Jewish World Review August 2, 2000 / 29 Tamuz, 5760
The first attack dog
WITH ONLY a half year left in his reign, his legacy starving for some
substance, and Al and Hillary getting all the attention, it must be
awfully tough to be Bill Clinton right now.
Apparently overcome by the urge to recapture the spotlight, the
president threw a couple of tantrums over the last few days in Boston
and Chicago. His rhetoric was remarkably unpresidential -- or should I
say "unremarkably"? Since his understudy is now running for president
instead of him, I suppose it's appropriate that Clinton has donned the
role of head attack dog, making his role reversal with Gore complete.
Before launching into his diatribe against George Bush, Dick Cheney,
Senate and House Republicans and the GOP in general, Clinton said there
is no need for negative campaigning this year. I guess he meant there is
no need for negative campaigning other than by him.
In Boston, Clinton ridiculed Bush to an audience of Democrats replete
with Kennedys. Clinton said that Bush thinks he ought to be president
because "(his) daddy was president." He then mocked Bush and Republicans
for trying to appear "compassionate and humane."
Anxious to demonstrate his point, Clinton railed against Republicans
for failing to act on his proposal to raise the minimum wage by a dollar
to $6.15 an hour. Republicans, he said "were still working overtime to
give tax breaks to the tiniest, wealthiest fraction of America's
families and still doing nothing for the 10 million people who would
benefit from a boost in the minimum wage."
A few days later Clinton spoke to a group of trial lawyers, who
presumably were not among those 10 million. Wisely, he chose not to
emphasize his patented class warfare themes before that group, which
collectively paid him a handsome quarter million at their modest little
luncheon. Instead, he focused on more uplifting themes, such as racist
Senate Republicans blocking his judicial appointments of blacks and
Hispanics. Before you assume I'm exaggerating, take a look at the
president's words: "I've been trying for seven long years to fix that,
and they've blocked every one. They're so determined to keep an
African-American off that they have allowed a 25 percent vacancy rate."
Nothing negative about that, Mr. Clinton.
In a frenzy to outdo himself, Clinton topped it off with a swipe at
Dick Cheney. He reminded the group how Cheney had voted against
recommending freedom for Nelson Mandela, saying it "takes your breath
|No comment necessary|
It didn't take Cheney's breath away. He had plenty left to refute
these bogus and incendiary charges on the Sunday talk shows. Cheney
explained that in 1986 he voted against a nonbinding resolution calling
for Mandela's release because it was packaged with a resolution calling
for U.S. recognition of Mandela's African National Congress, "a
terrorist organization." Cheney said that while he had always supported
efforts to free Mandela, he could not in good conscience support a
Clinton wasn't out of breath either because he went on to tie the two
issues (minority judicial appointments and Mandela) together. He likened
his failed African-American and Hispanic judicial appointments to
Mandela, saying they are "being held in a political jail because they
can't get a hearing from this Republican Senate."
A somewhat loftier theme emerged in Clinton's speeches over the
weekend. He contended that Democrat ideas are so superior that
Republicans are now trying to blur the distinctions between the parties.
Clinton has it exactly wrong. While Bush will bring a message of
inclusion to the "Philadelphia convention" -- that has a nice ring to it
-- he is not recommending that the party abandon its principles. A
review of the platform, which Bush endorsed, confirms a Republican Party
that is quite unashamed of its conservative positions. On all of the
substantive platform battles, including abortion, gays in the military,
promoting English as the nation's common language, limiting the role of
the federal government in education, and even abstinence education,
I wonder if Al Gore sometimes wishes his boss would be a little less
conspicuous on the campaign trial. For a study in contrasts, look to the
Republican convention for a glimpse at the type of leadership timber
George Bush wants to bring to this country. Perhaps Dick Cheney said it
best: "We want to make Americans proud again by giving them a president
commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
07/31/00:The Cheney taint?
07/26/00: The anti-gun bogeyman
07/24/00: The raging culture war
07/19/00: Is Hillary 'Good for the Jews'?
07/17/00: How dare you, George?
07/12/00: Jacoby's raw deal
07/10/00: The perplexities of liberalism
07/05/00: Big Al and big oil
07/03/00: Partial-birth and total death
06/28/00: Some questions for you, Mr. Gore
06/26/00: Supreme Court assaults religious freedom
06/21/00: Waco: We are the jury
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?
© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.