Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 7, 2001 / 21 Mar-Cheshvan, 5762

Diana West

Diana West
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Facing up to the FBI's past mistakes -- IT'S time for a pause, but not in the bombing. Great Britain's Tony Blair has just urged one and all never to forget "why we are doing this" -- namely, fighting Islamist terrorism. But is it possible to forget? The prime minister seems to believe that the shock of Sept. 11 is receding for some, settling into the past as a neatly repressible memory. That such callousness might exist is something to ponder as the grim pageant of memorial services continues, day after day, for victims who died in the attack.

Now might also be an appropriate time to pause and consider why we find ourselves in the historical position of having to be "doing this" in the first place -- particularly considering that some people, as recently retired CIA veteran Anne Allen told The Washington Times, "don't even have the grace to keep their mouths shut." Allen, a 37-year-veteran of the intelligence agency, was responding to what former Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright had to say this week about why the Clinton administration allowed Osama bin Laden and his network to terrorize and kill Americans during the past decade, and live on to terrorize and kill Americans in this one.

While Bill Clinton likes to talk up near misses on Osama bin Laden with the relish of a fisherman fooling about the "one that got away," Albright tells a different story. According to the former secretary of state, the poor Clinton administration never received the intelligence information needed to link bin Laden's group to attacks on the two U.S. embassies in Africa or the USS Cole. The administration, she adds, never had the public support required to take on Al Qaeda, either. In other words, her hands -- her boss' hands -- were completely tied. Given this handicap, it's a wonder that either of them ever managed to pass the buck at all.

What Albright doesn't mention, of course, is Clinton's disastrous move to bar intelligence contacts with anyone even teetering on the edge of eligibility for the Eagle Scouts. This decision effectively cut the flow of intelligence information off at its, frankly, often tainted source. And there's no word from the former secretary of state on the sundry measures short of military action the administration could and should have taken. These possibilities include, as the former CIA employee noted, securing our borders, matching intelligence information with visa applications, linking FBI lists with airline manifests, and stockpiling assorted vaccines against the bioterrorist threat.

Albright seems similarly untroubled by second thoughts about the unconscionable Clinton policy of treating terrorism against Americans, from the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, as criminal matters to be investigated by the FBI and dealt with by the courts -- not terrorist attacks requiring national action. And she shows little awareness of the opportunity her administration missed by not trying -- ever -- to muster public support for a campaign against terrorism. Guess everyone was too busy trying to muster public support to stay in office. "We cannot alter the past," Albright said, a tad on the defensive side. That, of course, doesn't mean that we shouldn't face up to it in an attempt to understand it.

But try understanding this: The Washington Post reports that the FBI hesitated "for years" to investigate radical Islamic clerics in this country "despite evidence that their mosques had been used to recruit and fund suspected terrorists." Using the hair-raising example of the thankfully incarcerated Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman -- "the blind cleric" whose enduring links to Al Qaeda and to those guilty of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings make him a central figure in the Islamist terror network -- the newspaper reveals that not only was Rahman's investigation stalled for five months after the first Trade Center bombing (three years after the bureau began receiving intelligence reports pointing to the man's terrorist past), the bureau never brought Rahman before a grand jury, bugged his offices, subpoenaed his mosque's records or wiretapped his phones.

What gives?

Turns out the FBI considered possible charges of "religious persecution" to pose a greater threat to the national interest than possible acts of terrorism. "A change in thinking may be taking place today," a senior FBI official rather feebly told the Post.

May be taking place? While preserving the memory of why we fight, it's important to consider why we have to fight. We can't, as Albright has said, alter the past. But we can deepen our understanding and learn from it. No doubt our future depends on doing exactly that.

JWR contributor Diana West is a columnist and editorial writer for the Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.


11/02/01: A school that teaches patriots to shutup
10/30/01: The gap between Islam and peace
10/26/01: The ties that bind (and gag)
10/24/01: This war is more than Afghanistan
10/22/01: The fatuous fatwa
10/19/01: Left out
10/16/01: Whose definition of terrorism?
10/11/01: Post-stress disorder
10/08/01: How the West has won
10/01/01: Good, bad or ... diplomacy
09/28/01: Drawing a line in stone
09/21/01: Prejudice or prudence?
09/14/01: When our dead will finally rest in hallowed ground
09/07/01: We want our #$%^&*() audience back!
08/24/01: The transformation from Green Mountain State to Green Activist State is all but complete
08/17/01: Enlightenment at Yale
08/10/01: From oppressors to victims, a metamorphosis
08/03/01: Opening the dormitory door: College romance in the New Century
08/01/01: How-To Hackdom: The dubious art of writing books about writing books
07/20/01: Hemming about Hemmings
07/13/01: Justice has not been served in the Loiuma police brutality case
06/22/01: When PC parades are too 'mainstream'
06/22/01: When "viewpoint discrimination" in our schools was not nearly so gnarly a notion
06/15/01: Lieberman flaunts mantle of perpetual aggrievement
06/07/01: Is graciousness the culprit?
06/01/01: The bright side of the Jeffords defection
05/29/01: Campus liberals should be more careful
05/18/01: 'Honest Bill' Clinton and other Ratheresian Logic
05/11/01: Dodging balls, Bugs, and 'brilliance'
05/04/01: Foot in mouth disease and little lost Tories
04/20/01:The last classic Clinton cover-up
04/20/01: D-Day, Schmee-Day
04/06/01: For heaven's sake, a little decency!
03/30/01: The sweet sound of slamming doors and clucking feminists
03/23/01: America's magazines and the 'ick-factor'
03/09/01: Felony neglect
03/02/01: Who's sorry now?
02/23/01: 'Ecumenical niceness' and other latter-day American gifts to the world
02/16/01: Elton and Eminem: Royal dirge-icist meets violent fantasist
02/12/01: If only ...

© 2001, Diana West