|
Jewish World Review / July 22, 1998
Linda Chavez
These 'choice' advocates are being demonzied ... by the Left
FIRST IT WAS REGGIE WHITE, then Trent Lott and now a coalition of conservative Christian
groups who have raised the hackles of gay-rights activists by suggesting that
homosexual behavior is sinful.
The most recent battle in the Culture Wars is currently playing out on the pages of
some of the largest circulation newspapers in the country, as groups including the
Christian Coalition and the Family Research Council are running national ads urging gay
men and women to abandon homosexual activity.
Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that sexual relations between two adults of the
same sex is always wrong, according to the General Social Survey of the National
Opinion Research Center, the most comprehensive poll of its kind on social issues.
Moreover, both traditional Christian and Jewish beliefes holds that all sex outside marriage is sinful.
Period. Sex before marriage is a sin. Adultery is a sin. Sex between two men or two
women is a sin. Not all individual Jews or Christians accept this teaching, but it is by far the
predominant view among Protestants and Catholics, as well as Muslims.
Why shouldn't a group of conservative Christians be able to state such run-of-the-mill,
orthodox religious beliefs in a newspaper ad?
What rankles the critics of the ads most, however, isn't whether homosexual behavior
is sinful but whether homosexuals can change their sexual behavior. The most
controversial of the ads have involved first-person testimony from former lesbians and
gay men who have changed their lifestyle.
"Thousands of ex-gays like these have walked away from their homosexual identities,"
proclaims one ad featuring a large group photo of smiling men and women. The ad is
an invitation to homosexuals and their families to contact a ministry that specializes in
helping gays to change their behavior.
The idea that homosexuals can -- or should -- change their sexual orientation is
abhorrent to gay-rights activists. Much of the support for laws granting homosexuals
protection against discrimination, for example, rests on the presumption that sexual
orientation is akin to race or gender and can't be changed. But clearly some people do
change their sexual behavior, if not their underlying desires.
Countless gay men and lesbians were once involved in heterosexual relationships --
many of them married and became fathers and mothers, then left those partners to
seek new, same-sex relationships. Is it impossible to imagine that this transformation
can work in the other direction, too? According to Exodus, a Christian group that
ministers to ex-gays, thousands of men and women have already done so.
No one, including the sponsors of the ads, is suggesting that homosexuals should be
forced to change their behavior. But what about those gay men and women who want
to change? Ads like the ones in question reach homosexuals who have no idea where
to turn for help if they want to change their lifestyle. The ads don't promise miracles,
but they do offer hope.
"Leaving homosexuality was the hardest thing I've ever had to do," says Anne Poulk, a
former lesbian, now a married mother featured in one of the ads. Poulk wants to help
others take the same, admittedly difficult path.
Nothing in the ads encourages hatred or mistreatment of homosexuals, but the ads do
express a view of traditional Christian morality and encourage homosexuals to seek
help in abiding by the prohibition against sex outside marriage.
Instead of recognizing that Christian groups have the same right to try to shape public
opinion and influence behavior as any other group, gay activists have been denouncing
the ads as "extremist." It's time gay groups started demonstrating a little tolerance of
their
The ads "fly in the face of scientific fact and are at odds with what we know from
biological and psychological science," claims Dean Hamer, the author of a
much-disputed study of the genetic basis of homosexuality. Other critics have called
the ads "hateful" and said their purpose is to stigmatize homosexuals and create the
impression that homosexuality is an illness. But despite the furor the ads have
provoked, the views expressed are fairly conventional.
Dawn Killion, former
lesbian activist says
abandoning 'gayness' is
the individual's choice
7/22/98: These 'choice' advocates are being demonzied ... by the Left.
7/15/98: Will 'neonaticide' become the new buzzword?
7/07/98: Urge to mega-merge, stopped in time
6/30/98: Why take responsibility if
somebody else will pay?
6/23/98: Blinded by the red, or is it the green?
6/17/98: Flotsam in the wake of romance
6/10/98: We have a ways to go in the bilingual war
6/3/98: Tyson's triumph over tragedy
5/28/98: Why Univision's Perenchio is out to hurt his fellow Hispanics
5/20/98: Sometimes Buba actually tells the truth ... as he sees it
5/12/98: Chill-out on the chihuahua and ... Seinfeld
5/8/98: The revolution is just about over
4/28/98: Let's face it: both parties are full of hypocrites
4/21/98: Legislating equality
4/14/98: One down, many to go
4/7/98: Mexican mayhem?
3/31/98: Of death and details
3/25/98: Americans are unaware of NATO expansion
3/18/98: Intellectual-ghettoes in the name of diversity
3/11/98: Be careful what you wish for ...
3/4/98: The Press' Learning-disability
2/25/98: 50 States Are Enough!
2/18/98: Casey at the Mat
2/11/98: The legal profession's Final Solution
2/4/98: Faith and the movies
1/28/98: Clinton, Lewinsky, and Politics Vs. Principle
1/21/98: Movement on the Abortion Front
1/14/98: Clones, Courts, and Contradictions
1/7/98: Child custody or child endangerment?
12/31/97: Jerry Seinfeld, All-American
12/24/97: Affirmative alternatives: New initiatives for equal opportunity are out there
12/17/97: Opening a window of opportunity (a way out of bilingual education for California's Hispanic kids)