Monday

May 18th, 2026

Insight

Dems finally come clean 'bout their radical design

 Dan McCarthy

By Dan McCarthy

Published May 12, 2026

Dems finally come clean 'bout their radical design

SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT'S FREE. (AND NO SPAM!) Just click here.

Virginia Democrats are doing an unwitting service to the whole country — by revealing just how hostile their party is to the most essential checks and balances.

Democrats violated the state's constitution by pushing through a referendum to take four congressional seats away from Republicans.

But when Virginia's supreme court threw out the illegal map, Democrats didn't back down:

They started thinking of ways to get rid of every justice on the court, so they could pack it with new ones expressly picked to return a verdict more favorable to the party.

If the Democrat-controlled Virginia legislature could impose a mandatory retirement age of 54 on the justices — who are all older than that — they could be removed and replaced by compliant partisans.

This wasn't just a harebrained scheme by state Democrats; this was discussed on a call with the highest-ranking Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.

As breathtaking as this power grab might be, it's consistent with the thrust of the national party's thinking about doing away with troublesome constitutional checks.

Democrats have been arguing for decades to weaken or eliminate protections built into the Constitution to prevent a self-interested faction or party — even one with a short-term electoral majority behind it — from seizing total power.

Virginia today is exactly what James Madison and other framers of the Constitution were afraid of:

A faction — the Democrats — is using its success in the most recent election to try to rewrite the rules for future elections and is prepared to intimidate or destroy any institution that stands in its way, including the state's supreme court.

Virginia is not a solid-blue state — just a year ago, it had a full slate of Republican statewide elected officers.

Its congressional delegation is split, six Democrats to five Republicans.

It may presently be out of reach for Republicans in presidential elections, but its legislative races and contests for statewide offices are competitive — Republicans had a majority in the House of Delegates as recently as three years ago.

Indeed, Virginia is so politically balanced that Democrats try to put a moderate face on their party by picking the likes of Abigail Spanberger, Mark Warner and Tim Kaine for governor or U.S. senator, candidates who present themselves as centrists.

Yet once Spanberger was sworn in as governor this year, with Democratic majorities in the general assembly, the push was on to throw the state constitution aside and redraw the congressional map to give Democrats 10 seats to one for the GOP, and now the justices who stopped that gerrymander face the party's wrath.

Virginia's constitution doesn't seem to allow removal of sitting justices by imposing a mandatory retirement age.

But it's the thought that counts — and this one is of a piece with the way Democrats nationwide think about not only the U.S. Supreme Court but also the Electoral College, the filibuster and the U.S. Senate itself.

Democrats are even in the habit nowadays of claiming elections for Congress are unfair if the results of the national "popular vote" in House races don't match who wins the most seats — as if lopsided Democratic majorities in California should have any bearing on who voters in Tennessee or Virginia pick to represent them.

Democratic Party activists and ideologues have long argued the Constitution's fundamental design is unfair because it doesn't give short-term majorities absolute power and protects small states from being overrun by the votes of large states.

Yet their arguments are as inconsistent as they need to be for the party's benefit:

Many of the same liberals who complain the Senate is inherently undemocratic also want to admit Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico as small states with two senators apiece.

Arguments aimed at delegitimizing the Senate — and Senate institutions like the filibuster — and the Electoral College and even House elections when the results aren't to Jeffries' satisfaction are just variable means to a consistent end: the Democratic Party's power.

Yes, Republicans gerrymander, too:

Redrawing legislative districts for partisan advantage has been a feature of American politics since almost the beginning — Elbridge Gerry, the namesake of the practice, signed the Declaration of Independence.

But Virginia's Democrats didn't just gerrymander; they violated a constitution to do it, and are contemplating going even further to manufacture a supreme court that treats the party's will as law.

If this were just one state's story, it would be bad enough.

It's not, though — talk of packing the U.S. Supreme Court to force it in a progressive direction, demands that presidential and congressional elections reflect national majorities of the moment, and other radical ideas bandied about by Democrats from one coast to the other are a threat to the rule of law everywhere.

It's a threat that won't go away until it's finally carried out — or until Democrats are rebuked hard enough at the ballot box that they're forced to moderate.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Previously:
05/05/26: The Silenced Generation
04/28/26:Colleges Are Making Political Violence Worse
04/21/26:Immigration Amnesty by Any Other Name
04/14/26: A New Extreme in Gerrymandering
04/07/26: A New Extreme in Gerrymandering
03/17/26: Why Are Senate Dems Making Air Travel Worse?
03/10/26: Cuba Should Accept Trump's 'Friendly Takeover'
03/03/26: Immigration Enforcement Saves Lives
02/24/26: How a Party Offends Its Voters
02/17/26: Why Are Anti-ICE Activists Building Borders?
02/10/26: A Japanese Lesson for Troubled Britain
02/03/26: The Trump Coalition Wins But the GOP Brand Doesn't
01/27/26: Canada Should Warm to Trump's Arctic Plans
01/20/26: From Rock to Tech, Talent Flees Taxes
01/13/26: Woman Who Weaponized Car Against I.C.E Endangered Her Life -- and Yours
01/06/26: Tim Walz Personifies Dems' Decline
12/30/25: Harvard Says Yes to Discrimination, No to Western Civ
12/23/25: JD Vance Gets America's Creed and Heritage Right
12/16/25: Trump's Inflation Trap
12/09/25: Biden's Immigration Debacle Is the Media's, Too
12/02/25: 'Iryna's Law' and the Bad Judges Who Make It Necessary
11/26/25: Marjorie Taylor Greene's Exit Is a Warning to Republicans
11/19/25: Trump Hasn't Lost Hispanics (Yet)
11/11/25: Trump's Tariffs on Trial
10/28/25: MAGA Makes Allies Great Again
10/21/25: How To Make the AmericaS Great Again
10/16/25: Columbus Day Celebrates Our Civilization
10/09/25: Why Sharpies Are Made in America Again
09/30/25: Assata Shakur and Other Parents of Political Violence
09/09/25: Who's Accountable for Autopen Pardons?
09/02/25: Gender dysphoria is a mental-illness, NOT an all-encompassing delusion
08/26/25: Trump's Industrial Policy Is Realism, Not Socialism
08/19/25: Is Gavin Newsom the Dems' Answer to Trump?
08/12/25: Just Say No to More Marijuana
08/05/25: Will the GOP Make Libs Generous Again?
07/30/25: Trump's Trade Lesson for Economists (and the World)
07/22/25: Whose Politics Canceled Stephen Colbert?
07/08/25: A Big Beautiful Test of GOP Principles and Discipline
07/01/25: Dems Need Populism, But Not Zohran's Sort
06/25/25: Secure Borders Win Wars Like This One
06/18/25: WEIRD Protesters Should Stay Home
06/17/25: WEIRD Protesters Should Stay Home
06/04/25: State that's long eluded GOP turns toward Trump
05/21/24: Trump's Sun Belt Hopes and Rust Belt Needs
05/14/24: What Trump Sees in Doug Burgum
05/07/24: The Vietnam Era Never Ended for Biden's Party
05/06/24: Nationalists of the World, Unite?
04/25/24: Foreign Policy Splits
04/16/24: How pro-lifers stand to lose everything gained in overturning Roe
04/02/24: PBS Misremembers William F. Buckley Jr.
04/02/24: Who Wants to Be House Speaker?
03/26/24: Trump Hunts for a VP Close to Home
03/19/24: Princess Kate and Democracy's Discontents
03/12/24: Can Biden Buy the Voters?
03/05/24: Veepstakes Give Trump an Edge
02/20/24: Do Americans Trust Either Party?
02/13/24: Vladimir Putin -- A Passive Aggressor
01/23/24: Will 'Lawfare' Take Trump Off the Ballot?
01/16/24: Will Africa Save America?
01/09/24:'The Sopranos' at 25: A new world tragedy
01/02/24: Trump, Biden and a Fight for the Heart
12/12/23: What Happened to Ron DeSantis?
12/12/23: Biden Looks Doomed -- But Is He?
12/05/23: A Test for Trump and His Rivals
11/21/23: When Inequality Is Fatal for Men
11/14/23: Nevermind, The Battle's Over
11/07/23: War in the Dem Party -- and at the Opera
10/24/23: Israel's Lesson for 2024: A Lib Crackup
10/17/23: Libs' Dilemma: Immigration or Israel?
10/10/23: Why Bidenflation Defines Bidenomics
10/03/23: Will Gavin Newsom Copy Trump?
09/26/23: Biden's a Loser -- but Dems Can't Ditch Him
09/19/23: Do Sex Scandals Matter?
09/12/23: Cornel West Spells Doom for Biden
09/05/23: What Trump Does for Democracy
08/2/23: Ramaswamy: A Trump Versus Trump?
08/22/23: Take 'Rich Men North of Richmond' Seriously
08/16/23: How America Kills Its Own
08/08/23: The Biden Pardon That Can Spare America
08/01/23: Harding, a consevative for the ages
07/25/23: Demography Destiny, for Us and China
07/18/23: The Frontrunner Who Looks Like a Loser Is Biden
07/11/23: Britain's Bad Example for American Conservatives
07/05/23: Could We Still Win a Revolutionary War?
06/27/23: Civilizations Clash -- in Ukraine and at Home
06/20/23: China Comes for the Caribbean
06/13/23: Fertility, Family and Bio-Socialism
06/06/23: From American Dream to Orwell's Nightmare
05/23/23: Ukraine war is an existential struggle --- for the West
05/23/23: Learn the Right Midterm Lessons -- or Lose in 2024
05/16/23: Feinstein Today Is Biden Tomorrow
05/09/23: Trump, DeSantis and Political Courtship
05/02/23: RFK Jr.'s Threat to Biden
04/25/23: Biden's Lost Generation
04/25/23: Who's In Charge of Clarence Thomas?
04/11/23: Beyond AI, Our Cyborg Future
04/04/23: 2024: 3 Leaders, 1 Way to Win
03/28/23: Climate Science Makes a Bad Religion
03/21/23: All the Conspiracy That's Fit to Print

Columnists

Toons