Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Dec. 27, 2000 / 1 Teves, 5761

James K. Glassman

Jim Glassman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Cut interest, taxes and regulation to save high-tech economy --
THE BIG NEWS in technology as the year comes to an end is the sickening decline of the Nasdaq – from an all-time high of 5048 on March 10 to a 2233 last Wednesday – a drop of more than half.

What’s going on? First, politics.

I issued a special “Investor Alert” in late March here on TechCentralStation warning that high-technology stocks were being hurt by increased government intervention. I cited, especially, the decision by the Justice Department to push for a breakup of Microsoft, the growing desire by politicians to use the Internet as a new source of tax revenues, and the threat of a rollback of the Telecom Act of 1996, hindering the spread of broadband services.

The worst threats to high technology are proceeding swiftly to reality (the remonopolization of telecommunications is worse than even I had expected), and we may end up with my worst fear – a regulatory recession.

The Commerce Department reported Thursday that growth for the third quarter was just 2.2 percent – down by more than half from the average of the preceding year. Worse may be yet to come. My colleague at the American Enterprise Institute, the highly regarded economist John Makin, says that we are already in a recession.

I am not so sure about that, but clearly the economy is slowing. It needs three things to revive it: immediate rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, a significant tax reduction (or better yet, reform), and a new direction on regulatory policy from George W. Bush’s incoming administration.

Last week, the Fed’s Open Market Committee decided to keep short-term interest rates at 6.5 percent – absurdly high. Its only concession to a slowing economy was that statement that “the committee consequently believes that the risks are weighted mainly toward conditions that may generate economic weakness in the foreseeable future.”

If the economy falls into recession, the Fed will bear much of the blame. It raised rates six times over a year beginning June 1999, a total of 1.75 percentage points. Meanwhile, oil prices tripled. That combination is the stuff of recessions – even without the attack by government on technology.

Oil price rises, as Kevin Hassett has pointed out on, have a depressive, not inflationary, effect on an economy. It is true the Fed didn’t see the oil rise coming, but it should have taken steps immediately – in early fall at least – to lighten the drag. Now, even if the Fed does lower rates, we are faced with the possibility of too little, too late. On taxes: This country needs broad tax reform to encourage savings and investment. The best answer is a consumption-based flat tax, that is: no taxes at all on income that is used for savings, no deductions or loopholes, and a single rate for all, after a generous exemption. More likely, what we will get is an elimination of the marriage penalty and the estate tax. Neither is very important when it comes to spurring more work or investment.

Larry Lindsey, Bush’s top economic advisor during the campaign, has been pushing for a marginal rate cut (a trimming of the percentage that everyone pays in taxes on income), in part to spur a sluggish economy by inducing consumers to spend more. That’s fine, but the long-term goal should be the one I outlined above.

Finally, on regulation, Bush’s victory provides some hope. The key is for the new president to use his political capital wisely in the appointment process, naming true free-marketeers to posts at the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the Food and Drug Administration and the like.

What’s needed in the agencies are true believers in deregulation. For example, the next head of the FCC should be dedicated to doing away with the commission, just as the government eliminated the Federal Aviation Administration and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

The only regulator named so far is Christine Todd Whitman, the New Jersey governor, who will head the Environmental Protection Agency. I’m a fan, but I’m not sure where she stands on critical issues such as the disastrous Kyoto strictures on global warming. First thing she should do is read our dispatches from The Hague.

Tommy Thompson, governor of Wisconsin, is an excellent choice as head of HHS, and I’m especially pleased to see Gov. Jim Gilmore of Virginia moving into national office as head of the Republican Party. Here’s a man who understands that the way to allow technology to thrive is to get government out of the way.

Will we see that kind of change next year? Here’s hoping...

JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.


12/20/00: Close, But No Big Czar
12/15/00: A Down Year? Maybe. But Let’s Put It in Perspective
12/13/00: Clinton’s sorry midnight race into history
12/07/00: Is Telecom’s Future The Bells, The Bells, and Only The Bells?
12/01/00: Money talks and walks in election aftermath
11/29/00: Climate Treaty Deadlock Shows Lack of Consensus and Common Sense
11/23/00: Climate change participants don’t listen to reasons for uncertainty
11/21/00: Will Regulators Create a Recession?
11/14/00: The Election and the Market
10/26/00: Hang on for the long term
10/25/00: On privacy, one size doesn’t fit all
10/24/00: Perish the bearish thought
10/19/00: Beating hunger --- the biggest prize
10/13/00: Way to play biotech
10/12/00: Bush vs. Gore on Technology
10/11/00: Global Climate Scare: Fools Rush In
10/05/00: Avoid the Apple Trap
10/03/00: Goodbye, anti-Microsoft crusader --- and good riddance
09/29/00: Should You Invest in Tech IPOs?
09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Don’t Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When It’s Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap

© 2000, Tech Central Station