Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 22, 2001 / 1 Tamuz, 5761

James K. Glassman

Jim Glassman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Tech Commodity Buys Available for Mining --
AS I write this column, the NASDAQ composite is bouncing around just below 2000. Market gurus warn of a long summer for technology investors. And many analysts continue to note that even though the technology sector has fallen by 20 percent so far in 2001, after an even more horrendous year in 2000, tech stocks are still not cheap. How much worse can it get? Well, if youíre looking for doomsday theories, find another column. Iím a long-term bull, and Iím not about to succumb to a bearish fad.

Itís true that many great tech firms still trade at high price/earnings ratios, by historical standards. I believe that in many cases the valuations are justified, but what many of the pundits are missing is that there are also plenty of tech companies that are dirt cheap by almost any standard.

Letís look below the surface of the technology industry to examine the unsung firms that provide crucial components for the digital revolution. Unwilling to buy Cisco (CSCO) when itís still valued at roughly five times its annual revenues? Well, how about a tech firm that trades at five times its earnings? Yes, there are a few of them. Kemet Corp. (KEM) and AVX Corp. (AVX) make capacitors, used in abundance in electronic devices from computers to cell phones to microwave ovens. Are these two companies establishing powerful brand names with leading edge technology? Not at all. They make commodity products, which will never be confused with microprocessors. You wonít see these companies on the cover of Forbes, and no one will ever refer to their products as ďthe brains inside the PC.Ē

But both companies have been increasing their profit margins in recent quarters, both have an impressive record of rising earnings, and they have good balance sheets Ė not too much debt. By no means do they control their destiny or exercise leadership in technology markets. They ride along with the fortunes of the tech industry, but right now the fare is very inexpensive for shareholders.

Kemet is trading at a price/earnings ratio of about 4, while AVX has a P/E ratio just below 6. Either one could be a good investment for someone who is bullish on technology but thinks the super techs are still too expensive. No doubt, Kemetís earnings will fall off this year. Only two analysts cover the stock, and their estimates are for $1 in earnings this year and about $2 next year. Over the past 12 months, Kemet earned about $4. Still, even at $2 a couple years from now, Kemetís earnings would mean that todayís price (about $18) indicates a P/E of 9. And the earnings estimates could be far too low. As of March 31, the company had $360 million in cash, no short-term debt, and long-term debt of a relatively modest $100 million.

Another passenger on the technology gravy train is Arrow Electronics (ARW), which distributes computer products and components worldwide. Again, not a creator of innovative products, but a major player in distribution, itís potentially attractive as a conservative bet on the continued growth of information technology markets. Sales have doubled in four years to $13 billion, and while analysts expect profits to fall this year, the P/E today, based on expected earnings for 2002, is in single digits.

JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.


06/18/01: The Blackout Portfolio
06/14/01: The conservation myth stars as latest (sub)urban legend
06/07/01: Will America go high tech on the high seas?
06/05/01: 'Price gouging' doesn't cut it as reason for rising energy prices
06/01/01: Authentication tools opening up opportunities in online security
05/25/01: 'Price gouging' doesnít cut it as reason for rising energy prices
05/21/01: Banking on High-Tech Education
05/17/01: It's No Time to Go Wobbly on Kyoto
05/02/01: Diversify with techís leaders
04/26/01: To Revive The New Economy, Release A Chokehold   —   Break Up The Bells
04/24/01: Whoís To Blame For Broadband Crisis? Wired Article Points To Bells
04/19/01: The Bush Budget
04/12/01: To revive The New Economy, release a chokehold --- break up the Bells
04/04/01: Even as stocks have fallen, the Net keeps booming
03/28/01: Whereís The Profit In Biotech Future?
03/22/01: The Joy of Debt: The last thing we should want is a U.S. Treasury flush with cash
03/19/01: 'Defensive' Stocks in the NASDAQ
03/15/01: Bush administration must say no to Jane and Kyoto
03/08/01: Time to buy small caps? Consider these five great techs
03/01/01: Billís and Larryís continued political adventures
02/26/01: Chips on the Dips?
02/23/01: How Tauzin Can Keep His Word And Stop Telecom "Remonopolization"
02/13/01: Consumers, WAKE UP! Middlemen are ripping you off
02/02/01: Publicity-Seeking Politicians and Contingency-Fee Lawyers Corrupt the Law
01/26/01: DoubleClick, eBay And Their Promising Ilk
01/24/01: Will Cyberspace Look Like France or America?
12/27/00: Cut interest, taxes and regulation to save high-tech economy
12/20/00: Close, But No Big Czar
12/15/00: A Down Year? Maybe. But Letís Put It in Perspective
12/13/00: Clintonís sorry midnight race into history
12/07/00: Is Telecomís Future The Bells, The Bells, and Only The Bells?
12/01/00: Money talks and walks in election aftermath
11/29/00: Climate Treaty Deadlock Shows Lack of Consensus and Common Sense
11/23/00: Climate change participants donít listen to reasons for uncertainty
11/21/00: Will Regulators Create a Recession?
11/14/00: The Election and the Market
10/26/00: Hang on for the long term
10/25/00: On privacy, one size doesnít fit all
10/24/00: Perish the bearish thought
10/19/00: Beating hunger --- the biggest prize
10/13/00: Way to play biotech
10/12/00: Bush vs. Gore on Technology
10/11/00: Global Climate Scare: Fools Rush In
10/05/00: Avoid the Apple Trap
10/03/00: Goodbye, anti-Microsoft crusader --- and good riddance
09/29/00: Should You Invest in Tech IPOs?
09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Donít Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When Itís Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap

© 2000, Tech Central Station