Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 20, 2001 / 29 Tamuz, 5761

Diana West

Diana West
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Hemming about Hemmings -- BY rights, the unanimous finding of a blue-ribbon panel of scholars should have renewed American curiosity over whether Thomas Jefferson and his slave Sally Hemings had a child together, if not recast the two-century-old debate altogether. Remember when this allegation was said to have been settled, as Pulitzer-Prize-winning historian and resume-craftsman-extraordinaire Joseph J. Ellis put it, "beyond a reasonable doubt"? That was back in 1998, after a retired pathologist named Eugene Foster analyzed DNA samples from the Jefferson and Hemings families to conclude, as the resulting Nature headline read, "Jefferson Fathered Slave's Last Child."

But did he? After weighing the evidence, both scientific and historical, a commission of 12 professors led by Robert F. Turner of the University of Virginia announced in April that, given the two dozen-plus Jefferson males (with DNA markers in common) roaming Virginia at the time in question, there simply can be no grounds for certainty. "The commission agrees unanimously that the allegation is by no means proven," the summary of the report reads, "and we find it regrettable that public confusion about the 1998 DNA testing and other evidence has misled many people." With the exception of one low-key dissent, the professors' conclusions "range from serious skepticism about the charge to a conviction that it is almost certainly false."

Alas, most people will have to go online to follow the fascinating detective work that went into this landmark study (the full report is available at It is a frustrating fact that while the original Jefferson-DNA story made a massive media splash--perhaps exceeded that year only by the re-election and impeachment of Bill Clinton--subsequent retrenchments and emendations to the initial story have made nary a media blip.

For instance, almost immediately after the Nature story broke, sparking one of those fabled follow-up frenzies, Dr. Foster and his co-authors admitted their evidence was inconclusive and even "misleading" for not having clarified the fact that then-65-year-old Thomas Jefferson was only one of a family-treeful of possible fathers for Sally's last child, Eston Hemings. As reported in Science magazine, two of the more plausible sources of Jeffersonian DNA, for example, Thomas's younger brother Randolph (12 years his junior) and Randoph's son Isham, were completely ignored by the Foster study because, as Dr. Foster told the magazine, "they weren't suspects."

This crucial phase of the Jefferson-Hemings story went grossly unreported.

But back to Joseph J. Ellis--Foster booster, Jefferson expert, and, not incidentally, Clinton-impeachment opponent. Mr. Ellis, it may be remembered, had something of a cottage industry in 1998 for his camera-ready comparisons of Thomas Jefferson and Bill Clinton (along with Sally Hemings and Monica Lewinsky), which surely greased the old Clinton spin machine before, during and after the election and subsequent impeachment proceedings. Typical of his impeachment-era analysis is the following: "The dominant effect of this news [the Foster study] will be to make Clinton's sins less aberrant and more palatable ... I think he's [Thomas Jefferson is] going to help Bill Clinton in his impeachment hearings." Mr. Ellis grew positively lyrical on the subject, writing, "The Foster study seems impeccably timed to arrive like a comet that has been winging through space for 200 years before landing squarely in the middle of the Clinton impeachment inquiry."

Sigh. Of course, as it is now well known, Mr. Ellis is prone to flights of fancy, most notoriously about himself. Following a report last month in the Boston Globe, Mr. Ellis admitted to fabricating an extensive Vietnam War record, roles in both the anti-war and civil rights movements, even a stellar student football career--all lies, which he wanted everyone, himself included, to believe in. No word, incidentally, in the media on Mr. Ellis's starring role in riding that Jefferson comet through space into the middle of the Clinton impeachment inquiry.

Not that it was all lies, but it was certainly something he wanted everyone to believe in.

JWR contributor Diana West is a columnist and editorial writer for the Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.


07/13/01: Justice has not been served in the Loiuma police brutality case
06/22/01: When PC parades are too 'mainstream'
06/22/01: When "viewpoint discrimination" in our schools was not nearly so gnarly a notion
06/15/01: Lieberman flaunts mantle of perpetual aggrievement
06/07/01: Is graciousness the culprit?
06/01/01: The bright side of the Jeffords defection
05/29/01: Campus liberals should be more careful
05/18/01: 'Honest Bill' Clinton and other Ratheresian Logic
05/11/01: Dodging balls, Bugs, and 'brilliance'
05/04/01: Foot in mouth disease and little lost Tories
04/20/01:The last classic Clinton cover-up
04/20/01: D-Day, Schmee-Day
04/06/01: For heaven's sake, a little decency!
03/30/01: The sweet sound of slamming doors and clucking feminists
03/23/01: America's magazines and the 'ick-factor'
03/09/01: Felony neglect
03/02/01: Who's sorry now?
02/23/01: 'Ecumenical niceness' and other latter-day American gifts to the world
02/16/01: Elton and Eminem: Royal dirge-icist meets violent fantasist
02/12/01: If only ...

© 2001, Diana West