Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Feb. 28, 2002 / 16 Adar, 5762

James K. Glassman

Jim Glassman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Trusting monopolists

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com --
THE Federal Communications Commission last Thursday proposed exempting high-speed Internet access services from the rules that foster competition in basic telephone services. "If adopted," reported the Washington Post the next day, "the rules would hand large regional telephone companies a key victory."

The FCC proposal tracks the most important provision in legislation introduced two years ago by Reps. Billy Tauzin (R-La) and John Dingell (D-Mich). That bill, which strongly favors the four mega-Bell regional monopolies, is set to go to the House floor for a long-delayed vote this week.

While likely to pass the House, where a defeat would be an enormous embarrassment to the new chairman and the ranking member of the powerful Commerce Committee, it is expected to encounter strong resistance in the Senate, where the chairman of the key committee, Sen. Fritz Hollings (D-S.C.) staunchly opposes it. But the FCC would accomplish the aims of the Tauzin-Dingell bill without a new law being passed.

Predictably, the FCC decision devastated the stocks of competitors to the four Bells. While the new proposed rulemaking - in Orwellian fashion - promises "to promote widespread deployment of high-speed broadband Internet access services" - its effect will be to cripple severely and probably kill off the remaining Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) that blossomed with the Telecommunications Act of 1996, a law that the FCC would effectively gut.

Clear evidence of the damage to the CLECs came last week and this week in the form of sharp declines in stock prices. Last year, working with economist William Lehr of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, I constructed an index of CLEC stocks and concluded in an "event study" that on days on which news favored Tauzin-Dingell, the index declined sharply.

On the first full trading day after the FCC rulemaking was announced, the CLEC index dropped 6.2 percent, a loss of $272 million in market capitalization. (By comparison, the Nasdaq Composite Index fell 2.1 percent that day.) Over a period of four trading days, from Feb. 14 through 20, the CLEC index dropped 12.6 percent, compared with a decline in the Nasdaq of 4.4 percent.

In its decision, the FCC appeared almost to write off the CLECs as competitors to the Bells and, instead, to trust the Bell monopolies to roll out Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) services and to further upgrade their networks on their own, without the pressure of CLEC competition.

The new rules, said the Post, "would significantly shift the federal government's approach to telecommunications policy." It is now clear that the FCC chairman, Michael Powell, favors competition among different platforms for broadband delivery systems - mainly, DSL (which works over telephone lines) and cable (which works over coaxial cables now used mainly for TV) - rather than competition within the DSL platform itself, as the Telecom Act of 1996 envisioned.

As a result, wrote Jonathan Krim in the Post, "Consumer groups and independent Internet access providers argue that this policy will leave the country with a tiny number of broadband providers that would wield tremendous power over the availability of Internet service and content. Localities typically are served by only one cable company and one telephone carrier."

The result would almost certainly be higher prices and diminished service.

"If you don't have competition within each platform, then you will spend all this effort to end up with a duopoly or an oligopoly," the Post quoted David Baker, policy director for EarthLink, Inc., the nation's second-largest Internet access provider, as saying.

Two recent reports, one from the FCC itself and the other issued by the Department of Commerce, conclude that hi-speed internet access in the U.S. is being rolled out in a timely manner, and show evidence of a huge increase in broadband-equipped homes last year. Even in the face of such evidence, the FCC is turning away from the policy adopted by Congress and the President six years ago and instead is choosing a policy that could be termed, "Trust the monopolist."


JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.

Up

02/22/02: How not to get taken when buying stocks
02/06/02: Investing After 9/11
01/30/02: Blue Light Specials? Advice on snapping-up K-Mart or Enron stock
01/24/02: Dare to be obscure
01/16/02: Bank on this
01/10/02: What goes down...
01/04/02: An asset-focused investor finds 'deep value' stocks
12/26/01: High-Tech Funds Low On Tech
12/19/01: Tech Sector: Blodget, Meeker, and You
12/12/01: Enron's lessons: Be skeptical of experts
12/04/01: CLECs alive and well, but not if Tauzin-Dingell passes
11/15/01: The "Next Big Thing" in Technology?
10/30/01: A National I.D. Card? Yes; Run By Larry Ellison? No
10/25/01: Without Bayer, we're bare to bioterror
10/18/01: The Battle of Biotech
10/05/01: Two Techs for Tough Times
09/26/01: The Information War
09/05/01: Tech firms built to last through tough times
08/23/01: Stocks on the A-List
08/17/01: Labor and management finding online learning to their liking
08/08/01: Game makers poised to profit
07/19/01: Trade Promotion Authority: High-Techís Key Component for Competitiveness
07/12/01: Nothingís arbitrary about the contrarians
06/27/01: Look to Politics to Find Broadband's Market Cap Shortfall
06/22/01: Tech Commodity Buys Available for Mining
06/18/01: The Blackout Portfolio
06/14/01: The conservation myth stars as latest (sub)urban legend
06/07/01: Will America go high tech on the high seas?
06/05/01: 'Price gouging' doesn't cut it as reason for rising energy prices
06/01/01: Authentication tools opening up opportunities in online security
05/25/01: 'Price gouging' doesnít cut it as reason for rising energy prices
05/21/01: Banking on High-Tech Education
05/17/01: It's No Time to Go Wobbly on Kyoto
05/02/01: Diversify with techís leaders
04/26/01: To Revive The New Economy, Release A Chokehold   —   Break Up The Bells
04/24/01: Whoís To Blame For Broadband Crisis? Wired Article Points To Bells
04/19/01: The Bush Budget
04/12/01: To revive The New Economy, release a chokehold --- break up the Bells
04/04/01: Even as stocks have fallen, the Net keeps booming
03/28/01: Whereís The Profit In Biotech Future?
03/22/01: The Joy of Debt: The last thing we should want is a U.S. Treasury flush with cash
03/19/01: 'Defensive' Stocks in the NASDAQ
03/15/01: Bush administration must say no to Jane and Kyoto
03/08/01: Time to buy small caps? Consider these five great techs
03/01/01: Billís and Larryís continued political adventures
02/26/01: Chips on the Dips?
02/23/01: How Tauzin Can Keep His Word And Stop Telecom "Remonopolization"
02/13/01: Consumers, WAKE UP! Middlemen are ripping you off
02/02/01: Publicity-Seeking Politicians and Contingency-Fee Lawyers Corrupt the Law
01/26/01: DoubleClick, eBay And Their Promising Ilk
01/24/01: Will Cyberspace Look Like France or America?
12/27/00: Cut interest, taxes and regulation to save high-tech economy
12/20/00: Close, But No Big Czar
12/15/00: A Down Year? Maybe. But Letís Put It in Perspective
12/13/00: Clintonís sorry midnight race into history
12/07/00: Is Telecomís Future The Bells, The Bells, and Only The Bells?
12/01/00: Money talks and walks in election aftermath
11/29/00: Climate Treaty Deadlock Shows Lack of Consensus and Common Sense
11/23/00: Climate change participants donít listen to reasons for uncertainty
11/21/00: Will Regulators Create a Recession?
11/14/00: The Election and the Market
10/26/00: Hang on for the long term
10/25/00: On privacy, one size doesnít fit all
10/24/00: Perish the bearish thought
10/19/00: Beating hunger --- the biggest prize
10/13/00: Way to play biotech
10/12/00: Bush vs. Gore on Technology
10/11/00: Global Climate Scare: Fools Rush In
10/05/00: Avoid the Apple Trap
10/03/00: Goodbye, anti-Microsoft crusader --- and good riddance
09/29/00: Should You Invest in Tech IPOs?
09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Donít Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the Amazon.com
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When Itís Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap

© 2002, Tech Central Station