Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review March 20, 2000 /13 Adar II, 5760

David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
David Corn
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports
Newswatch

Econophone

Trakdata


Stop the insanity


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- I RECEIVED some interesting e-mails in response to my last column. Last time I wrote that Republicans have nothing to fear from the dirty campaign that Al Gore is guaranteed to wage against George Bush. There is plenty of ammo available against Gore, and Bush appears to be prepared to use it.

One e-mailer was pleased that I had focused on the "the extreme tactics Gore has been using against both Bill Bradley and George Bush" and wondered whether Gore's tactics represented the "last, doomed efforts of a political establishment whose time is past." Another took me to task for assassinating Gore's character. I'll respond to both.

The first e-mailer has obviously concluded that liberalism is a bankrupt ideology and that liberal candidates must avoid genuine policy debates and instead resort to underhanded methods to have any hope of winning the election.

I do not believe that liberalism is dead or that it ever will be. The ideas represented by modern liberalism have flourished more in history than those of modern conservatism. Historically, freedom has been the exception to the rule of tyranny, the logical extension of unbridled liberalism.

I do not mean to imply that American liberals consciously promote tyranny. But they do tend to advocate an approach to government that is inimical to our political freedoms and would eventually lead to their demise.

Because this nation was founded in liberty and is the beneficiary of its freedom-preserving Constitution and its free-market economy, many assume that freedom is not threatened by government largesse. Having never experienced the absence of freedom, they don't understand the inverse relationship between governmental power and individual freedoms or the trade-off between freedom and security.

So there will always be well-meaning idealists who believe that government should be the primary distributor of resources. And for many of them, it isn't just a matter of ideology, but theology. Even empirical evidence, such as the abject failure of liberalism's Great Society, will not shake their faith.

Apart from ideology or theology, liberalism would still not be in jeopardy. While liberalism may be in disfavor with a majority of the electorate on general ideological grounds, there remains a formidable plurality of voters, consisting mostly of special interest, government-dependency groups, whose survival depends on its survival. They will continue to empower those politicians who will feed their dependencies.

But to be honest, I doubt that conservatism is a majority ideology in this country anymore either. Even if the country is "basically conservative," too many voters are driven by things other than ideology to give either liberals or conservatives a clear majority on ideological grounds alone.

Why, then, is Al Gore going so negative? According to Clinton, Gore and many other prominent liberals, Republicans want to starve schoolchildren, eradicate clean air and pure water, allow people to die in gun accidents instead of standing up to the evil gun lobby, bankrupt Medicare and Social Security, oppress women and minorities and foster homelessness. Why this incessant scaremongering?

That's easy. They do it because it works. They are not ideologically bankrupt, but morally bankrupt. Clinton and Gore are not men of lofty ideals, but base political power brokers. They will say whatever they need to say and do whatever they need to do to acquire and maintain power.

But the appropriate question is not why these men are duplicitous, but what can be done to counter their deceit. And this brings me to the other e-mailer's criticism. To him I respond that conservatives are not assassinating Gore's character but facilitating his self-destruction by exposing his own lies and misconduct. While we must always try to persuade voters of the superiority of our ideas, we must also reveal the character flaws of those who would be president.

Until corrupt politicians are made accountable for their duplicity they will continue to deceive like unpunished juvenile delinquents. And since the major media refuses to do its job of exposing their lies, Republicans and the countercultural media, including conservative columnists and those noble purveyors of truth on talk radio must step in and fill the breach. If we refuse to do our part, then, like the indulgent parents of juvenile misfits, we become co-conspirators in the wrongdoing.

The nation cannot afford another four years of this insanity.


JWR contributor David Limbaugh is an attorney practicing in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and a political analyst and commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

WND

Up

03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
01/03/00: McMedia?
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?

© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.