Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Feb. 6, 2002 / 24 Shevat, 5762

Diana West

Diana West
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Understanding arrogance -- MAYBE we Westerners really are as arrogant as the nonarrogant rest of the world tells us. After all, who would dare ask Islamic militants holding an abducted Wall Street Journal reporter for the man's swift release "so that he may return home safe to his wife and soon-to-be-born child"? Only someone with an exaggerated sense of what President Bush (Arrogant Westerner No. 1) might call "the dignity of every life," a phrase from his State of the Union address. The nerve. Or "da noive," as they say in New Jersey, where the Department of Education just revised the state's history curriculum recommendations to exclude such Founding Arrogants as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin.

In all seriousness, I wish the Journal editor hadn't made so very personal an appeal to Daniel Pearl's captors. This most tender revelation about the American prisoner (a wife! an unborn child!) can only have thrilled his tormentors, impervious as they are to claims of mercy or justice -- or other precepts that were, once upon a time, naively thought of as coming under the heading of "common decency." It turns out that there is nothing common about them.

Certainly, there's nothing common about Western and non-Western understandings of such terms pertaining to human conduct. This is a huge problem, as our worlds -- one, generally if multiculturally Western, the other, purely and militantly Islamic -- collide in the war on terrorism. Why, even the term "terrorism" remains subject to debate.

Not, of course, in the West, where terrorism is known to be the slaughter of civilians for political gain by such groups, as President Bush specified this week, as the anti-Israel suicide squads Islamic Jihad, Hamas and Hezbollah. The Islamic world will define terrorism as the slaughter of unarmed civilians -- unless the unarmed civilians happen to be Israelis slaughtered by Islamic Jihad, Hamas and Hezbollah. Such carnage counts as "legitimate resistance." And terrorism? "Islam is against terrorism," Saudi Arabian Interior Minister Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz said recently. "Why is it not said that Israeli terrorism is the fiercest and most heinous terrorism being committed now?" To that end, interior ministers from 17 Arab countries gathered this week to call on the world to condemn "all kinds of terrorism, especially the state terrorism practiced by Israel," and to ask the United Nations to sponsor an international conference (Durban redux?) to make it official.

So much for a mutual understanding of terrorism, a cruel weapon of war against nations and peoples. How about something more basic -- the concept of cruelty itself? Take the pitiful case of Sufiyatu Huseini, a Nigerian woman sentenced to death by stoning once her 10-month-old baby is weaned. Her crime? Adultery. Under sharia, or Islamic law, adultery is a crime second only to one other offense -- and no, that one isn't murder (No. 3). The worst crime under Islamic law, which, as The New York Times Magazine explained, came to northern Nigeria because of "the loosening of federal control and the advent of democratic freedoms, is insulting Allah. (Stealing goats is also pretty bad, as several Nigerians who have had a hand amputated can attest.)

The arrogant Westerner in me finds this barbaric, which is just the kind of "value judgment" that was struck down long ago by the deans of cultural relativism. Richard Dowden, a less arrogant Westerner working for The New York Times, was able to couch things more sensitively. He asked Mansur Ibrahim Sa'id, a Nigerian law school dean who attended the local constitutional convention (or whatever you call a sharia-drafting confab), "whether stipulations in the United Nations charter against cruel, degrading and inhuman treatment conflict with amputations and stonings." Sitting beneath a copy of the U.N. charter taped to the wall, Sa'id replied, "You have to decide what amounts to cruelty and take into account the religious background. What yardstick are you using? You have to know if the people who use this law see it as cruel and inhuman."

That's the correct answer -- politically correct answer, anyway -- for a value-free, nonjudgmental world. Are we there yet? Not quite. We still have a yardstick of our own, despite those who try to slide it from our grasp with a slippery relativism that teaches that no culture is better than another. (See New Jersey's new Founder-free curriculum.) Bush referred to it when speaking of the "non-negotiable demands of human dignity -- the rule of law; limits of the power of the state; respect for women; private property; free speech; equal justice; and religious tolerance." The non-Western world hasn't evolved with these traditions -- the deep, dark secret of multiculturalism -- and it is incumbent upon us to teach and hang onto them, as they say, for dear life -- not to mention liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

JWR contributor Diana West is a columnist and editorial writer for the Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.


02/04/02: The professor's war
01/29/02: Disconnected dialogue
01/23/02: Anti-Indiscrimination
01/18/02: How much is enough?
01/15/02: Oh brothers, where art thou?
01/10/02: Air on the side of caution
01/04/02: Blacks seeing red at Harvard
01/02/02: Clinton's campaign continues
12/26/01: A tale of two exhibitions
12/24/01: Taliban Idyll
12/19/01: Right is right
12/17/01: Hillary strikes out
12/13/01: Lost files, lost presidency
12/10/01: Revolutionaries never grow up
12/05/01: Immigration reform talk is not just for 'haters' anymore
12/03/01: A new symbol of justice
11/30/01: Beyond morality
11/26/01: Can't keep a good man down
11/20/01: Tough talk at the United Nations
11/19/01: Hollywood's other battle
11/14/01: What's the matter with Sara Jane?
11/09/01: A beef with bin Laden's Beef Noodles
11/07/01: Facing up to the FBI's past mistakes
11/02/01: A school that teaches patriots to shutup
10/30/01: The gap between Islam and peace
10/26/01: The ties that bind (and gag)
10/24/01: This war is more than Afghanistan
10/22/01: The fatuous fatwa
10/19/01: Left out
10/16/01: Whose definition of terrorism?
10/11/01: Post-stress disorder
10/08/01: How the West has won
10/01/01: Good, bad or ... diplomacy
09/28/01: Drawing a line in stone
09/21/01: Prejudice or prudence?
09/14/01: When our dead will finally rest in hallowed ground
09/07/01: We want our #$%^&*() audience back!
08/24/01: The transformation from Green Mountain State to Green Activist State is all but complete
08/17/01: Enlightenment at Yale
08/10/01: From oppressors to victims, a metamorphosis
08/03/01: Opening the dormitory door: College romance in the New Century
08/01/01: How-To Hackdom: The dubious art of writing books about writing books
07/20/01: Hemming about Hemmings
07/13/01: Justice has not been served in the Loiuma police brutality case
06/22/01: When PC parades are too 'mainstream'
06/22/01: When "viewpoint discrimination" in our schools was not nearly so gnarly a notion
06/15/01: Lieberman flaunts mantle of perpetual aggrievement
06/07/01: Is graciousness the culprit?
06/01/01: The bright side of the Jeffords defection
05/29/01: Campus liberals should be more careful
05/18/01: 'Honest Bill' Clinton and other Ratheresian Logic
05/11/01: Dodging balls, Bugs, and 'brilliance'
05/04/01: Foot in mouth disease and little lost Tories
04/20/01:The last classic Clinton cover-up
04/20/01: D-Day, Schmee-Day
04/06/01: For heaven's sake, a little decency!
03/30/01: The sweet sound of slamming doors and clucking feminists
03/23/01: America's magazines and the 'ick-factor'
03/09/01: Felony neglect
03/02/01: Who's sorry now?
02/23/01: 'Ecumenical niceness' and other latter-day American gifts to the world
02/16/01: Elton and Eminem: Royal dirge-icist meets violent fantasist
02/12/01: If only ...

© 2001, Diana West