Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Sept. 6, 2000 / 5 Elul, 5760

David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


On a mission for marriage


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- HAS THE CAUSE of family values been diminished in this country? Matt Daniels, executive director of the Alliance for Marriage, thinks so -- and is determined to do something about it.

Daniels, whose father left him and his mother to fend for themselves in Spanish Harlem when Daniels was just 2 years old, is an unlikely advocate for two-parent families. After all, he is living proof that kids from single-parent families can excel in our society.

He graduated from Dartmouth College in 1985 Phi Beta Kappa, magna cum laude, and obtained a law degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1996. He is currently a Ph.D. candidate in American politics at Brandeis University.

So, what is Daniels so exercised about? As a student of government and law, he understands that America's system of ordered liberty is dependent on an underlying infrastructure of moral values. Despite the genius of our Constitution, our freedoms will eventually collapse if the moral pillars undergirding them disintegrate.

This idea that the Constitution alone is not sufficient to sustain our liberties is no insult to the framers. They clearly understood this truth.

That's what John Adams meant when he said: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other." Similarly, Washington wrote, "Of all the dispositions and habits that lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports."

Daniels understands that these are more than lofty words. Family values are at the root of America's greatness. Yet they are under assault from powerful forces today.

Both major political parties acknowledge the fundamental importance of morality and family values in our society. Democratic vice presidential candidate Joseph Lieberman, who used the Adams and Washington quotes in a recent speech, has made such issues a central part of his campaign message.

Republicans have been promoting these themes for years, long before Dan Quayle's "Murphy Brown" speech.

Daniels, however, is concerned that the parties have sometimes allowed "family values" to become a surrogate for their partisan agendas. Politicians have so overused "children" and "family" that their meanings have been lost in a semantic jungle. To Daniels, "family values" has a specific meaning whose importance transcends politics.

A new Wirthin poll confirms that a great majority of Americans are convinced that marriage and families should be among our highest political priorities, more important than a clean environment (say 77 percent); a greater priority than increasing job opportunities (64 percent). Indeed, 92 percent say we cannot move forward as a nation without strengthening our families.

The Alliance for Marriage intends to put meaning back into the phrase "family values," to communicate that marriage and two-parent families are at its core. Two-parent families are not just important to their children, they are crucial to a healthy society. AFM points out that "a large and growing body of social science research indicates that the union of a man and woman in marriage is the single most beneficial social institution in the world."

Married men and women live longer, experience less depression, alcoholism and substance abuse, and have higher income and savings levels. Children of married parents experience less poverty, fewer emotional and psychological problems, lower rates of criminal behavior and substance abuse, and higher levels of educational achievement.

While too many politicians have been reluctant to boldly defend marriage, AFM has formulated an ambitious, non-partisan agenda to restore the sanctity of the institution.

"The goal here is not to blame single parents," Daniels says, emphasizing the often heroic efforts single mothers and fathers make to rear their children alone. "It's simply to get the word out about an important social truth."

In furtherance of refurbishing marriage and restoring a culture of married fatherhood in American society, AFM will work to reduce the tax burden on married families with children, attain increased tax incentives for adoption by married couples, require marital reconciliation counseling as a precondition to divorce, eliminate all welfare policies that penalize married welfare recipients, fund public-education programs emphasizing the importance of marriage and support community efforts encouraging fathers to commit to marriage.

It is refreshing that another powerful voice has emerged to challenge the nostrums of political correctness. Godspeed to Matt Daniels and the Alliance for Marriage.



JWR contributor David Limbaugh is an attorney practicing in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and a political analyst and commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

WND

Up

09/04/00: Al Gore's 'Trivial Pursuits'
08/30/00: Lieberman and the paradox of liberal 'tolerance'
08/28/00: A campaign divided against itself
08/23/00: Al Gore's trickle-down populism
08/21/00: Prosperity without a clue
08/16/00: AlGore can run but he can't hide
08/14/00: When hate speech is OK
08/09/00: Bush: The pundits' enigma
08/07/00: GOP convention: Live or Memorex?
08/02/00: The first attack dog
07/31/00: The Cheney taint?
07/26/00: The anti-gun bogeyman
07/24/00: The raging culture war
07/19/00: Is Hillary 'Good for the Jews'?
07/17/00: How dare you, George?
07/12/00: Jacoby's raw deal
07/10/00: The perplexities of liberalism
07/05/00: Big Al and big oil
07/03/00: Partial-birth and total death
06/28/00: Some questions for you, Mr. Gore
06/26/00: Supreme Court assaults religious freedom
06/21/00: Waco: We are the jury
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/29/00: Phantasma-Gore-ia
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
01/03/00: McMedia?
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?

© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.