Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Sept. 29, 2000 / 29 Elul 5760

James K. Glassman

Jim Glassman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Should You Invest in Tech IPOs? --
EVER SINCE the Justice Department won round one against Microsoft last spring, these have been tough times for tech stocks. Small, money-losing dot-coms have been hit particularly hard. Many Internet companies are trading well below their highs, and more than a few have instructed their investment bankers to “pursue strategic alternatives.” Translation: “Somebody please bail us out before we have to fire the staff!”

The news is equally bad for start-ups that have had to cancel IPOs and the venture capitalists who now spend time trying to resuscitate the stinkers in their portfolios instead of chasing the next billion-dollar opportunity.

All of which means that I like this environment. I’m a contrarian at heart and I smell opportunity for those considering buying stock in newly-public tech companies. Faddish investors allowed some companies that should never have gone public to enjoy huge valuations. As investors have lost confidence in technology, there may be opportunities to buy at more attractive prices. And the markets are applying increasing scrutiny to dot-com business models, so you’re unlikely to see something like a coming public in the next year.

Now, I wish I could tell you that, in tune with the more hard-headed tenor of the times, the latest crop of Internet IPOs is showing strength by traditional measurements – robust earnings growth and solid fundamentals. But I can’t. The tech magazine The Industry Standard recently said this about Net IPOs in the third quarter of 2000: “…the financial underpinnings of Net firms remain weak: Median revenues were $9.1 million, while median net income fell to negative $6.1 million.”

So these are still fairly risky bets on the future. We’re talking about young companies, typically little more than two years old, with meager revenues and losses almost as large. And for short-term traders, there seems to be little chance of a big score. The median 90-day performance of Internet IPOs this year is 0%, compared to 80% last year and 34% in 1998. Still, what that really means is that many of these firms aren’t getting the opening-day pop that their predecessors once did. For the average investor, who often had to wait to buy the earlier tech IPOs until they had already soared far above their offering prices, this may be good news.

And the new stocks are being offered at more reasonable prices, at least by one measurement. In the second half of 2000, the median price-to-sales ratio of Internet IPOs is lower than it’s been since the first half of 1998. So IPO investors are now paying about $32 for each dollar of a company’s annual revenues, compared to $56 in the second half of 1999 and a whopping $69 in the first half of 2000.

By this measurement, Internet IPOs are still more expensive than other kinds of IPOs, such as biotech companies. But if you’re bullish on some of these young techs, you can pick them up for less than you might have had to pay in an earlier period. Does that mean that you should dive right in?

As usual, let me offer the caveats that you should have balance in your portfolio – companies in different industries and of different sizes -- and you should be an investor, not a trader. The short-term gains just aren’t there. But if you’re excited about a young company’s technology, if you use their products and you’re a happy customer, if you’re impressed with their management, look to seize the day now that other investors have grown skittish. As the market grows more skeptical, the offering valuations get cheaper and cheaper. So this could be the perfect time to add a brand new public company to your portfolio.

JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.


09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Don’t Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When It’s Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap

© 2000, Tech Central Station