Jewish World Review July 25, 2002 / 16 Menachem-Av, 5762
Hillary fights hard for soft money
First, Santa Claus, then, the bull market -- now, it turns out that some of those campaign-finance reformers you hear about aren't so reform-minded after all. According to Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., a "core group" of five or six Senate Democrats -- including New York's Hillary Rodham Clinton -- is trying to figure out how to get around the McCain-Feingold ban on "soft money" campaign contributions that takes effect Nov. 6.
So concluded Feingold after a "closed-door shouting match" last week with Clinton, D-N.Y., first reported by the New York Daily News, that turned a private, fairly dry Democratic forum on the impact of the landmark fundraising legislation into a public, fairly juicy spat. "You're not living in the real world!" Clinton is said to have "screamed" at Feingold before a lunchtime gathering of Democratic senators. "I picked up my glass of water and said I do live in the real world, and I'm doing just fine in it," Feingold later told the Associated Press.
Maybe it's best to reserve judgment on which senator holds the more compelling claim on reality: the gentlewoman from New York whose surname is synonymous with soft-money corruption, or the gentleman from Wisconsin who sees purification in legislated censorship. Feingold, however, was perceptive enough to describe the fracas as "a troubling display for a party that claims to be for trying to clean up the system."
A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle found this characterization of the Democratic Party "perplexing," but Clinton's staff members have reserved judgment. Maybe it was just too hard, almost, for them to imagine Clinton -- the very picture of senatorial collegiality, lo, these many months -- even becoming involved in an intra-party contretemps. Of course, anyone becoming familiar with the context of this little senatorial scrum would instantly understand what the News dubbed as Clinton's "first big blow-up with a colleague."
In the course of a presentation on the impact of the soft-money ban and the Federal Elections Commission regulations, which Feingold would like to see tightened, Democratic campaign lawyer Robert Bauer warned that senators could face criminal charges for seeking "general political support" from an audience that might subsequently make soft-money donations. "It was also suggested," the News reported, "that political events, like President Clinton's infamous White House coffees for big donors, could theoretically be criminalized under the new law." (They could have been criminalized under the old law, but that's another story.)
Did someone say "White House coffees"? Them's fightin' words for the junior senator from New York by way of Pennsylvania Avenue. When Feingold protested, oddly, that such an interpretation of his law was "not rational," Clinton simply "hammered him." ("Clobbered him" was another particularly evocative description of her approach, the vigor of which may have had something to do with the fact that Feingold was the one Democrat to vote against dismissing charges against Bill Clinton during the former president's senate impeachment trial.) Clinton went on to explain how it was that she knew from experience that, "political adversaries ... would make senators' lives hell," that allegations and suits might come to nothing, but only after considerable political and financial cost.
Ouch. Feingold said Clinton later apologized to him, although for what -- attacking his pet campaign-finance legislation, or voting for it in the first place -- he didn't specify. "It's not surprising, but I don't know how they think they're going to get away with it, in a closed room, trying to figure out every way they can to keep raising soft money, and then publicly act like they're getting rid of it," Feingold later said. "It's going to sound phony."
But look on the bright side: At least it's going to sound consistent.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Diana West is a columnist and editorial writer for the Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.
07/12/02: Goretheus unbound
07/10/02: Rosie takes a shine to Republicans
07/08/02: Are you still shocked, Sami?
07/02/02: Can Britney win hearts of the Middle East?
06/28/02: A war on terror or Islamists?
06/25/02: Blame the murderer, and the messenger
06/21/02: Up front and personal with Atta
06/18/02: Terrorism at the United Nations
06/11/02: Who's policing the INS?
06/07/02: Spa Gitmo
06/04/02: Can rock gods save the queen?
05/31/02: Hillary's war
05/29/02: Have you forgotten we're at war?
05/24/02: An antiquated luxury of the past
05/21/02: From terrorists to tourists
05/19/02: Hate U.
05/07/02: Western self-loathing numbs us to violence
05/03/02: Pioneering television
05/01/02: Western self-loathing numbs us to violence
04/29/02: It's the misconduct, stupid
04/24/02: Medal of diss-honor
04/17/02: Holy sanctuary or terrorist shield?
04/12/02: Egyptian clerics solicit martyrs for murder
04/09/02: Defining terrorism down
04/05/02: The Wilder life
04/02/02: Acting, equality and the Academy
03/31/02: Speeding to conclusions
03/25/02: Hard to remove blood (libel) stains
03/21/02: The tale of Nixon's tapes --- again
03/19/02: The Big Lie lives on
03/15/02: The tunnel vision of '9/11'
03/13/02: The American Auschwitz?
03/08/02: Hating the indoctrination of hate
03/05/02: Clinton and Enron: Old friends
03/01/02: Pickering doesn't polarize, the process does
02/26/02: Destiny's prefabricated child
02/22/02: The White House heist
02/20/02: Making the grade
02/11/02: Studying student visas
02/06/02: Understanding arrogance
02/04/02: The professor's war
01/29/02: Disconnected dialogue
01/18/02: How much is enough?
01/15/02: Oh brothers, where art thou?
01/10/02: Air on the side of caution
01/04/02: Blacks seeing red at Harvard
01/02/02: Clinton's campaign continues
12/26/01: A tale of two exhibitions
12/24/01: Taliban Idyll
12/19/01: Right is right
12/17/01: Hillary strikes out
12/13/01: Lost files, lost presidency
12/10/01: Revolutionaries never grow up
12/05/01: Immigration reform talk is not just for 'haters' anymore
12/03/01: A new symbol of justice
11/30/01: Beyond morality
11/26/01: Can't keep a good man down
11/20/01: Tough talk at the United Nations
11/19/01: Hollywood's other battle
11/14/01: What's the matter with Sara Jane?
11/09/01: A beef with bin Laden's Beef Noodles
11/07/01: Facing up to the FBI's past mistakes
11/02/01: A school that teaches patriots to shutup
10/30/01: The gap between Islam and peace
10/26/01: The ties that bind (and gag)
10/24/01: This war is more than Afghanistan
10/22/01: The fatuous fatwa
10/19/01: Left out
10/16/01: Whose definition of terrorism?
10/11/01: Post-stress disorder
10/08/01: How the West has won
10/01/01: Good, bad or ... diplomacy
09/28/01: Drawing a line in stone
09/21/01: Prejudice or prudence?
09/14/01: When our dead will finally rest in hallowed ground
09/07/01: We want our #$%^&*() audience back!
08/24/01: The transformation from Green Mountain State to Green Activist State is all but complete
08/17/01: Enlightenment at Yale
08/10/01: From oppressors to victims, a metamorphosis
08/03/01: Opening the dormitory door: College romance in the New Century
08/01/01: How-To Hackdom: The dubious art of writing books about writing books
07/20/01: Hemming about Hemmings
07/13/01: Justice has not been served in the Loiuma police brutality case
06/22/01: When PC parades are too 'mainstream'
06/22/01: When "viewpoint discrimination" in our schools was
not nearly so gnarly a notion
06/15/01: Lieberman flaunts mantle of perpetual aggrievement
06/07/01: Is graciousness the culprit?
06/01/01: The bright side of the Jeffords defection
05/29/01: Campus liberals should be more careful
05/18/01: 'Honest Bill' Clinton and other Ratheresian Logic
05/11/01: Dodging balls, Bugs, and 'brilliance'
05/04/01: Foot in mouth disease and little lost Tories
04/20/01:The last classic Clinton cover-up
04/20/01: D-Day, Schmee-Day
04/06/01: For heaven's sake, a little decency!
03/30/01: The sweet sound of slamming doors and clucking feminists
03/23/01: America's magazines and the 'ick-factor'
03/09/01: Felony neglect
03/02/01: Who's sorry now?
02/23/01: 'Ecumenical niceness' and other latter-day American gifts to the world
02/16/01: Elton and Eminem: Royal dirge-icist meets violent fantasist
02/12/01: If only ...
© 2001, Diana West