Tuesday

April 7th, 2026

Insight

A New Extreme in Gerrymandering

 Dan McCarthy

By Dan McCarthy

Published April 7, 2026

A New Extreme in Gerrymandering

SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT'S FREE. (AND NO SPAM!) Just click here.

This year's midterm elections aren't just about who wins in November; they're about who wins fights over gerrymandering taking place right now.

Nowhere is the battle fiercer than in Virginia, a state where voters just six years ago approved a constitutional amendment to take partisanship out of congressional redistricting.

Now Democrats want to make an exception to the rule Virginia voters approved by a nearly two-thirds majority in 2020:

They want this year's congressional map to be drawn up by their own state legislators, erasing the districts set up by the bipartisan board established by the amendment just a few years back.

It's no surprise when a state like Texas or California that leans overwhelmingly toward one party indulges in partisan gerrymandering.

But Virginia is a purple state, and its congressional representation — six Democrats, five Republicans — currently reflects that.

Yet, if Democrats get their way on April 21, they'll be able to seize 10 of Virginia's 11 congressional seats for themselves, in the most brazenly unjust reapportionment seen anywhere in decades.

This isn't about making a blue state bluer or a red state redder; this one's an effort to manufacture a virtual monopoly for one party, depriving millions of the other party's voters of their representation.

One thing the sheer audacity of this move suggests is that Democrats nationwide aren't quite as confident as they pretend to be about winning the midterms fair and square.

If they expect voters coast to coast to repudiate Trump's GOP in a landslide, why resort to such extreme measures in a place like Virginia?

Either Democrats are more worried than they let on, or they want to do more than just win — they want to annihilate their competition.

They're proving far more ruthless than Republicans, who balked at the opportunity last year to redraw Indiana's congressional map from a 7-2 partisan split to a 9-seat GOP sweep.

What Democrats are attempting in Virginia is tantamount to legalized election theft, if voters are unwise enough to approve the amendment they're pushing.

There's a political cost for this attack on small-d democracy: Gov. Abigail Spanberger, for one, is paying a price in her polling.

She was elected by a whopping 15-point margin last year and was soon touted as the Democrats' new face of moderation, which is why she was the party's choice to respond to President Donald Trump's State of the Union address this year.

Yet her approval ratings are already poor, with a Washington Post survey at the end of March finding 47% of those polled gave her a passing grade, while 46% disapproved of her performance in office so far.

The numbers are similar to polling on the amendment to give Virginia's Democrat-controlled legislature the power to draw the congressional districts for the midterms: 50% say they approve, 47% disapprove.

The amendment can pass with a simple majority, but if the polls are right, Democrats have no margin to spare, and early voting reports so far indicate there's particularly strong turnout in Republican areas of the state.

The early vote is outpacing early voting in last year's gubernatorial election, too.

Arguably, the amendment shouldn't be on the ballot at all: it's faced several legal challenges, with the state Supreme Court ultimately deciding the April 21 election can proceed even while doubts about its legality remain to be settled later.

The very wording of the amendment is illegal, Republicans contend, since state law specifies the text accompanying the measure "shall be limited to a neutral explanation," while the amendment itself is tendentiously worded as an attempt to "restore fairness."

Who wouldn't vote to restore fairness?

The campaign for the amendment has been a master class in deceit and manipulation, with even news outlets in the deep-blue D.C. suburbs of Northern Virginia noting the copious use of "pink slime" techniques by the "Yes" side.

Those techniques involve propaganda disguised to look impartial — like a made-to-purpose publication branded as The Virginia Independent, which the Arlington-based news site ARLNow.com describes as "a partisan newspaper advancing Democrats' arguments."

That slime has been flooding into voters' mailboxes, including mine.

Maybe my blue suburb hasn't been a target of whatever efforts the Republicans are making — though the other possibility is that the GOP just isn't trying as hard.

Texas kicked off the latest wave of redistricting ahead of the midterms, as Republicans there looked to widen their advantage over the Democrats.

Yet as the divergent examples of Indiana and Virginia show, it's the Democrats who are more hellbent on winning, even if they have to turn state constitutions into confetti to do it.

Politics is a test of wills-and if Republicans fail this one, they'll almost certainly fail in November, too.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Previously:
03/17/26: Why Are Senate Dems Making Air Travel Worse?
03/10/26: Cuba Should Accept Trump's 'Friendly Takeover'
03/03/26: Immigration Enforcement Saves Lives
02/24/26: How a Party Offends Its Voters
02/17/26: Why Are Anti-ICE Activists Building Borders?
02/10/26: A Japanese Lesson for Troubled Britain
02/03/26: The Trump Coalition Wins But the GOP Brand Doesn't
01/27/26: Canada Should Warm to Trump's Arctic Plans
01/20/26: From Rock to Tech, Talent Flees Taxes
01/13/26: Woman Who Weaponized Car Against I.C.E Endangered Her Life -- and Yours
01/06/26: Tim Walz Personifies Dems' Decline
12/30/25: Harvard Says Yes to Discrimination, No to Western Civ
12/23/25: JD Vance Gets America's Creed and Heritage Right
12/16/25: Trump's Inflation Trap
12/09/25: Biden's Immigration Debacle Is the Media's, Too
12/02/25: 'Iryna's Law' and the Bad Judges Who Make It Necessary
11/26/25: Marjorie Taylor Greene's Exit Is a Warning to Republicans
11/19/25: Trump Hasn't Lost Hispanics (Yet)
11/11/25: Trump's Tariffs on Trial
10/28/25: MAGA Makes Allies Great Again
10/21/25: How To Make the AmericaS Great Again
10/16/25: Columbus Day Celebrates Our Civilization
10/09/25: Why Sharpies Are Made in America Again
09/30/25: Assata Shakur and Other Parents of Political Violence
09/09/25: Who's Accountable for Autopen Pardons?
09/02/25: Gender dysphoria is a mental-illness, NOT an all-encompassing delusion
08/26/25: Trump's Industrial Policy Is Realism, Not Socialism
08/19/25: Is Gavin Newsom the Dems' Answer to Trump?
08/12/25: Just Say No to More Marijuana
08/05/25: Will the GOP Make Libs Generous Again?
07/30/25: Trump's Trade Lesson for Economists (and the World)
07/22/25: Whose Politics Canceled Stephen Colbert?
07/08/25: A Big Beautiful Test of GOP Principles and Discipline
07/01/25: Dems Need Populism, But Not Zohran's Sort
06/25/25: Secure Borders Win Wars Like This One
06/18/25: WEIRD Protesters Should Stay Home
06/17/25: WEIRD Protesters Should Stay Home
06/04/25: State that's long eluded GOP turns toward Trump
05/21/24: Trump's Sun Belt Hopes and Rust Belt Needs
05/14/24: What Trump Sees in Doug Burgum
05/07/24: The Vietnam Era Never Ended for Biden's Party
05/06/24: Nationalists of the World, Unite?
04/25/24: Foreign Policy Splits
04/16/24: How pro-lifers stand to lose everything gained in overturning Roe
04/02/24: PBS Misremembers William F. Buckley Jr.
04/02/24: Who Wants to Be House Speaker?
03/26/24: Trump Hunts for a VP Close to Home
03/19/24: Princess Kate and Democracy's Discontents
03/12/24: Can Biden Buy the Voters?
03/05/24: Veepstakes Give Trump an Edge
02/20/24: Do Americans Trust Either Party?
02/13/24: Vladimir Putin -- A Passive Aggressor
01/23/24: Will 'Lawfare' Take Trump Off the Ballot?
01/16/24: Will Africa Save America?
01/09/24:'The Sopranos' at 25: A new world tragedy
01/02/24: Trump, Biden and a Fight for the Heart
12/12/23: What Happened to Ron DeSantis?
12/12/23: Biden Looks Doomed -- But Is He?
12/05/23: A Test for Trump and His Rivals
11/21/23: When Inequality Is Fatal for Men
11/14/23: Nevermind, The Battle's Over
11/07/23: War in the Dem Party -- and at the Opera
10/24/23: Israel's Lesson for 2024: A Lib Crackup
10/17/23: Libs' Dilemma: Immigration or Israel?
10/10/23: Why Bidenflation Defines Bidenomics
10/03/23: Will Gavin Newsom Copy Trump?
09/26/23: Biden's a Loser -- but Dems Can't Ditch Him
09/19/23: Do Sex Scandals Matter?
09/12/23: Cornel West Spells Doom for Biden
09/05/23: What Trump Does for Democracy
08/2/23: Ramaswamy: A Trump Versus Trump?
08/22/23: Take 'Rich Men North of Richmond' Seriously
08/16/23: How America Kills Its Own
08/08/23: The Biden Pardon That Can Spare America
08/01/23: Harding, a consevative for the ages
07/25/23: Demography Destiny, for Us and China
07/18/23: The Frontrunner Who Looks Like a Loser Is Biden
07/11/23: Britain's Bad Example for American Conservatives
07/05/23: Could We Still Win a Revolutionary War?
06/27/23: Civilizations Clash -- in Ukraine and at Home
06/20/23: China Comes for the Caribbean
06/13/23: Fertility, Family and Bio-Socialism
06/06/23: From American Dream to Orwell's Nightmare
05/23/23: Ukraine war is an existential struggle --- for the West
05/23/23: Learn the Right Midterm Lessons -- or Lose in 2024
05/16/23: Feinstein Today Is Biden Tomorrow
05/09/23: Trump, DeSantis and Political Courtship
05/02/23: RFK Jr.'s Threat to Biden
04/25/23: Biden's Lost Generation
04/25/23: Who's In Charge of Clarence Thomas?
04/11/23: Beyond AI, Our Cyborg Future
04/04/23: 2024: 3 Leaders, 1 Way to Win
03/28/23: Climate Science Makes a Bad Religion
03/21/23: All the Conspiracy That's Fit to Print

Columnists

Toons