Jewish World Review August 31, 2001 / 12 Elul, 5761

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Shrugging at genocide -- AT the opening of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in April 1993, President Clinton alluded to the countless Jews who could have been saved if only the civilized world had acted once it realized what the Nazis were doing.

"For those of us here today representing the nations of the West," he said, "we must live forever with this knowledge: Even as our fragmentary awareness of crimes grew into indisputable facts, far too little was done."

He had sounded a similar theme at a reception the night before. Americans built the Holocaust Museum, he suggested, "to help ensure that the Holocaust will remain a sharp thorn in every national memory, but especially the memory of the United States. . . . We do so to redeem in some small measure the deaths of millions whom our nations did not, or would not, or could not save."

Clinton's commendable words would be put to the test less than 12 months later, when the militant Hutu government of Rwanda would embark upon an immense slaughter of that country's Tutsi minority. The Rwandan genocide would kill more people in less time than any event since the dropping of the atom bomb -- at least 800,000 victims in about 100 days. It would prove, in the words of journalist Samantha Power, "the fastest, most efficient killing spree of the 20th century." And the United States government, under the leadership of President Clinton, would do nothing to stop it.

Power, a seasoned war correspondent now based at Harvard's Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, spent three years investigating the failure of the US government to take the genocide in Rwanda seriously. Her findings, which draw on scores of interviews and hundreds of newly declassified documents, are set out in the September issue of The Atlantic Monthly. (Web address: ) Anyone who takes seriously the great post-Auschwitz imperative -- "Never Again" -- will find them heartbreaking and infuriating.

"The US government," Power writes, "knew enough about the genocide early on to save lives, but passed up countless opportunities to intervene." The American response was so minimal that Clinton's Rwanda "apology" -- "we . . . did not do as much as we could have and should have done to try to limit what occurred," he said during a trip to Africa in 1998 -- was actually a wild exaggeration.

"This implied that the United States had done a good deal but not quite enough," Power says. "In reality the United States . . . led a successful effort to remove most of the UN peacekeepers who were were already in Rwanda. It aggressively worked to block the subsequent authorization of UN reinforcements. It refused to use its technology to jam radio broadcasts that were a crucial instrument in the coordination and perpetuation of the genocide. And even as, on average, 8,000 Rwandans were being butchered each day, US officials shunned the term 'genocide' for fear of being obliged to act. The United States in fact did virtually nothing 'to try to limit what occurred.'"

American policymakers never for a moment contemplated sending US troops to stop the massacre. Eighteen US servicemen had been killed in Somalia six months earlier, and neither Congress nor the administration had the stomach for another humanitarian mission. Washington's only priority in Rwanda was to evacuate the few hundred Americans living there. Once that was accomplished, US policymakers lost all interest.

The extermination of the Tutsi never warranted a single high-level meeting at the White House or State Department. The administration issued exactly one statement naming Rwandan officials and demanding that they halt the violence. When a mid-level US diplomat took it upon herself to call Rwanda's military chief and warn him that Clinton would hold him accountable for the killings, he was amused. "Oh, how nice it is that your president is thinking of me."

Later would come the excuse that US officials never really knew how extensive or well-organized the killing was. But media coverage from the start made it clear that the bloodshed was massive and genocidal. Four days after the April 6 plane crash that killed the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi and triggered the violence, The New York Times was reporting "tens of thousands" of deaths -- "bodies littering the streets and, outside the main hospital, a pile of corpses six feet high."

On April 18, the Los Angeles Times correspondent described how "Rwandan soldiers raped and hacked to death civilians while battles with rebels raged for an 11th day." Soon the papers were estimating the number of dead at 100,000. On April 22, the Washington Post quoted the International Committee of the Red Cross, which called the massacres a "human tragedy on a scale we have rarely witnessed.'' Two days later, the Post reported on the neat piles of severed heads and limbs that could be seen in Rwanda's capital, "a bone-chilling order in the midst of chaos that harked back to the Holocaust."

As Power observes, Clinton could have known that genocide was happening -- if he had wanted to know.

It would have taken so little to stop, or at least impede, the killers. The United States was unwilling to do even that little. Power's article illuminates the ways in which a superpower genuinely committed to human dignity and freedom chose to look the other way as 800,000 Africans were slaughtered. But then, hadn't Primo Levi already told us? "It happened," Levi wrote 41 years after his liberation from Auschwitz, "therefore it can happen again: This is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere."

Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2001, Boston Globe