Assata Shakur and Other Parents of Political Violence

As the Trump administration takes on the latest wave of left-wing violence, an obituary reminds us what happens when political killers get away with their crimes.

The law never caught up with Joanne Chesimard, aka Assata Shakur.

She died last Thursday, age 78, an honored guest of Cuba's Communist regime — and honored, disgracefully, by tenured radicals in America's universities, too.

Professors have placed the convicted murderer on lists of "African-American heroes" and present her as a model for activism.

Stanford University's dean of students, Mona Hicks, quoted a "loving refrain from Assata Shakur" in a campus email at the time of the George Floyd riots:

"It is our duty to fight for our freedom. It is our duty to win. We must love and support each other. We have nothing to lose but our chains.'"

That language wasn't metaphorical — when Shakur said fight, it was a call to violence.

She wasn't just an activist. She was a terrorist, a self-styled "revolutionary" of the Black Liberation Army, a Marxist-Leninist radical group in the 1970s.

Revolution for them meant robbing banks, planting bombs and killing cops.

Shakur was already on the run from the law when she and two other BLA members were pulled over by New Jersey state troopers in 1973.

She and her associates shot at the officers — killing one and wounding another, while Shakur took a few bullets herself and one of her fellow radicals died.

Police took her into custody, but she became a cause celebre with progressives — who tried to call her a political prisoner — and in 1979 a BLA offshoot called "The Family" sprang her from prison.

Fidel Castro's dictatorship granted her asylum, then refused decades of U.S. entreaties to extradite her so she could face justice.

All that's in the past, though, and now so is Shakur.

Unfortunately, the evil example of Shakur is still very much with us.

It's not only gray-haired professors and college bureaucrats lauding her violent politics.

A teacher's union in Chicago affiliated with the American Federation of Teachers signaled its approval with a post on the social media site X that noted her death and dubbed her "a revolutionary fighter, a fierce writer, a revered elder of Black liberation, and a leader of freedom whose spirit continues to live in our struggle."

This was a woman who, without remorse, defended armed robberies her group committed as class-war "expropriation" and called cop-killing "armed struggle" in interviews she gave from her Cuban exile.

Shakur was hardly the only radical of the 1960s and '70s who became a hero to the academic left, trading bombs and bullets for poisoning the minds of future generations.

Angela Davis, a black extremist and longtime Communist Party stalwart who bought the shotgun used in the murder of a judge, is today "Distinguished Professor Emerita in the History of Consciousness and Feminist Studies" at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

Bill Ayers, the founder of the Weather Underground domestic terrorist group, eventually retired as "Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar" at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

In the 1990s, Professor Ayers worked with a promising young "community organizer" who'd go on to bigger things, a fellow by the name of Barack Obama.

The left-wing extremists of the 1960s and '70s didn't pay a very high reputational price — nor, in many cases, a legal price — for their violent politics.

Instead they were welcomed into the institutions that shape the outlook of rising generations.

America is now reaping the harvest of those seeds, with a new crop of student radicals who cheer for violence, and all too often commit it.

This time the country, including government and the universities themselves, will have to react differently: There must be no tolerance for such political violence.

Those who perpetrate it, including by beating up or harassing speakers on campus, must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

And those who applaud thuggery or more extreme violence must face professional consequences — they shouldn't be teaching anyone's children, for one thing.

Yes, the First Amendment enshrines their right to tell the world they idolize Assata Shakur's bloody legacy.

But Americans also have the right to choose their associations, their employees, and where their tax dollars go.

They should make the choice not to promote or subsidize the likes of Shakur, Davis or Ayers — and not to entrust their children to anyone who worships them.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Previously:
• 09/09/25: Who's Accountable for Autopen Pardons?
• 09/02/25: Gender dysphoria is a mental-illness, NOT an all-encompassing delusion
• 08/26/25: Trump's Industrial Policy Is Realism, Not Socialism
• 08/19/25: Is Gavin Newsom the Dems' Answer to Trump?
• 08/12/25: Just Say No to More Marijuana
• 08/05/25: Will the GOP Make Libs Generous Again?
• 07/30/25: Trump's Trade Lesson for Economists (and the World)
• 07/22/25: Whose Politics Canceled Stephen Colbert?
• 07/08/25: A Big Beautiful Test of GOP Principles and Discipline
• 07/01/25: Dems Need Populism, But Not Zohran's Sort
• 06/25/25: Secure Borders Win Wars Like This One
• 06/18/25: WEIRD Protesters Should Stay Home
• 06/17/25: WEIRD Protesters Should Stay Home
• 06/04/25: State that's long eluded GOP turns toward Trump
• 05/21/24: Trump's Sun Belt Hopes and Rust Belt Needs
• 05/14/24: What Trump Sees in Doug Burgum
• 05/07/24: The Vietnam Era Never Ended for Biden's Party
• 05/06/24: Nationalists of the World, Unite?
• 04/25/24: Foreign Policy Splits
• 04/16/24: How pro-lifers stand to lose everything gained in overturning Roe
• 04/02/24: PBS Misremembers William F. Buckley Jr.
• 04/02/24: Who Wants to Be House Speaker?
• 03/26/24: Trump Hunts for a VP Close to Home
• 03/19/24: Princess Kate and Democracy's Discontents
• 03/12/24: Can Biden Buy the Voters?
• 03/05/24: Veepstakes Give Trump an Edge
• 02/20/24: Do Americans Trust Either Party?
• 02/13/24: Vladimir Putin -- A Passive Aggressor
• 01/23/24: Will 'Lawfare' Take Trump Off the Ballot?
• 01/16/24: Will Africa Save America?
• 01/09/24:'The Sopranos' at 25: A new world tragedy
• 01/02/24: Trump, Biden and a Fight for the Heart
• 12/12/23: What Happened to Ron DeSantis?
• 12/12/23: Biden Looks Doomed -- But Is He?
• 12/05/23: A Test for Trump and His Rivals
• 11/21/23: When Inequality Is Fatal for Men
• 11/14/23: Nevermind, The Battle's Over
• 11/07/23: War in the Dem Party -- and at the Opera
• 10/24/23: Israel's Lesson for 2024: A Lib Crackup
• 10/17/23: Libs' Dilemma: Immigration or Israel?
• 10/10/23: Why Bidenflation Defines Bidenomics
• 10/03/23: Will Gavin Newsom Copy Trump?
• 09/26/23: Biden's a Loser -- but Dems Can't Ditch Him
• 09/19/23: Do Sex Scandals Matter?
• 09/12/23: Cornel West Spells Doom for Biden
• 09/05/23: What Trump Does for Democracy
• 08/2/23: Ramaswamy: A Trump Versus Trump?
• 08/22/23: Take 'Rich Men North of Richmond' Seriously
• 08/16/23: How America Kills Its Own
• 08/08/23: The Biden Pardon That Can Spare America
• 08/01/23: Harding, a consevative for the ages
• 07/25/23: Demography Destiny, for Us and China
• 07/18/23: The Frontrunner Who Looks Like a Loser Is Biden
• 07/11/23: Britain's Bad Example for American Conservatives
• 07/05/23: Could We Still Win a Revolutionary War?
• 06/27/23: Civilizations Clash -- in Ukraine and at Home
• 06/20/23: China Comes for the Caribbean
• 06/13/23: Fertility, Family and Bio-Socialism
• 06/06/23: From American Dream to Orwell's Nightmare
• 05/23/23: Ukraine war is an existential struggle --- for the West
• 05/23/23: Learn the Right Midterm Lessons -- or Lose in 2024
• 05/16/23: Feinstein Today Is Biden Tomorrow
• 05/09/23: Trump, DeSantis and Political Courtship
• 05/02/23: RFK Jr.'s Threat to Biden
• 04/25/23: Biden's Lost Generation
• 04/25/23: Who's In Charge of Clarence Thomas?
• 04/11/23: Beyond AI, Our Cyborg Future
• 04/04/23: 2024: 3 Leaders, 1 Way to Win
• 03/28/23: Climate Science Makes a Bad Religion
• 03/21/23: All the Conspiracy That's Fit to Print