Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review March 21, 2002 / 8 Nisan, 5762

Diana West

Diana West
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The tale of Nixon's tapes --- again | Like the Ghost of Politics Past, Richard Nixon made some headlines this month as the National Archives released another 5 million hours -- sorry -- 500 hours of his tape-recorded conversations as president. "Nixon Defended Envoy's Groping," which is how the Washington Post saw fit to headline the story, just about says it all concerning the barrel-scraping significance of this batch of tape.

Or does it? The notorious White House tapes of the Nixon administration -- the continually taped coverage of a presidency in action -- stand alone as a weird sort of political precursor to Reality TV. One main difference, of course, is that Nixon secretly taped his presidential life without an inkling that one day anyone and everyone would be able to listen in. This gives the taped record an immediacy and a special kind of veracity that a speech or memoir, for example, never has. Still, while there is an emotional truth to these tapes -- the storied Nixonian paranoia-cum-Machiavellianism, for example, is on centerstage -- the "news" they contain indicates that off-the-cuff comments may sometimes be exactly that.

Despite the Washington Post's headline stress on "groping" -- a sign of lingering Clinton fatigue? -- the two main stories to emerge from the tapes concern two very bad things: anti-Semitism and nuclear recklessness. These tapes include nasty comments about "untrustworthy" Jews at the Justice Department, and Nixon's plan to reduce the percentage of Jewish political appointees in the second term to reflect the population -- which, it must be said, is inversely reminiscent of Bill Clinton's efforts to make his cabinet "look like America." There is also an interesting earful from former Federal Reserve Chairman Arthur Burns, who predicted that "Wall Street Jews" would be voting Republican in 1972. As the Washington Post recounted it, "Mr. Burns, who was Jewish, said he was comfortable about that. 'In all the years that I have known you,' he told Nixon, 'I have never heard of what even remotely resembles what could be interpreted as a touch of anti-Semitism or anti-Catholicism.'"

Mr. Burns, of course, never heard these tapes. On the other hand, he and Henry Kissinger, two rather prominent Jewish Nixon appointees, did manage to hold their jobs into the second Nixon term -- and beyond. Are Nixon's sentiments, as the Los Angeles Times' leftist columnist Robert Scheer recently wrote, really "echoed in the surviving cells of Al Qaeda"? Are they borne out by Nixon's record on Jewish affairs, including his staunch pro-Israel stance?

This faltering connection between internal conversation and historical record applies to an exchange with Henry Kissinger in which Nixon raises the notion of using a nuclear bomb in Vietnam. Kissinger bats it down. "I just want you to think big," Nixon replies. End of story? Some 30 years later, hysteria has ensued. The Associated Press reported "the taped comment brought revulsion from many in Asia," with the Vietnamese Foreign Ministry denouncing the "formidable cruelty" of the Nixon administration; a Japanese professor noting that an A-bomb would have jeopardized U.S. use of Okinawa; and a retired Thai general concluded, "This proves that Americans care nothing about other human lives." A New Zealand minister said he felt "quite sick" about Nixon's comments, adding that they show "the decision-makers were not only callous, but racist as well."

They do? Vietnam historian Stanley Karnow -- no Nixon booster -- told the AP he doubts Nixon gave serious thought to using atomic weapons. "Just because he said it doesn't mean it was really an option." Historian Stanley Kutler added that "the tapes are replete with Nixon blurting out outlandish remarks." Maybe these tapes tell us a lot about the private man, but we still have to look elsewhere for the public meaning.

JWR contributor Diana West is a columnist and editorial writer for the Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.


03/19/02: The Big Lie lives on
03/15/02: The tunnel vision of '9/11'
03/13/02: The American Auschwitz?
03/08/02: Hating the indoctrination of hate
03/05/02: Clinton and Enron: Old friends
03/01/02: Pickering doesn't polarize, the process does
02/26/02: Destiny's prefabricated child
02/22/02: The White House heist
02/20/02: Making the grade
02/11/02: Studying student visas
02/06/02: Understanding arrogance
02/04/02: The professor's war
01/29/02: Disconnected dialogue
01/23/02: Anti-Indiscrimination
01/18/02: How much is enough?
01/15/02: Oh brothers, where art thou?
01/10/02: Air on the side of caution
01/04/02: Blacks seeing red at Harvard
01/02/02: Clinton's campaign continues
12/26/01: A tale of two exhibitions
12/24/01: Taliban Idyll
12/19/01: Right is right
12/17/01: Hillary strikes out
12/13/01: Lost files, lost presidency
12/10/01: Revolutionaries never grow up
12/05/01: Immigration reform talk is not just for 'haters' anymore
12/03/01: A new symbol of justice
11/30/01: Beyond morality
11/26/01: Can't keep a good man down
11/20/01: Tough talk at the United Nations
11/19/01: Hollywood's other battle
11/14/01: What's the matter with Sara Jane?
11/09/01: A beef with bin Laden's Beef Noodles
11/07/01: Facing up to the FBI's past mistakes
11/02/01: A school that teaches patriots to shutup
10/30/01: The gap between Islam and peace
10/26/01: The ties that bind (and gag)
10/24/01: This war is more than Afghanistan
10/22/01: The fatuous fatwa
10/19/01: Left out
10/16/01: Whose definition of terrorism?
10/11/01: Post-stress disorder
10/08/01: How the West has won
10/01/01: Good, bad or ... diplomacy
09/28/01: Drawing a line in stone
09/21/01: Prejudice or prudence?
09/14/01: When our dead will finally rest in hallowed ground
09/07/01: We want our #$%^&*() audience back!
08/24/01: The transformation from Green Mountain State to Green Activist State is all but complete
08/17/01: Enlightenment at Yale
08/10/01: From oppressors to victims, a metamorphosis
08/03/01: Opening the dormitory door: College romance in the New Century
08/01/01: How-To Hackdom: The dubious art of writing books about writing books
07/20/01: Hemming about Hemmings
07/13/01: Justice has not been served in the Loiuma police brutality case
06/22/01: When PC parades are too 'mainstream'
06/22/01: When "viewpoint discrimination" in our schools was not nearly so gnarly a notion
06/15/01: Lieberman flaunts mantle of perpetual aggrievement
06/07/01: Is graciousness the culprit?
06/01/01: The bright side of the Jeffords defection
05/29/01: Campus liberals should be more careful
05/18/01: 'Honest Bill' Clinton and other Ratheresian Logic
05/11/01: Dodging balls, Bugs, and 'brilliance'
05/04/01: Foot in mouth disease and little lost Tories
04/20/01:The last classic Clinton cover-up
04/20/01: D-Day, Schmee-Day
04/06/01: For heaven's sake, a little decency!
03/30/01: The sweet sound of slamming doors and clucking feminists
03/23/01: America's magazines and the 'ick-factor'
03/09/01: Felony neglect
03/02/01: Who's sorry now?
02/23/01: 'Ecumenical niceness' and other latter-day American gifts to the world
02/16/01: Elton and Eminem: Royal dirge-icist meets violent fantasist
02/12/01: If only ...

© 2001, Diana West