Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 12, 2000 / 9 Tamuz, 5760

David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Jacoby's raw deal


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- THE LIBERAL THOUGHT POLICE have silenced another dissenting voice. The Boston Globe has cleansed itself from the filthy rags of right wing opinion by canning its only conservative columnist, Jeff Jacoby.

Am I exaggerating by saying he was "canned"? Not a bit. The Globe euphemistically referred to Jacoby's firing as a four-month suspension, after which there would be a "serious rethink" of the "kind of column" he writes. A serious rethink? What kind of psychobabble is that?

Jacoby's stated infraction was "serious journalistic misconduct" regarding his July 3 column on the fate of the signers of the Declaration of Independence. As bad as it sounds "serious journalistic misconduct" is probably euphemistic, too. The Globe complained that "the structure and content of (Jacoby's) column were not entirely original." It sounds like they wanted to nab him for plagiarism but couldn't marshal the proof, so they went with the lesser-included non-offense of "serious journalistic misconduct."

In an e-mail to friends Jacoby described the process by which he researched and wrote the piece. He said he had before him three pieces, by Paul Harvey, Rush Limbaugh (Jr.) and a reader's e-mail. He then set about to verify the accuracy of the piece through independent research.

Jacoby said it never occurred to him to mention that he was "far from the first to write about the fates of the Declaration's signers." Globe officials told Jacoby that had he added such a disclosure his "suspension" could have been averted. I'm sorry, but that dog just won't hunt. Jacoby offered to include such a statement in his next column but permission was denied. The writing was already on the wall -- in fact it may be that they were looking for an excuse.

The Globe insists that its own credibility was at stake. Maybe so, but not the kind of credibility you might be thinking about. We are not talking about credibility in the sense that Webster's would define it: "The capacity of being believed." No, we are talking about the Globe's pristine reputation among such arbiters of political correctness as, say, liberal actor, Alec Baldwin. I mean, what would he think of the Globe for permitting Jacoby to continue contaminating its pages? What about the arts-and-croissants coteries in Boston and New York? Or, Boston's favorite liberal factory, Harvard?

Instead of fretting about their own "credibility" they should be thinking about their employee, Jeff Jacoby. I thought liberals were champions of the little guy. In the process of preserving their "credibility" the Globe dealt a potentially devastating blow to Jacoby's credibility. I say "potentially" because I am confident that this superlative columnist, no thanks to the Globe, will go on to bigger and better things.

As others have accurately observed -- I want to make sure I include that disclosure so as not to incur the indignation of the Globe -- Jacoby's sin was neither plagiarism nor serious journalistic misconduct, but being a highly effective conservative columnist. That just won't do.

Isn't it fitting that the column the Globe conveniently used to dispatch Jacoby involved subject matter that is absolutely intolerable to the politically correct, history revisionist crowd. Who do conservatives think they are trying to glorify this evil nation's past with the "Patriot" movie and these written tributes to our founders?

I am convinced that Jeff Jacoby is a man of integrity who did not do anything improper in this case. I take him at his word that he "assumed that all of the material in (his) column was in the public domain." As a columnist I can tell you that it's not difficult to inadvertently borrow material or phrases sometimes. A few months ago I read a column by Lowell Ponte at frontpagemag.com that included the phrase, "Go left, young man." Not long after that I subconsciously co-opted that line for the title to a column. When Lowell graciously pointed it out to me I was embarrassed, but he knew it was accidental.

I am gratified that many have come to Jacoby's defense, including my brother Rush, Binyamin Jolkovsky of Jewish World Review, David Horowitz and Matt Drudge. Though it's painful for some to accept, free speech applies to everyone.


JWR contributor David Limbaugh is an attorney practicing in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and a political analyst and commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

WND

Up

07/10/00: The perplexities of liberalism
07/05/00: Big Al and big oil
07/03/00: Partial-birth and total death
06/28/00: Some questions for you, Mr. Gore
06/26/00: Supreme Court assaults religious freedom
06/21/00: Waco: We are the jury
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/29/00: Phantasma-Gore-ia
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
01/03/00: McMedia?
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?

© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.