Jewish World Review Jan. 12, 2000 / 16 Teves 5761
Clinton doing Bush no favors in Mideast
PRESIDENT-ELECT George W. Bush should stop praising President Clinton's last-ditch Middle East diplomacy. It's harming U.S. interests and creating problems for Bush's administration.
Clinton's diplomacy has rewarded Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's refusal to accept generous Israeli peace offers and has encouraged the Palestinians to think that violence will gain them support from the U.S. government.
If Clinton should somehow succeed in brokering a peace deal before he leaves office, Bush would be forced to fulfill its terms, which are likely to include stationing thousands of U.S. troops as peacekeepers between hostile parties.
If Clinton can't achieve an agreement, which seems highly likely, Bush still will be forced to deal with unrealistically high Palestinian expectations for America's role in pushing for concessions from Israel.
In his all-out effort to achieve peace -- and perhaps win a Nobel Peace Prize -- Clinton may even have sown the seeds for a regional war.
For sure, he has encouraged Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak to make so many concessions that he's on the verge of near certain defeat at the hands of right-wing hawk Ariel Sharon in the Feb. 6 elections.
Whenever he's asked about Clinton's peace efforts, Bush says, correctly, that the United States has just one president at a time. On a number of occasions, though, he has said he's "impressed" by Clinton's peace efforts and "we hope it works."
These statements presumably supercede the more sober assessment made Dec. 17 by Vice President-elect Dick Cheney, who said he had "concerns that the way the Clinton administration operated in the last year or so ... has made it more difficult to reach a settlement."
About Clinton's Camp David summit between Arafat and Barak in July, Cheney said, "The Israeli government has collapsed, in part as a result of the way those negotiations were handled or mishandled."
At Camp David, Arafat turned down an offer from Barak that would give the Palestinians more than 90 percent of Arab territory occupied by Israel in 1967, recognition of a Palestinian state and partial control of Jerusalem.
In return, Arafat would have had to withdraw demands for 100 percent of the West Bank, sovereignty over Arab Jerusalem and the right of Palestinian refugees to return to Israel.
After Arafat's rejection, violence erupted in the area, with Palestinians using both rocks and automatic weapons. Clinton chided Arafat a few times, but basically the administration has adopted his agenda and helped him rehabilitate himself in world opinion.
In December, according to documents made public by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Clinton became the first American president to recognize a "right of return" by Palestinian refugees to homes they claim they lost when Israel was created in 1948.
According to minutes of a Dec. 13 White House meeting with negotiators from both sides, Clinton presented a peace plan that would "recognize the right of Palestinian refugees to return to Historic Palestine" or "to their homeland."
Clinton proposed that more than 2 million Palestinians living in foreign countries have the right to petition Israel for residency, which Israel could turn down. But they would be allowed to crowd into the new Palestinian state created on the West Bank.
Clinton also proposed that the Palestinian state have "sovereignty" over the Haram el Sharif, or Temple Mount, one of the holiest sites in Judaism as well as Islam.
Moreover, after Clinton met Arafat in Washington last week, the White House issued upbeat statements on Arafat's willingness to control violence and reach a deal -- although no independent evidence exists that he actually did so.
The effect was to give Arafat a PR boost while Israel is likely to take a beating, since Sharon holds a 20-point lead over Barak in the polls. Two-thirds of Israeli Jews oppose transfer of control over the Temple Mount.
Robert Satloff, director of the Washington Institute, said, "I've had high regard for Clinton's peace efforts over the past eight years, but the latest episode had tarnished the record. This is all about him, not about the best way to carve out an Arab-Israeli agreement."
Satloff said Clinton is on his way to handing Bush a set of Middle East outcomes that range "from bad to worse. None is good."
If Clinton achieves a deal and Barak somehow wins the election, Satloff said, Bush would have to carry out the agreement, whose "key" (according to Clinton in the December minutes) is "an international presence" to provide security.
Bush has been opposed to using U.S. troops as peacekeepers, especially in volatile areas such as Bosnia and Kosovo.
If Clinton wins an agreement and Sharon wins his election, the peace deal would collapse. Bush would have to cope with the consequences, which could include massive violence -- even violence across international borders.
If Clinton fails to achieve an agreement, violence also could erupt. And the Palestinians would expect Bush to adopt Clinton's plan as a starting point for diplomacy.
The bottom line is, next time he's asked, Bush should thank Clinton for trying in the Middle East, but he should also say that Clinton should know when to fold a losing
JWR contributor Morton Kondracke is executive editor of Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
01/09/01: Bush and Democrats can deal
12/14/00: Will Daschle make it his business to get along with President Bush?
12/08/00: GOP is in danger of ruining record on medical research
11/27/00: Some fascinating stories about how and why people voted
11/22/00: GOP Survived health bullets, but one is left
11/20/00: Can next president and Hill deal?
11/15/00: With nation split, leaders must reach across party divide
11/07/00: The Envelope, Please:Bush Beats Gore, GOP Holds Hill
11/03/00: Parties appeal to two 'gospels'
11/01/00: Lurking in the shadows
10/26/00: What's Gore's Social Security plan?
10/18/00: While Bush, Gore debate surplus, Congress spends it
10/16/00: Two debates leave lots of questions
10/03/00: What questions should be debated?
09/28/00: Gore and Bush should prepare to lead
09/19/00: Bush let values issue slip away
08/25/00: Gore hands center to Bush
08/22/00: AlGore, look to future, not to Bubba
08/08/00: 2000 race could leave high road for low
08/03/00: Convention must point Bush to center
08/01/00: GOP Readies 'Debt Lockbox' As 2000 Strategy
07/27/00: Cheney adds heft to GOP ticket
07/25/00: Foreign, Defense Policy Deserves Full 2000 Debate
07/20/00: Truman Show: Gore Replays 1948, But Bush Isn't Dewey
07/18/00: Bush Must Fight Gore's Drug Plan As 'Bad Medicine'
07/13/00: Mexico's Election Supports U.S. Action On NAFTA, Bailout
07/10/00: Abortion is good for something --- just ask AlGore
07/06/00: Meet Steve Ricchetti, Bubba's secret weapon
06/30/00: AlGore is down, but is he out?
06/27/00: Social programs caught in election-year game of one-up
06/22/00: Congress Is Near Flunking a Test On School Reform
06/16/00: Doting on the grandparents
06/13/00: On Stem Cells, Bush Has Wrong Pro-Life Stance
06/08/00: Has Gore Caught Bush?
05/26/00: PNTR Vote Could Tell Which Party Fits 'New Economy'
05/23/00: The secret to winning the election: Economic programs
05/18/00: Gore should regroup
05/16/00: McCain's Support Is Tepid, But Lets Bush Focus on Gore
05/11/00: Voters need wonk training
05/09/00: Bush Could Score With Charge That Gore's Too Partisan
04/28/00: Reno's force aids Clinton, not Elian
04/25/00: Should Clinton be indicted?
04/24/00: Can Gore win on Bush tax cuts?
04/18/00: Levin's 'bridge' key to China trade?
04/11/00: Congress, U.S. Voters Still Aren't Ready For Campaign Reform
04/06/00: Bush, Gore Silent As Popular Culture Gets Ever Coarser
03/30/00: Is 2000 Like 1948, 1976 or 1960? Or Is This Unparalleled?
03/28/00: Will Bush, Gore Go for a Better Way To Pick Nominees?
03/23/00: Medicare cutbacks bleed hospitals
03/20/00: Chances Improve That China Trade Will Pass Congress
03/16/00: Lieberman as veep would help Gore
03/14/00: Can Bush, McCain Unite to Beat Gore?
03/09/00: Can GOP Forge Unity After Nasty McCain-Bush Race?
03/07/00: What accounts for McCain's excesses?
03/02/00: 'Debate' Proved Gore Is This Year's Best Gut-Fighter
02/29/00: Surprises! The 2000 GOP race is full of it
02/25/00: Voters want centrist in White House
02/23/00: Gore would hit McCain's record
02/15/00: Will negativity hurt McCain in S.C.?
02/10/00: How hard should Bush hit McCain?
02/08/00: Bush must retool his entire campaign
01/27/00: Could Gore beat Bush as Truman beat Dewey?
01/20/00: Big New Surplus Estimates Could Alter 2000 Politics
12/21/99: Bush improves, everyone panders
12/16/99: Prospects improve for campaign reform
12/14/99: Riots raise free trade as 2000 issue
12/10/99: Gore won GOP 'debate' in N.H.
12/07/99: Election pits Bush cuts vs. Medicare boost
12/03/99: Can race be a constructive issue in 2000?
11/19/99: White House race may be best in decades
11/16/99: Where is Bush on health care fight?
11/11/99: Will TV stop profiteering from politics?
11/09/99: Is GOP isolationist, or just partisan?
11/04/99: Gore, Bradley Run Opposite Races On Style, Substance
11/01/99: GOP, Clinton could reach deal swiftly
10/27/99: Bush to fight 'culture wars' -- positively
10/21/99: Porter, Mack: heroes on medical research
10/19/99: Gore scores among party big shots, but polls go South
10/14/99: Bush critiques could help GOP Congress
10/12/99: Congress can save health care from ruin
10/07/99: Will gun-control cause the GOP to shoot itself in the foot?
10/05/99: Gore moves: Desperate but necessary
10/01/99: Fox, Armstrong make case for NIH
09/28/99: Dems' race brightens Bush's chances
09/23/99: East Timor deflates `Clinton Doctrine'
09/21/99: Buchanan v. Bush? Yeah right
09/17/99: Candidates turn attention to poverty
09/15/99: Bush's education problem
09/09/99: Budget makes 2000 an `issues' election
09/07/99:Airport rage increases, with good reason
09/02/99: U.S. future up for grabs in 2000
08/31/99: U.S. Capitol needs visitor's center -- soon
08/24/99: Will 2000 be the year of the foreign crisis?
08/19/99: Neither party has upper hand for '99
08/17/99: Ford gets freedom medal one month early
08/12/99: There's time to catch Bush, say Gore aides
08/10/99: Rudy, Hillary try much-needed makeovers
08/09/99: GOP must launch new probe of Chinagate
08/02/99: Pols blow fiscal smoke on budget surplus
08/02/99: One campaign reform should pass: disclosure
07/27/99: Gore leads Bush in policy proposals