetliners, deserve to be placed on a self-defense assassination list. How can any reasonable person argue against this? It is time for sane world leaders to recognize the al Qaeda threat for what it is -- a doomsday scenario.

Perhaps President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair have already secretly decided that targeted assassination is a reasonable and effective option. Let's hope so.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show, "The O'Reilly Factor," and author of the new book, "The No-Spin Zone: Confrontations with the Powerful and Famous in America" Comments by clicking here.


05/28/02: A Tale of Two Churches
05/20/02: Crimes against humanity
05/13/02: Silence of the lambs
05/06/02: Hide the children
04/29/02: 'Paul, Paul, Paul!'
04/22/02: Barbarians in the Church
04/15/02: Pray for peace, polish the weapons
03/11/02: Do no harm? Time to spank "Dr. Phil"
03/04/02: Promoting the general welfare
02/25/02: Who's responsible?
02/19/02: Lay it on them
02/11/02: Buy dope, fund terror
02/04/02: Back room deals
01/28/02: From boom to bust
01/21/02: The Fairness Doctrine
01/14/02: Hey, Paula, take it to the bank and hush up
01/07/02: And justice for none
12/31/01: All that's left
12/24/01: Santa is appalled
12/17/01: Fight the power
12/10/01: The black challenge
12/03/01: How things have changed
11/26/01: Waiting in the Bushes
11/19/01: The sign of the Cross
11/09/01: Hollyweird strikes back
11/06/01: The fear factor
10/26/01: Show me the money
10/22/01: See no evil
10/15/01: Peace, but no quiet
10/08/01: The air war
10/01/01: I don't understand
09/24/01: We are all soldiers, and we have a job to do
09/14/01: Evil on display
09/11/01: Family matters!
09/04/01: End of summer blues
08/27/01: Summertime -- and the livin' ain't easy
08/20/01: The rap on rap
08/13/01: The truth hurts
08/06/01: Amnesty for illegals: Bush's political investment
07/30/01: The big picture on Condit-Levy
07/24/01: Silence of the Shams
07/16/01: Condit, Kennedy and cable news
07/09/01: Heather needs a childhood: The unnecessary loss of innocence
07/02/01: What would have happened if Steven Spielberg had recut "Schindler's List" for German audiences so they wouldn't be confronted with "emotional issues"?
06/25/01: Freak dancing
06/18/01: Work or die
06/11/01: Soundbite nation
06/04/01: Paying through the nose
05/29/01: Graduation Day 2001
05/21/01: Accepting the unacceptable
05/14/01: The Clinton legacy
05/07/01: Kerrey's ordeal
04/27/01: Is the party over?
04/20/01: Racism in public education
04/16/01: The fleecing of America
04/10/01: People who need perspective
04/03/01: Dubya's bottom line --- and ours
03/27/01: Don't tell, don't ask
03/20/01: Greenspan with envy
03/13/01: Clinton and Jackson
03/07/01: All that's left in America
02/27/01: The Letterman experience
02/20/01: Bread and circuses
02/06/01: How the Clintons do it
01/30/01: The Bush dilemma
01/24/01: I have been investigating Jackson's finances for the past two years
01/17/01: Sifting Ashcroft's record

© 2001 Creators Syndicate