Jewish World Review Dec. 20, 2002 / 15 Teves, 5763
The death penalty by the numbers
This week the Justice Department released "Capital Punishment 2001," its latest annual survey of death penalty
statistics. A prowl through the data prompts a few reflections on the capital punishment debate.
1. It is striking that a controversy so large revolves around numbers so small. The death penalty is available in 38
states and the federal system, yet only 66 convicted killers were executed in the United States last year. That was fewer
than the 85 executed in 2000, which in turn was fewer than the 98 executed in 1999.
Just as fewer murderers were put to death, fewer were sentenced to death. Only 155 people entered Death Row in
2001 -- the third consecutive decline and the lowest number in 22 years. All told, the population of prisoners under
sentence of death at the end of 2001 was 3,581, a slight decrease from the year before.
What these statistics mean isn't clear. Opponents of capital punishment were quick to claim that jurors, alert to the
supposed risk of executing innocents, have grown more reluctant to impose the death penalty. (Actually, the risk of a
wrongful execution is vanishingly small.) Others suggest that just as the overall number of murders decreased during the
1990s, when most recent Death Row arrivals would have committed their crimes, so too the number of capital
murders (those eligible for the death penalty) decreased. Which argument is more plausible? Without knowing how
many prosecutors actually sought the death penalty in 2001, there is no way to tell.
2. But whatever else might be said about these numbers, they are eclipsed by a far larger and more heartbreaking
number, one not mentioned in the Justice Department's report: the number of murder victims. In 2001, 15,980
Americans lost their lives to murder -- a death toll hundreds of times greater than the small body count of executed
Year after year, the number of inmates put to death by the state -- usually painlessly and after years of due process --
adds up to a minuscule fraction of the number of Americans purposely shot, beaten, strangled, knifed, poisoned, burned,
drowned, hanged, and tortured to death by murderers. And yet which set of deaths elicits more public outrage, more
media attention, more demands for reform, more cries to protect the innocent? Which occasions more debates, more
candlelight vigils, more international protest?
If those who pour so much passion, effort, and money into wiping out the death penalty would pour themselves instead
into wiping out homicide, who knows how many thousands of innocent lives they might save? But for reasons I have
never been able to fathom, they would rather save the lives of the guilty.
3. Capital punishment is routinely denounced as racially unjust -- more likely to be meted out to blacks than to whites.
"Capital Punishment 2001" proves the charge false.
"During 2001," the authors write, "63 men and 3 women were executed: 48 whites, 17 blacks, and 1 American
Indian." Of the 155 convicted murderers sentenced to death that year, "89 were white, 61 were black, 4 were Asian,
and 1 was self-identified Hispanic." The Death Row population as of Dec. 31, 2001, was 55 percent white, 43 percent
black, and 2 percent Indian, Asian, or something else. Of the 749 people executed in the United States between 1977
and 2001, 56 percent were white, 35 percent black, 7 percent Hispanic, and 1.6 percent of another race. Inasmuch as
black murderers commit about half of all homicides in the United States, the numbers make it clear that the death penalty
is imposed with disproportionate severity not on blacks, but on whites.
Whites even get executed faster than blacks. The average elapsed time from sentence to execution for white
inmates put to death in 2001 was 11 years, 2 months. For blacks, it was 13 years, 10 months -- 2-1/2 years longer.
The anti-black "racism" of the US death penalty system is like the Abominable Snowman: ugly, alarming, widely believed
in, and nonexistent.
4. Executions are unnecessary, death-penalty foes often argue -- all we have to do is lock killers up and throw away
the key. Anyone inclined to believe them ought to take a look at Page 10 of the new federal report, where inmates are
classified by their legal status at the time they committed capital murder.
At least 98 killers now on Death Row were already in prison when they murdered their victims; at least 37 others were
prison escapees. Locking up murderers guarantees nothing. Some will always escape and murder again. Some will kill
behind bars. In Pennsylvania last week, two vicious thugs serving long sentences for gruesome murders were convicted
of attempting to butcher a fellow inmate. Using a smuggled razor, they slashed his throat from ear to ear, severing his
trachea. Miraculously, he survived. Other victims don't.
The only way to permanently incapacitate a murderer is to kill him. Common sense says as much. The numbers say it
Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
12/16/02: Yes, Virginia, there is (still) a liberal media bias
12/03/02: On the brink of regime change --- in Iran
11/27/02: Light's victory over darkness
11/25/02: A 'Republican' lesson from a Democratic convention
11/22/02: The slippery senator
11/18/02: The campus 'diversity' fraud
11/14/02: MURDER AT A KIBBUTZ
11/01/02: Saddam's shop of horrors
10/24/02: Musings, random and otherwise
10/17/02: Jimma's ignoble prize
10/14/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate
10/11/02: Today it is libs who are most likely to demand the silencing of speech they disapprove of
10/04/02: Learning English from Day 1
09/30/02: The world will follow us to war
09/27/02: The face of antisemitism
09/20/02: Starving time in Zimbabwe
09/14/02: Against moral confusion / 9-12-2002
09/03/02: With 'eternal friends' like these
08/30/02: Enriching survivors was a costly mistake
08/26/02: John Kerry's absent passion
08/23/02: Bonnie, get your gun
08/19/02: A screenwriter's remorse
07/29/02: The real abortion extremists
07/26/02: Another round of Kemp-Roth
07/19/02: Jews among Arabs, Arabs among Jews
07/15/02: Musings, random and otherwise
07/12/02: The new civil rights champions
07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore
© 2002, Boston Globe