JWR Eric BreindelMona CharenLinda Chavez
Jacob SullumJonathan S. TobinThomas Sowell
Robert ScheerDon FederRoger Simon
Left, Right & Center
Jewish World Review / February 25, 1998 / 29 Shevat, 5758

Linda Chavez

Linda Chavez 50 States are Enough!

REPUBLICAN LEADERS are about to do something so stupid and venal that maybe they don't deserve to retain control of Congress in this year's election. They want to make Puerto Rico the 51st state in the union, and next week, the House will vote on a measure to start the process. Why? Expect to hear plenty of platitudes about self-determination and full democracy for Puerto Rico's 3.7 million people. But what the Republicans are really interested in is the potential votes of some 25 million Hispanics on the U.S. mainland.

Only a fool or a desperate Republican could ever imagine that the average Mexican American in East Los Angeles or Cuban American in Miami gives a hoot about statehood for Puerto Rico. But the hope that Puerto Rican statehood would entice more Hispanics into voting Republican is what's driving this monumentally bad idea that could cost billions in increased federal aid and permanently alter the culture of the United States.

Puerto Rico became an American territory in 1898 after the United States won the Spanish American War. Everyone born on the island is a U.S. citizen by birth, and all males are subject to the draft. The island is currently considered a "commonwealth," with its own elected government and laws, subject to the U.S. Constitution and federal court jurisdiction.

On the other hand, Puerto Ricans living on the island do not pay federal taxes, cannot vote in presidential elections and elect only a non-voting member to the U.S. House of Representatives. All that would change under the bill to be voted on next week. The proposed legislation will allow Puerto Ricans to vote on whether they wish to become a state. If a bare majority voting in the plebiscite support statehood, Congress will be locked into a transition plan, making the island a state in 10 years.

So, what makes this such a bad idea? For starters, Puerto Rico is a linguistically and culturally autonomous island with a rich modern history that dates back nearly 100 years prior to Jamestown and Plymouth Rock. Puerto Ricans don't consider themselves Americans even though they are U.S. citizens -- only 16 percent defined themselves as Americans in one recent poll. Fewer than 20 percent of Puerto Ricans speak English, and the bill does nothing to ensure that Puerto Ricans -- especially schoolchildren -- learn English if Puerto Rico becomes a state.

In fact, there is nothing Congress can do to force Puerto Ricans to learn English, even if Congress makes the acceptance of English a condition of statehood. As the current congressional delegate from Puerto Rico, Rep. Carlos Romero-Barcelo, told me personally a few months ago, once Puerto Rico becomes a state, the legislature would simply revoke English as its official language and put in place Spanish or both Spanish and English.

The likely outcome for the rest of the nation would be increased pressure to make the United States bilingual -- or at least those states with large Spanish-speaking populations, such as California, Texas, Florida, New York and Illinois. Hispanic activists have been promoting this agenda for years and already have succeeded in mandating Spanish-language instruction for some 2 million Hispanic youngsters in public schools and bilingual ballots in federal elections.

As worrisome as the cultural implications for Puerto Rican statehood are, however, the dismal economy on the island should be cause for even greater alarm. In 1990, half of all Puerto Rican families earned less than $10,000 a year, 20 percent of Puerto Ricans were unemployed, and an additional 52 percent were out of the labor force altogether. Over half the island's population already receives some form of public assistance, and 59 percent would qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit once Puerto Rico becomes a state -- at an estimated cost to American taxpayers of $18 billion in additional federal outlays.

As Romero-Barcelo, an avid statehood supporter, succinctly put it in his 1978 book Statehood Is for the Poor: "Puerto Rico's per capita contribution to the federal treasury, were we a state, would come to less than that of any other state in the union. At the same time, the per capita benefits we'd reap from federal aid programs would be greater than those of any other state in the union." It is simply not in anyone's interest to grant statehood under these circumstances. When Puerto Ricans become economically self-sufficient and decide they want to learn English -- as my Spanish-speaking ancestors did in New Mexico before it became a state in 1912 -- Republicans and everyone else should welcome them with open arms.

But not until then.

Up

2/18/98: Casey at the Mat
2/11/98: The legal profession's Final Solution
2/4/98: Faith and the movies
1/28/98: Clinton, Lewinsky, and Politics Vs. Principle
1/21/98: Movement on the Abortion Front
1/14/98: Clones, Courts, and Contradictions
1/7/98: Child custody or child endangerment?
12/31/97: Jerry Seinfeld, All-American
12/24/97: Affirmative alternatives: New initiatives for equal opportunity are out there
12/17/97: Opening a window of opportunity (a way out of bilingual education for California's Hispanic kids)


©1998, Creators Syndicate, Inc.