Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 10, 2000 /7 Tamuz, 5760

Morton Kondracke

Kondracke
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Abortion is good for something --- just ask AlGore


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- VICE PRESIDENT Al Gore's presidential fortunes continued sinking last week, but the Supreme Court may have thrown him a lifeline by suggesting that abortion rights are endangered.

Striking down laws prohibiting partial-birth abortions by a margin of just 5-4, the court gave Gore the opportunity to declare that "women are just one vote away from losing their right to choose."

Gore was planning to make the power to nominate high court justices a major campaign issue sooner or later, but the Nebraska decision gave him and his allies in the abortion rights movement a chance to start early.

Most polls indicate that Gore is running about even with Texas Gov. George W. Bush among female voters, and abortion could be the lever Gore needs to pry them back into the Democratic column. The Los Angeles Times poll shows that voters have extremely complicated views about abortion but that 68 percent -- including 73 percent of women -- believe "it is a decision that has to be made by a woman and her doctor."

On other fronts last week, the news for Gore continued to be bad. The Gallup poll indicated that Bush's lead over Gore jumped from 4 to 13 percent last month. Both Democrats and Republicans doubted the margin was that big, but they saw no signs that the race is narrowing.

On the stump, Bush had the luxury of reaching out to groups not in the GOP orbit -- African-Americans, Hispanics, the disabled -- while Gore still was playing defense and trying to shore up the Democratic base. According to Gallup, only 63 percent of Democrats want their party to nominate Gore this year, while 25 percent prefer someone else. Among Republicans, 80 percent favor Bush and only 15 percent want someone else.

Gore came up with an energy policy, seemingly, to cope with GOP charges that the Clinton administration's lack of one had caused gasoline prices to rise.

He proposed a $75 billion plan to invest in alternative fuels and clean technology, seemingly, to keep environmentalists from bolting to Green Party nominee Ralph Nader.

At the same time he was coping with the Nader threat, he also had to assure auto workers and holiday drivers that he was not "anti-car," while Bush hammered him with citations from his 1992 book, "Earth in the Balance," calling for higher gasoline prices.

On top of all that, Gore had to punch his message through a fog of new charges that his 1996 fund-raising activities -- and his recollections about them under oath -- merited appointment of an independent counsel. In this stormy environment, the abortion issue opportunity represented a ray of light for Gore. Bush said he regretted the Nebraska decision but is unlikely to make it an important theme of his campaign.

Bush, while anti-abortion, has done his best to signal that he would not try to overturn the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision, declaring that women have a constitutional right to an early-term abortion.

Still, Bush has said that the justices he most admires are anti-Roe conservatives Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, two of the four who voted to uphold state bans on partial-birth abortions.

Gore declared, overstating somewhat, that "the next president will nominate at least three and probably four justices," potentially tipping the balance against abortion rights.

Three justices are over 70 years of age, including two -- Sandra Day O'Connor and John Paul Stevens -- who voted to strike down the Nebraska ban. Chief Justice William Rehnquist, a conservative, is the third septuagenarian.

Court experts say Gore also is overstating when he says that just one vote stands in the way of overturning Roe. It's actually two.

Other key abortion cases have been decided by a margin of 6-3, with Justice Anthony Kennedy voting to maintain abortion rights. Kennedy voted to uphold a ban on partial-birth abortions because he found the procedure "abhorrent."

The Times poll indicated that the public is conflicted about abortion. Fifty-seven percent of voters think that abortion "is murder," yet 85 percent would permit it when the mother's physical health is at stake, 54 percent when her emotional health is threatened.

Support for Roe is down to 43 percent, but it had been as high as 56 percent in 1991, when abortion rights were thought to be in danger.

This election year, nearly a quarter of all voters said that the power to appoint up to three justices would make them focus on abortion in determining their presidential selection.

Clearly, Gore is going to try to mobilize -- that is, scare -- pro-choice women to the polls. Bush might help him if it appears that his vice presidential selection has been dictated by the right-to-life movement.



JWR contributor Morton Kondracke is executive editor of Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up

07/06/00: Meet Steve Ricchetti, Bubba's secret weapon
06/30/00: AlGore is down, but is he out?
06/27/00: Social programs caught in election-year game of one-up
06/22/00: Congress Is Near Flunking a Test On School Reform
06/16/00: Doting on the grandparents
06/13/00: On Stem Cells, Bush Has Wrong Pro-Life Stance
06/08/00: Has Gore Caught Bush?
05/26/00: PNTR Vote Could Tell Which Party Fits 'New Economy'
05/23/00: The secret to winning the election: Economic programs
05/18/00: Gore should regroup
05/16/00: McCain's Support Is Tepid, But Lets Bush Focus on Gore
05/11/00: Voters need wonk training
05/09/00: Bush Could Score With Charge That Gore's Too Partisan
04/28/00: Reno's force aids Clinton, not Elian
04/25/00: Should Clinton be indicted?
04/24/00: Can Gore win on Bush tax cuts?
04/18/00: Levin's 'bridge' key to China trade?
04/11/00: Congress, U.S. Voters Still Aren't Ready For Campaign Reform
04/06/00: Bush, Gore Silent As Popular Culture Gets Ever Coarser
03/30/00: Is 2000 Like 1948, 1976 or 1960? Or Is This Unparalleled?
03/28/00: Will Bush, Gore Go for a Better Way To Pick Nominees?
03/23/00: Medicare cutbacks bleed hospitals
03/20/00: Chances Improve That China Trade Will Pass Congress
03/16/00: Lieberman as veep would help Gore
03/14/00: Can Bush, McCain Unite to Beat Gore?
03/09/00: Can GOP Forge Unity After Nasty McCain-Bush Race?
03/07/00: What accounts for McCain's excesses?
03/02/00: 'Debate' Proved Gore Is This Year's Best Gut-Fighter
02/29/00: Surprises! The 2000 GOP race is full of it
02/25/00: Voters want centrist in White House
02/23/00: Gore would hit McCain's record
02/15/00: Will negativity hurt McCain in S.C.?
02/10/00: How hard should Bush hit McCain?
02/08/00: Bush must retool his entire campaign
01/27/00: Could Gore beat Bush as Truman beat Dewey?
01/20/00: Big New Surplus Estimates Could Alter 2000 Politics
12/21/99: Bush improves, everyone panders
12/16/99: Prospects improve for campaign reform
12/14/99: Riots raise free trade as 2000 issue
12/10/99: Gore won GOP 'debate' in N.H.
12/07/99: Election pits Bush cuts vs. Medicare boost
12/03/99: Can race be a constructive issue in 2000?
11/19/99: White House race may be best in decades
11/16/99: Where is Bush on health care fight?
11/11/99: Will TV stop profiteering from politics?
11/09/99: Is GOP isolationist, or just partisan?
11/04/99: Gore, Bradley Run Opposite Races On Style, Substance
11/01/99: GOP, Clinton could reach deal swiftly
10/27/99: Bush to fight 'culture wars' -- positively
10/21/99: Porter, Mack: heroes on medical research
10/19/99: Gore scores among party big shots, but polls go South
10/14/99: Bush critiques could help GOP Congress
10/12/99: Congress can save health care from ruin
10/07/99: Will gun-control cause the GOP to shoot itself in the foot?
10/05/99: Gore moves: Desperate but necessary
10/01/99: Fox, Armstrong make case for NIH
09/28/99: Dems' race brightens Bush's chances
09/23/99: East Timor deflates `Clinton Doctrine'
09/21/99: Buchanan v. Bush? Yeah right
09/17/99: Candidates turn attention to poverty
09/15/99: Bush's education problem
09/09/99: Budget makes 2000 an `issues' election
09/07/99:Airport rage increases, with good reason
09/02/99: U.S. future up for grabs in 2000
08/31/99: U.S. Capitol needs visitor's center -- soon
08/24/99: Will 2000 be the year of the foreign crisis?
08/19/99: Neither party has upper hand for '99
08/17/99: Ford gets freedom medal one month early
08/12/99: There's time to catch Bush, say Gore aides
08/10/99: Rudy, Hillary try much-needed makeovers
08/09/99: GOP must launch new probe of Chinagate
08/02/99: Pols blow fiscal smoke on budget surplus
08/02/99: One campaign reform should pass: disclosure
07/27/99: Gore leads Bush in policy proposals

©1999, NEA