Jewish World Review Jan. 30, 2002 / 17 Shevat, 5762
James K. Glassman
Blue Light Specials? Advice on snapping-up K-Mart or Enron stock
LOOKING for a bargain? A surprising number of readers in recent days have excitedly asked me about two stocks they want to buy because they look so cheap. One is Enron; the other is Kmart.
Both are in bankruptcy. Enron, focus of various criminal investigations, was booted off the New York Stock Exchange, but it was trading over-the-counter last week at 37 cents a share. Kmart, the venerable discount chain that has had the misfortune to compete against the greatest retailer of all time, Wal-Mart Stores, closed Friday at 85 cents.
To folks who want to invest in stocks like these, I have three things to say:
- Don't do it.
- Still, hearty congratulations for having the right instincts.
- Now, listen to a better idea along the same lines.
First, though, why shouldn't you buy a firm like Kmart, America's No. 2 discount retailer, with 2,100 stores and $37 billion in revenue? Its market capitalization -- that is, the total value that investors put on all of its outstanding stock, is a mere $463 million -- or about five days' sales. And don't investors go overboard on bad news, driving stock prices to ridiculously low levels in their haste to bail out? In short, isn't Kmart just the kind of company that value-lovers should adore?
Attention, Kmart shoppers: The first problem with this stock is that no one can possibly say what it's worth. Some of the stores and inventory will be sold off; the brand may survive; the business focus may change. Who knows? And, frankly, who cares?
The only good reason to invest in a stock is not that the company's salvage value may be somewhat higher than the market believes, but that the company itself is strong, profitable, well-protected against competitors, and likely to thrive for many decades. This, no one would say about Kmart. Or Enron, for that matter.
And remember that a stock trading for 67 cents can go to 2 cents, and you are just as badly burned as if a stock trading for $67 went to $2. Still, there are many fine companies that, because of temporary setbacks, have suffered huge stock declines. If you want to go bottom-fishing, those stocks should be your piscatorial prey.
Yes, a firm whose stock has dropped sharply is often a firm that is in serious trouble, but many times the panicky overreaction of shareholders to bad news creates exceptional buying opportunities -- especially if the firm has strong management and a light debt burden.
How well can losers do? Here's a remarkable example:
The investing firm Foliofn.com offers 110 "ready-to-go Folios" -- that is, diversified portfolios of bonds or stocks, each with a theme, such as Mid-Cap Growth (medium-size companies that are increasing their profits quickly) and Minority Leaders (companies with the most minority members on their boards). Far and away the best-performing Folio right now is called Worst of 1999 -- a portfolio of the 30 stocks that declined the most in that year.
From its inception on April 6, 2000 -- the date that Foliofn.com itself got started -- through Dec. 31, 2001, these stocks have returned an amazing average of 45 percent, compared with a loss of 22 percent for the benchmark Standard & Poor's 500-stock index. Over the past 12 months, the Worst of 1999 portfolio has beaten the market by 87 percentage points! By contrast, a folio comprising the best-performing stocks of 1999 has declined 51 percent since its inception.
Simply betting on big losers, however, is not a brilliant strategy. Investing isn't that easy. Some stocks take a punch and never get up from the canvas again. But it makes good sense to use a list of losers as the starting point for finding good companies to buy and hold for the long term. Just remember that each loser has its own story. Here are some from the list of 1999 worsts:
What about more recent losers? The Worst of 2000 Folio managed a loss of just 2 percent in 2001, beating the S&P by about nine percentage points. But unlike the 1999 list, which was well-balanced, this one is overwhelmingly high-tech, with stocks like Lucent Technologies, RealNetworks, Novell and Xerox. Also, a single year tells you little about any portfolio. Give it some time.
- General Cable Corp., which makes copper and aluminum wire and fiber-optic conduits for communications, energy and electrical markets, fell from $20.50 to $7.56 in 1999 and then kept dropping -- to a low of $4.20 late in 2000. While the company was shaky and debt-heavy, it managed to reorganize by selling off many of its foreign subsidiaries. It's now trading at $13.53, with earnings projected at about 70 cents a share for 2002, for a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 20.
General Cable's diversification has kept it from completely tanking, the way many other fiber-optic specialists have. Still, this is a firm exposed to the strong winds of competition in a business where brand names don't mean much. It may still be cheap, but it probably should not be an addition to your portfolio.
- Henry Schein Inc., which is a wonderful company and one of the great success stories in the group. It's a distributor of health-care products to medical doctors, veterinarians and dentists. The stock fell from $44.75 to $13.31 in 1999, mainly because profits didn't rise as much as expected and sales growth began to slow. But the next year the stock nearly tripled, shooting back up to $34.63. It currently trades at $43.17 and is rated "1" (among the top 100 of all stocks) by the Value Line Investment Survey.
Schein is a solid company, with little debt, in an excellent business. Since it went public in 1995, it's increased profits every year at an annual rate of better than 20 percent. It currently trades at a P/E of 25, which is not too expensive for such a fast-growing company. You could have bought it for a P/E of just 11 in 2000, though. Schein is the kind of company you can ask your own doctor or dentist about, but it looks like a keeper.
- Waste Management Inc., the largest solid-waste disposal company in North America, with sales of $11 billion last year, suddenly lost three-quarters of its stock value in 1999 after an unproductive merger. The sharp decline was a sign something was terribly wrong and, indeed, earnings plummeted the next year. Since then the company has restructured, selling nearly all its non-U.S. operations, and the stock has recovered from $14 to about $30 -- but that's still far from the 1999 high of $60. Waste Management is heavily burdened with debt and, despite its powerful position in a sector that can only grow, does not appear to be the kind of company most investors will want to own for the long term.
The 2000 list, however, amply demonstrates that what goes down can keep going down. InfoSpace Inc., for example, hit a high of $138.50 a share that year and finished at just $5.40. Did it bounce back? Nope. Currently, the Internet-infrastructure company trades at 2.26. Similarly, Sapient Corp., an e-services consulting firm, fell from $74.50 to $8.90 in 2000 and now trades at $5.23.
The point, however, is not to judge a stock by its price movement but rather by the likely success of the underlying company. Consider Yahoo Inc., the world's most-visited Internet site (132 million consumers in the latest month). It fell 90 percent in 2000 and earned a place in the Worst Folio. In 2001 it fell by another50 percent. But in the high-tech, high-risk portion of your portfolio (a tiny portion, let's hope), Yahoo may deserve a place. Value Line expects Yahoo to earn $70 million next year on revenue of $820 million. Within five years, analysts predict, the company will see profits of about $1 a share for a stock recently trading around $18.50 -- though such projections are notoriously inaccurate. Yahoo has no debt and about $1 billion in cash.
While some stocks fall and never come back, others stage magnificent long-term rallies -- often as the result of a change of management or strategy. International Business Machines Corp. is a good example. Between 1991 and 1993, its stock fell by 70 percent, but since then it has risen by a factor of 12, not including dividends.
Your job is to find stocks that will make similar comebacks. Candidates abound, in nearly every sector. Hewlett-Packard? Campbell Soup? Cisco Systems? Newell Rubbermaid? Companies like these -- firms with strong track records that have fallen on bad times -- present far, far better opportunities for long-term profit than Kmart or Enron, even at less than a buck a
JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.
01/24/02: Dare to be obscure
01/16/02: Bank on this
01/10/02: What goes down...
01/04/02: An asset-focused investor finds 'deep value' stocks
12/26/01: High-Tech Funds Low On Tech
12/19/01: Tech Sector: Blodget, Meeker, and You
12/12/01: Enron's lessons: Be skeptical of experts
12/04/01: CLECs alive and well, but not if Tauzin-Dingell passes
11/15/01: The "Next Big Thing" in Technology?
10/30/01: A National I.D. Card? Yes; Run By Larry Ellison? No
10/25/01: Without Bayer, we're bare to bioterror
10/18/01: The Battle of Biotech
10/05/01: Two Techs for Tough Times
09/26/01: The Information War
09/05/01: Tech firms built to last through tough times
08/23/01: Stocks on the A-List
08/17/01: Labor and management finding online learning to their liking
08/08/01: Game makers poised to profit
07/19/01: Trade Promotion Authority: High-Techís Key Component for Competitiveness
07/12/01: Nothingís arbitrary about the contrarians
06/27/01: Look to Politics to Find Broadband's Market Cap Shortfall
06/22/01: Tech Commodity Buys Available for Mining
06/18/01: The Blackout Portfolio
06/14/01: The conservation myth stars as latest (sub)urban legend
06/07/01: Will America go high tech on the high seas?
06/05/01: 'Price gouging' doesn't cut it as reason for rising energy prices
06/01/01: Authentication tools opening up opportunities in online security
05/25/01: 'Price gouging' doesnít cut it as reason for rising energy prices
05/21/01: Banking on High-Tech Education
05/17/01: It's No Time to Go Wobbly on Kyoto
05/02/01: Diversify with techís leaders
04/26/01: To Revive The New Economy, Release A Chokehold Break Up The Bells
04/24/01: Whoís To Blame For Broadband Crisis? Wired Article Points To Bells
04/19/01: The Bush Budget
04/12/01: To revive The New Economy, release a chokehold --- break up the Bells
04/04/01: Even as stocks have fallen, the Net keeps booming
03/28/01: Whereís The Profit In Biotech Future?
03/22/01: The Joy of Debt: The last thing we should want is a U.S. Treasury flush with cash
03/19/01: 'Defensive' Stocks in the NASDAQ
03/15/01: Bush administration must say no to Jane and Kyoto
03/08/01: Time to buy small caps? Consider these five great techs
03/01/01: Billís and Larryís continued political adventures
02/26/01: Chips on the Dips?
02/23/01: How Tauzin Can Keep His Word And Stop Telecom "Remonopolization"
02/13/01: Consumers, WAKE UP! Middlemen are ripping you off
02/02/01: Publicity-Seeking Politicians and Contingency-Fee Lawyers Corrupt the Law
01/26/01: DoubleClick, eBay And Their Promising Ilk
01/24/01: Will Cyberspace Look Like France or America?
12/27/00: Cut interest, taxes and regulation to save high-tech economy
12/20/00: Close, But No Big Czar
12/15/00: A Down Year? Maybe. But Letís Put It in Perspective
12/13/00: Clintonís sorry midnight race into history
12/07/00: Is Telecomís Future The Bells, The Bells, and Only The Bells?
12/01/00: Money talks and walks in election aftermath
11/29/00: Climate Treaty Deadlock Shows Lack of Consensus and Common Sense
11/23/00: Climate change participants donít listen to reasons for uncertainty
11/21/00: Will Regulators Create a Recession?
11/14/00: The Election and the Market
10/26/00: Hang on for the long term
10/25/00: On privacy, one size doesnít fit all
10/24/00: Perish the bearish thought
10/19/00: Beating hunger --- the biggest prize
10/13/00: Way to play biotech
10/12/00: Bush vs. Gore on Technology
10/11/00: Global Climate Scare: Fools Rush In
10/05/00: Avoid the Apple Trap
10/03/00: Goodbye, anti-Microsoft crusader --- and good riddance
09/29/00: Should You Invest in Tech IPOs?
09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Donít Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the Amazon.com
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When Itís Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap
© 2002, Tech Central Station