Jewish World Review July 12, 2002 /3 Menachem-Av, 5762

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The new civil rights champions

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | It is a picture of joy and jubilation. Rosa-Linda Demore-Brown, an enormous smile lighting up her face, holds out her arms to embrace Roberta Kitchen, who is rushing toward her in a blur of elation and relief.

The picture of the two black women, who are members of Cleveland Parents for School Choice, was taken by Associated Press photographer Ron Schwane on the day the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision upholding the constitutionality of the Ohio school voucher program. It appeared the following day in newspapers around the country, including The Washington Post, which ran it across three columns on Page 1. As well it should have, for Demore-Brown and Kitchen exemplify the struggle for black civil rights at the start of the 21st century.

Republicans and conservatives were latecomers to the civil rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s, and they have paid the political price for their tardiness. To this day, the great majority of blacks vote Democratic and black electoral clout is invariably leveraged to advance liberal political goals. But the civil-rights battleground has changed from the era when Jim Crow and racist sheriffs were the enemy. Today there is no struggle in which more is at stake for black America than the struggle for school choice. And this time it is not Republicans and conservatives who are on the wrong side of the fight.

No one is more victimized by the failures of America's government-run school system than the children of the urban poor, and those children are usually black. Stuck disproportionately in schools that don't work, blocked from the escape hatch of private or parochial school, black children routinely perform far below average in every subject. Sixty-three percent of black 4th-graders, for example, cannot read. The average black high school senior is about as well educated as the average white middle school student. There are many ways to ruin someone's life, but few are as effective as ignorance. And ignorance, by and large, is what public schooling guarantees for children from America's poorest and blackest neighborhoods.

Most American parents take school choice for granted. They either choose to live in neighborhoods with decent public schools or they choose to shoulder the financial sacrifice of paying for private school. Among those who know the government schools best -- the men and women who teach in them -- large numbers choose something better for their own kids. In Chicago and Philadelphia, 36 percent of public school teachers enroll their children in private schools. In Cleveland, 38 percent do. In Boston, 45 percent.

The idea behind vouchers is uncomplicated: to extend the power of choice to parents who would otherwise have none and thereby dignify their children with the equality to which they are entitled as Americans. If anyone should be avid for vouchers, it is liberals and Democrats, who trumpet their concern for the poor and who claim to care deeply about civil rights. And yet it is liberals and Democrats who most vehemently inveigh against vouchers. The reason, of course, is that teachers unions want to crush school choice -- like all monopolies, they detest competition -- and what the politically powerful teachers unions want, the left generally tries to give them.

There are a few honorable exceptions. The Rev. Floyd Flake, a prominent New York pastor and former Democratic member of Congress, is a passionate supporter of school choice. Andrew Young, the former Atlanta mayor, is another voucher supporter. So is Joseph Califano, who was Jimmy Carter's secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.

For a while, the most prominent honorable exception was former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, who created a great stir when he came out in favor of vouchers in 2000. At the time, he promoted them as a "sane approach to giving poor kids a better education." No longer. Today Reich is running for governor of Massachusetts, and he has recanted his support for vouchers. For him as for most Democratic politicians, it is more important to genuflect to the teachers unions than to rescue black children from lousy public schools.

Rosa-Linda Demore-Brown, Roberta Kitchen, and countless parents like them are as desperate as black parents in Topeka and Little Rock were a half-century ago. Back then it was segregationist governors who stood in schoolhouse doorways and vowed to keep black kids trapped in wretched schools. Today it is liberals and Democrats who stop at nothing to preserve educational inequality.

By contrast, it is conservatives and Republicans who have become the new civil rights champions, taking on all comers in the battle for school choice. What the NAACP and the ACLU were in the 1950s, the Institute for Justice and the Landmark Legal Foundation are today -- the defenders of the weak and the discriminated-against, who find racial injustice unbearable and are resolved to make it right.

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2002, Boston Globe