Jewish World Review Feb. 10, 2004 / 18 Shevat, 5764

Lou Dobbs

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

American jobs must be protected | The unemployment rate has fallen to its lowest level in two years. Businesses created 112,000 new jobs in January - the best performance since December 2000. But typically at this stage of economic recovery, the economy should be generating 200,000 to 300,000 new jobs each month.

There are two principal reasons why that's not occurring, in my opinion. First, companies are working their employees harder and longer, which results in higher productivity but diminished hiring. The second, and by far the more insidious, influence at work is the corporate exporting of American jobs to cheap overseas labor markets. This exporting of America simply has to stop if we are to preserve the American dream for our middle class.

Powerful corporate lobbies in Washington insist that outsourcing jobs overseas is beneficial to business, whose interest they represent. As a result, Congress has yet to take action to stem the hemorrhaging of American jobs. The Bush administration doesn't even recognize the problem. And the corporate mantra of efficiency, productivity and competitiveness is nothing more than 21st century code for cheap labor and, in some cases, slave labor.

The Business Roundtable, the National Association of Manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have come together to defend their use of cheap foreign labor to Congress. Business groups also have begun sounding the usual anti-protectionist cries in response to the recent passage of the Senate spending bill, which includes a provision forbidding offshore outsourcing by some government contractors. Tita Freeman of the Business Roundtable, for instance, was quick to assert that "isolating ourselves from the worldwide arena is not the answer."

But if we are to maintain a thriving workforce and a thriving national economy, outsourcing to the cheapest foreign bidder is not the answer. Forrester Research estimates that $136 billion in wages will be shifted from the United States to lower-wage countries by 2015.

Business groups claiming that outsourcing is good for the U.S. economy have simply gotten it wrong.

Donate to JWR

"Their argument rests on the fact that American workers who are displaced by this exportation are re-employed pretty quickly at equivalent jobs, says Ron Hira, a professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Right now, that's not happening."

In fact, in every state except Nevada and Nebraska, high-paying jobs lost in the recession are being replaced by work in lower-paying industries.

What's worse is that we do not have any concrete data, on a national level, to fully analyze the scope of the problem. Currently, the federal government compiles no statistics regarding how many jobs have been lost to cheap overseas labor.

In addition to maintaining better data on the outsourcing of employment overseas, the U.S. government also needs to curtail misuse of L-1 visas. Last week, the House International Relations Committee heard testimony from Americans who have lost their jobs to foreigners who hold the controversial form of work visa. Congress has been considering legislation that would drastically cut the number of foreign workers corporations can bring into this country. But to date, none of those bills has come to a vote.

These visas were intended to help bring in guest workers temporarily, as a last resort and not as a first choice.

"My research shows that those visa programs are being used to accelerate the process of exporting jobs," Hira says. "It's one thing ask American technology workers to compete with low-cost labor from halfway around the world, but to ask them to compete with low-cost labor from down the street is just unreasonable."

American workers can compete with workers in any part of the world, but they're not being asked to compete - they're being asked to give up their standard of living and their quality of life.

Either corporate America must find a conscience, or Congress must find the will to preserve the American dream. Call it protectionism if you will. But since when is the American middle class not worthy of protection?

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Lou Dobbs is the anchor and managing editor of CNN's "Lou Dobbs Moneyline." Comment by clicking here.

0//03/04: Dangerously dependent
01/27/04: Who's working for working Americans?
01/20/04: U.S. selling itself short with "free" trade
01/12/04: Bush on the wrong track with immigration idea
01/05/04: Business leaders should resolve to lead by example in 2004
12/29/03: Immigration needs stricter, not looser, controls
12/11/03: Trade deficit with China a big problem
12/09/03: Let our children be children
12/01/03: Broken borders pose a serious health risk
11/25/03: Free trade costs plenty
11/18/03: European Union is playing a dangerous game
11/10/03: This time, it's not the economy
11/04/03: Overseas outsourcing is an alarming trend
10/28/03: Spending so much time 'making a living', we don't live
10/21/03: As population soars, U.S. faces tough choices
10/14/03: Schools need to re-emphasize math and science
10/07/03: It's lonely at the top
09/30/03: Is America over-medicating?
09/23/03: Corporate execs need to stop selling out U.S. workers
09/16/03: The scandals just keep on coming
09/09/03: Let's get real on energy
09/02/03: Is free enterprise the answer to education woes?
08/26/03: Building the road to recovery
08/12/03: War on drugs is still a war worth fighting
08/06/03: An attack on progressive thought
07/29/03: Prosperity begins at home
07/22/03: Real earnings, or really creative earnings?
07/15/03: Flirting with disaster
07/08/03: It's good to be the king
07/01/03: Border disorder
06/24/03: Prairie dogs and mosquito bogs
06/17/03: Bullish on America
06/10/03: Retirement realities: we need new solutions — soon
06/03/03: Curing what ails us
05/27/03: America's export problem
05/21/03: Wall Street's new imperative: Integrity
/13/03: Losing sight of the dangers in creating further fiscal stimulus
05/06/03: Optimism is unfashionable, but here's some anyway
04/29/03: Nuclear nightmare
04/22/03: Naysayers ignore signs of economic recovery
04/15/03: Game over--but for whom?
04/08/03: No more fool's games
03/31/03: United States must seriously review foreign economic and political relationships
03/24/03: Delusional Chirac may be a thorn in coalition's side, but new alliances are forming in response to 21st-Century threats without him and UN
03/18/03: Bush critics offer little more than hyperbole
03/11/03: Geopolitical visibility
03/04/03: Freedom: Our best export
02/27/03: Guns, butter and greasing the way
02/18/03: Looking for a silver lining
02/10/03: Space program remains a valuable investment
02/04/03: Hi pal, come back
01/28/03: Bush address a chance to bolster confidence
01/22/03: Here we go again!
01/14/03: Bush's bold bid
01/07/03: The only thing certain is uncertainty
12/30/02: No need to be so negative as new year approaches
12/23/02: NY's AG deserves credit for settlement
12/18/02: Critics of Bush nominees should tone down rhetoric
12/09/02: A lot rides on prez's Treasury pick
12/04/02: A fast fix for corporate credibility?
11/26/02: Urge to merge is hard to resist
11/19/02: Are we really so bad off?
11/12/02: Bush's lucky week bodes well for recovery
11/05/02: Wall Street firms treat investors as fools
10/29/02: Earnings estimates offer some hope
10/22/02: Economy's strength tied to national security
10/17/02: Harvey Pitt, get real!
10/08/02:Are we experiencing the fall before the rise?
10/01/02: Concerns about earnings are justified
09/24/02: Business leaders must abandon stall tactics
09/17/02: Wall Street's reality check
09/12/02: There's no better time for leaders to show resolve


© 2003, TMS