Jewish World Review Dec. 4, 2000 / 7 Kislev, 5761
Debunking Gore myths
AL GORE is seeking to perpetuate a number of myths in furtherance of his obsessive quest to fulfill his childhood dream. He is
speaking with forked tongue because the truth does not benefit his presidential ambitions.
These myths are the foundational currency of Gore's post-election propaganda campaign, and must be continually debunked, even if
some of them have been around for weeks.
Myth One: That Gore is seeking to have every vote counted in Florida.
Gore, in his interview with NBC's Claire Shipman, said that the way to remove the potential cloud over the election is to count
every vote. "That is so simple and clear to me that I just feel so strongly about it. If people vote, their votes have to be
Shipman, in a rare moment in the 45-minute softball interview, challenged Gore's assertion. "Don't you think that if you get votes
counted in part of Florida, but not other parts of Florida where there are also ballots that were undercounted and sitting there,
that will also be viewed as ..." Gore, rather than answer her question, interrupted, sidestepped and dissembled. He responded that
"both campaigns had an equal opportunity to go out and register voters. Both had an equal opportunity to get people to turn out to
the polls." And, both sides had an equal opportunity to contest the election results.
So what? What does that have to do with the question? Gore's answer, translated, is: Last one to the courthouse is a rotten egg. In
Gore's own words this is not about counting all votes but winning the election through strategically placed judicial strikes.
Plus, Gore definitely didn't want all the military votes recounted.
Myth Two: That every candidate, upon request, is automatically entitled to a manual recount under Florida law.
"Candidates," said Gore, "are given the right under the law to say, 'Look. This election is close enough that the ballots that
haven't been counted could make the difference, so you have to count 'em.'"
This is false. It's true that each candidate has a right to request a manual recount, but the county canvassing boards are not
required to honor the request. Even some Republicans have bought into this misstatement of the Florida law. The law provides that
either candidate may request a manual recount in any county. When such a request is made the county's canvassing board may
then conduct a manual recount of 1 percent of the county's total votes in at least three precincts. If such 1 percent sampling
indicates "an error in the vote tabulation which could affect the outcome of the election," the board may, but is not
required to, conduct a full manual recount. Florida legislators involved with drafting and enacting this statute say that "an error
in vote tabulation" means a machine error.
So, in the absence of fraud, before the canvassing board may order a full manual recount, its 1 percent sampling must show
that there were sufficient machine errors that could affect the outcome of the election. No one -- even on the Gore team -- contends
that there were any machine errors. So, under the statute, none of the four counties had the statutory authority to conduct full
manual recounts. Even if you ignore the statutory requirement for a machine error, the county canvassing boards still wouldn't have
been required to conduct a full manual recount; their decision as to whether or not to do so is purely optional and within their
discretion. Public officials cannot be forced (through a writ of mandamus) to perform an act over which they have discretion.
Miami-Dade acted wholly within its discretion in declining to conduct a full manual recount. Therefore, Gore's lawsuit to force
Miami-Dade to complete its manual recount is without merit.
Myth Three: Not every vote was counted. Gore is trying to create the impression that the machines ignored properly cast ballots and
thereby disenfranchised voters. To the contrary, many voters consciously chose not to cast a vote for president, despite voting for
other offices. And, some voters didn't cast their votes correctly despite explicit instructions on the ballot to punch all the way
through and to leave no hanging chads. Many voters may have erred, but not the machines. Gore says that he's "in love with
democracy." Another myth? I'll let you
commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
11/29/00: Defending the smaller principles
11/27/00: Albert O'Gore and the little people
11/22/00: Doing 'anything to win'
11/15/00: Enough is enough, Mr. Gore
11/13/00: Al Gore: Thy country or thyself?
11/08/00: Bill and Al: Your time is up
11/06/00:The impending Bush mandate
11/01/00: Can't stop thinkin' 'bout tomorrow
10/30/00: George: Give Gore the ball back
10/25/00: Mr. Gore: A few more questions
10/23/00: It's the big government, stupid
10/18/00: Gore's down, so will he panic?
10/16/00: We're fresh out of new Al Gores
10/11/00: Gore: Fuzzy math = dirty politics
10/10/00:Gore: Renaissance man or unbalanced?
10/04/00: Where have you been, Albert Jr.?
10/02/00: Clintonís fragmented presidency
09/27/00: Liberal media doth protest too much
09/25/00: AlGore: Turning dreams into nightmares
09/20/00: Something fishy's going on
09/18/00: It's the liberalism, stupid
09/13/00: An open letter to open-minded cynics
09/11/00: The virtues of going negative
09/06/00: On a mission for marriage
09/04/00: Al Gore's 'Trivial Pursuits'
08/30/00: Lieberman and the paradox of liberal 'tolerance'
08/28/00: A campaign divided against itself
08/23/00: Al Gore's trickle-down populism
08/21/00: Prosperity without a clue
08/16/00: AlGore can run but he can't hide
08/14/00: When hate speech is OK
08/09/00: Bush: The pundits' enigma
08/07/00: GOP convention: Live or Memorex?
08/02/00: The first attack dog
07/31/00: The Cheney taint?
07/26/00: The anti-gun bogeyman
07/24/00: The raging culture war
07/19/00: Is Hillary 'Good for the Jews'?
07/17/00: How dare you, George?
07/12/00: Jacoby's raw deal
07/10/00: The perplexities of liberalism
07/05/00: Big Al and big oil
07/03/00: Partial-birth and total death
06/28/00: Some questions for you, Mr. Gore
06/26/00: Supreme Court assaults religious freedom
06/21/00: Waco: We are the jury
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?
© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.