Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review May 16, 2000 /11 Iyar, 5760

Morton Kondracke

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


McCain's Support Is Tepid, But Lets Bush Focus on Gore -- IT ISN'T LOVE. There won't be a marriage. But Sen. John McCain's (R-Ariz.) endorsement of Texas Gov. George W. Bush (R) does cement party unity and removes a distraction from Bush's presidential campaign.

The linkup should have happened a lot sooner - and would have, according to advisers to both men, if Bush had called McCain right after the primaries instead of depending on intermediaries to patch up their differences.

Instead of salving wounds, GOP pros say, the go-betweens - even well-meaning ones like former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) - delayed a rapprochement.

Meantime, super-loyalists on each side created friction. Bush aides accused McCain of refusing to accept defeat. McCain aides couldn't get over the fact that they were beaten and stoked McCain's lasting anger over low blows leveled at him by the Bush campaign in South Carolina and New York.

"Both these guys are pretty macho," said one McCain ally. "Neither one wanted to be seen as weak. And John thought Bush was weak for not reaching out."

McCain aides say it was a pair of Bush phone calls Sunday that softened the mood and contributed to Tuesday's endorsement - one, 10 minutes long, that Bush had with McCain's 14-year-old son when the Senator wasn't home, and the second with McCain himself lasting just 2 minutes.

McCain said at their joint press conference that he would "enthusiastically" campaign for Bush, but it isn't clear what that means. McCain has a full schedule of campaign stops for GOP House candidates, his aides say.

Of course, that doesn't preclude hearty praise for Bush - or, more importantly, hearty blasts at Vice President Al Gore - but the vibes given off by McCain Tuesday suggest that he is some distance from being fully engaged on Bush's behalf.

"We are in agreement on more issues than we are in disagreement" was not exactly a ringing declaration from McCain. He called the Pittsburgh undertaking "medicine."

And McCain's six repetitions of the phrase "I endorse Governor Bush" came more in mockery of media questioning than as emphasis of his dedication to Bush's election.

McCain allies say he has not yet gotten over the thrill of the campaign trail. He has to half-hope that Bush loses in November so he can run again. He'll be 68 in 2004, so that probably will be his last chance to be president.

Despite his protestations that he does not want to be asked to be Bush's vice presidential running mate, some McCain allies think that if Bush said, "John, I need you. I really want you," McCain would accept.

"John has never said anything to this effect," said one adviser. "I'm reading body language. But he never says in a meeting, 'We've got to absolutely shut this down.' Instead, he asks for advice on how to handle the question."

The chances of Bush's offering McCain the nomination are next to nil, though. Bush values loyalty above almost every other political virtue, and McCain's chief characteristic is his independence, not his followership.

Party pros close to the Bush campaign think it's more likely Bush would pick a McCain backer like Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) or Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) rather than McCain himself, although Hagel comes from a small state and Thompson may not please conservatives.

There are no obvious veep favorites on the Republican side nowadays. Sen. Connie Mack (Fla.) has said in nearly Shermanesque terms that he wouldn't accept the nomination. Former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, who's in charge of vetting candidates, says he can't leave his business and votes in Texas, disqualifying him from the ticket.

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, a pro-choice Catholic, may have muffed his chances by calling for repeal of the anti-abortion plank in the GOP platform, which Bush wants to keep.

Ridge is barred by his bishop from making speeches or appearances on church property, which Republican pros say could affect Bush's already-shaky position among Catholic voters.

Rep. John Kasich (Ohio) is a swing-state Catholic whom Bush has come to like, but some ex-House colleagues say his excitable ways may give him a "gravitas problem." Another Catholic, Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating, is close to Bush, but likely would attract mainly conservatives already in Bush's camp, not moderates and independents.

Sen. Bill Frist (Tenn.), while attractive and capable of making Gore's home state vulnerable, has family ties to the unpopular HMO industry that Democrats might attack.

Former Education Secretary and ex-Tennessee Gov. Lamar Alexander's name has returned to the speculation list, though he's been out of sight since giving up his presidential candidacy in February.

Of the two leading female veep possibilities, New Jersey Gov. Christy Whitman would deeply offend pro-life Republicans and many GOP pros doubt that former Transportation Secretary Elizabeth Dole is up to being president, a key Bush criterion.

So, Bush's choice of a veep won't be easy. But he has the luxury of a lead on Gore. And, if he handles McCain right, perhaps he can get the former war hero to vent his reformers' indignation on Gore.

JWR contributor Morton Kondracke is executive editor of Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill. Send your comments to him by clicking here.


05/11/00: Voters need wonk training
05/09/00: Bush Could Score With Charge That Gore's Too Partisan
04/28/00: Reno's force aids Clinton, not Elian
04/25/00: Should Clinton be indicted?
04/24/00: Can Gore win on Bush tax cuts?
04/18/00: Levin's 'bridge' key to China trade?
04/11/00: Congress, U.S. Voters Still Aren't Ready For Campaign Reform
04/06/00: Bush, Gore Silent As Popular Culture Gets Ever Coarser
03/30/00: Is 2000 Like 1948, 1976 or 1960? Or Is This Unparalleled?
03/28/00: Will Bush, Gore Go for a Better Way To Pick Nominees?
03/23/00: Medicare cutbacks bleed hospitals
03/20/00: Chances Improve That China Trade Will Pass Congress
03/16/00: Lieberman as veep would help Gore
03/14/00: Can Bush, McCain Unite to Beat Gore?
03/09/00: Can GOP Forge Unity After Nasty McCain-Bush Race?
03/07/00: What accounts for McCain's excesses?
03/02/00: 'Debate' Proved Gore Is This Year's Best Gut-Fighter
02/29/00: Surprises! The 2000 GOP race is full of it
02/25/00: Voters want centrist in White House
02/23/00: Gore would hit McCain's record
02/15/00: Will negativity hurt McCain in S.C.?
02/10/00: How hard should Bush hit McCain?
02/08/00: Bush must retool his entire campaign
01/27/00: Could Gore beat Bush as Truman beat Dewey?
01/20/00: Big New Surplus Estimates Could Alter 2000 Politics
12/21/99: Bush improves, everyone panders
12/16/99: Prospects improve for campaign reform
12/14/99: Riots raise free trade as 2000 issue
12/10/99: Gore won GOP 'debate' in N.H.
12/07/99: Election pits Bush cuts vs. Medicare boost
12/03/99: Can race be a constructive issue in 2000?
11/19/99: White House race may be best in decades
11/16/99: Where is Bush on health care fight?
11/11/99: Will TV stop profiteering from politics?
11/09/99: Is GOP isolationist, or just partisan?
11/04/99: Gore, Bradley Run Opposite Races On Style, Substance
11/01/99: GOP, Clinton could reach deal swiftly
10/27/99: Bush to fight 'culture wars' -- positively
10/21/99: Porter, Mack: heroes on medical research
10/19/99: Gore scores among party big shots, but polls go South
10/14/99: Bush critiques could help GOP Congress
10/12/99: Congress can save health care from ruin
10/07/99: Will gun-control cause the GOP to shoot itself in the foot?
10/05/99: Gore moves: Desperate but necessary
10/01/99: Fox, Armstrong make case for NIH
09/28/99: Dems' race brightens Bush's chances
09/23/99: East Timor deflates `Clinton Doctrine'
09/21/99: Buchanan v. Bush? Yeah right
09/17/99: Candidates turn attention to poverty
09/15/99: Bush's education problem
09/09/99: Budget makes 2000 an `issues' election
09/07/99:Airport rage increases, with good reason
09/02/99: U.S. future up for grabs in 2000
08/31/99: U.S. Capitol needs visitor's center -- soon
08/24/99: Will 2000 be the year of the foreign crisis?
08/19/99: Neither party has upper hand for '99
08/17/99: Ford gets freedom medal one month early
08/12/99: There's time to catch Bush, say Gore aides
08/10/99: Rudy, Hillary try much-needed makeovers
08/09/99: GOP must launch new probe of Chinagate
08/02/99: Pols blow fiscal smoke on budget surplus
08/02/99: One campaign reform should pass: disclosure
07/27/99: Gore leads Bush in policy proposals

©1999, NEA