Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 7, 2001 / 17 Sivan, 5761

James K. Glassman

Jim Glassman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Will America go high tech on the high seas? --
DOES the government have something to learn from drug smugglers about balancing risks and benefits?

The thought struck me after reading two contrasting reports on the U.S. Coast Guard on the day after Motherís Day.

In the first, the Coast Guard reported making the biggest maritime drug seizure in U.S. history. Crewmen from the 210-foot cutter Active had boarded a Belize-flagged trawler in the Pacific on May 3. A thorough search turned up 26,800 pounds of cocaine, worth a half billion dollars. The trawlerís two Russian and 10 Ukrainian crew members face 10 years in jail; the boatís owners, a $4 million fine.

In the second, the General Accounting Office (GAO) tackled a plan that the Coast Guard calls Deepwater, an innovative way to acquire new equipment over the long term. In the past, the Coast Guard -- the fifth branch of the military service, with responsibility for protecting 3.4 million square miles of the nationís coastal waters -- would simply buy new vessels and aircraft separately, in common defense-acquisition practice. But Deepwater has a better idea: It integrates systems to meet specific performance goals. Those goals require both ships and planes (and other equipment, too), working together.

To that end, the Coast Guard has sought designs and from three private-sector teams, each under a lead contractor. The design phase is almost complete, and the Coast Guard will award the winner a contract next year. The cost: $500 million a year for 20 years, pocket change by most government programs, and, coincidentally, the same amount as the cash value of the drugs seized by the Active.

Such integrative management is becoming common in the private sector. But the approach has raised concerns among GAOís auditors, who worry that having only one integrating contractor, rather than competing ones after contracts are awarded, might lead to cost overruns.

As a fiscal conservative, I donít want to see government playing high-stakes games with untested systems. But, on the other hand, I would like to see government take some practical steps towards innovation, technological improvement, and private-sector management techniques. And the Coast Guardís Deepwater program fits that bill. It seems just the right size for a new idea of this sort, and the risks are actually low.

For one thing, the cost of replacing ships and aircraft on a one-for-one basis is about $500 million a year for 20 years, anyway. And there is no doubt that this recapitalization is needed. An interagency task force in 1999 reviewed the Coast Guardís burgeoning missions, and its fast-obsolescing fleet and said replacing old assets was a near-term national priority. From a technology standpoint, todayís Coast Guard more resembles Horatio Hornblower than James Bond.

Capt. Richard Kelly, the Coast Guardís chief of requirements for Deepwater, has said his agencyís ships ďare basically blind, deaf and dumb.Ē They still depend mostly on lookouts, rather than sophisticated sensing devices, to spot crash victims or refugees. And with an average age of 36 years, they are slower than most of the drug boats they are charged to interdict. The Coast Guardís aircraft are similarly relics of the past.

Age factors last August forced Congress to provide a $77 million supplemental appropriation to keep Coast Guard equipment running. And, still, the agency had to cut back on missions to save wear and tear both on equipment and its crewmembers.

Another factor favoring taking the plunge on Deepwater is that the Coast Guard has demonstrated a can-do spirit in the face of a cutback of 4,000 personnel during the Clinton years. It is one of only three federal agencies in the last three years to earn an overall ďAĒ grade from the Federal Performance Project of George Washington Universityís School of Public Administration. Also, the GAO has given the Coast Guard high marks for its management of the design stage and of near-term risks so far. In private business, success like this earns both rewards and new responsibilities.

Finally, and perhaps most important, the Bush administration wisely wants all federal agencies to begin implementing performance-based budgeting for their contracts. The purpose is the same as that in private business: to tie such spending to achieving specific goals. The innovations in procurement pioneered by Deepwater could be applied to other government operations, particularly the Pentagonís moribund and costly acquisition programs.

All of these factors make Deepwater compelling. Success could lead to a new model for procuring much more expensive systems in the future, save taxpayers tens of billions of dollars, and even raising the risks for drug smuggling. Congress would be wise to set aside the anachronistic concerns of the GAO and fully fund Deepwater the way the Coast Guard designed it.

JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.


06/05/01: 'Price gouging' doesn't cut it as reason for rising energy prices
06/01/01: Authentication tools opening up opportunities in online security
05/25/01: 'Price gouging' doesnít cut it as reason for rising energy prices
05/21/01: Banking on High-Tech Education
05/17/01: It's No Time to Go Wobbly on Kyoto
05/02/01: Diversify with techís leaders
04/26/01: To Revive The New Economy, Release A Chokehold   —   Break Up The Bells
04/24/01: Whoís To Blame For Broadband Crisis? Wired Article Points To Bells
04/19/01: The Bush Budget
04/12/01: To revive The New Economy, release a chokehold --- break up the Bells
04/04/01: Even as stocks have fallen, the Net keeps booming
03/28/01: Whereís The Profit In Biotech Future?
03/22/01: The Joy of Debt: The last thing we should want is a U.S. Treasury flush with cash
03/19/01: 'Defensive' Stocks in the NASDAQ
03/15/01: Bush administration must say no to Jane and Kyoto
03/08/01: Time to buy small caps? Consider these five great techs
03/01/01: Billís and Larryís continued political adventures
02/26/01: Chips on the Dips?
02/23/01: How Tauzin Can Keep His Word And Stop Telecom "Remonopolization"
02/13/01: Consumers, WAKE UP! Middlemen are ripping you off
02/02/01: Publicity-Seeking Politicians and Contingency-Fee Lawyers Corrupt the Law
01/26/01: DoubleClick, eBay And Their Promising Ilk
01/24/01: Will Cyberspace Look Like France or America?
12/27/00: Cut interest, taxes and regulation to save high-tech economy
12/20/00: Close, But No Big Czar
12/15/00: A Down Year? Maybe. But Letís Put It in Perspective
12/13/00: Clintonís sorry midnight race into history
12/07/00: Is Telecomís Future The Bells, The Bells, and Only The Bells?
12/01/00: Money talks and walks in election aftermath
11/29/00: Climate Treaty Deadlock Shows Lack of Consensus and Common Sense
11/23/00: Climate change participants donít listen to reasons for uncertainty
11/21/00: Will Regulators Create a Recession?
11/14/00: The Election and the Market
10/26/00: Hang on for the long term
10/25/00: On privacy, one size doesnít fit all
10/24/00: Perish the bearish thought
10/19/00: Beating hunger --- the biggest prize
10/13/00: Way to play biotech
10/12/00: Bush vs. Gore on Technology
10/11/00: Global Climate Scare: Fools Rush In
10/05/00: Avoid the Apple Trap
10/03/00: Goodbye, anti-Microsoft crusader --- and good riddance
09/29/00: Should You Invest in Tech IPOs?
09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Donít Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When Itís Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap

© 2000, Tech Central Station