Jewish World Review July 3, 2002 /23 Tamuz, 5762
Riding the rails
Q: I sure hope Amtrak will get the money it needs to keep operating, don't you? I can't believe there are people who would be willing to let the nation's rail system grind to a halt.
A And I can't believe that David Gunn, Amtrak's president, had the gall to threaten a shutdown in the first place.
Q: What do you mean? How are the trains supposed to run if Amtrak goes broke?
A Let me understand you. Amtrak is in danger of going broke, so you think it should shut down the few routes on which it actually makes money?
Q: Huh? No, I -
A Look: Gunn wants to stampede Congress into forking over a couple hundred million dollars, and he's not going to get it by dwelling on unprofitable routes like the Sunset Limited.
Q: The what?
A The Orlando-Los Angeles run. It loses nearly $300 for every passenger it carries. That dog should have been put out of its misery years ago, and everybody knows it. So instead Gunn decides to raise a panic by threatening trains like the Metroliner, which carries more passengers between New York and Washington than the two airline shuttles combined. He got his panic, all right. But who in their right mind would pull the plug on routes that turn a profit?
Q: OK, so Gunn is playing hardball in order to get more money. Can you blame him? After all, Amtrak has always been treated like an unwanted stepchild. Other forms of transportation - buses, cars, airlines - get huge public subsidies. If Amtrak were treated fairly, its bottom line would be a lot stronger.
A I've got news for you: For all the moaning and groaning about how Amtrak gets the short end of the stick, the truth is that in the subsidy sweepstakes, it cleans up big time.
Q: No way! Amtrak only got $500 million in federal funds last year. Highways got $33.5 billion and air travel got $12.6 billion. Amtrak doesn't ''clean up'' - it gets shafted!
A Sure, if you just look at raw dollars, roads and planes receive more money than Amtrak does. But they could hardly do otherwise - they account for almost 99 percent of intercity transportation. You know what Amtrak's share of the intercity market is? One-half of 1 percent! It's not the dollars that count, it's the dollars per passenger mile. According to a Congressional Budget Office analysis, Amtrak is subsidized to the tune of 23 cents per passenger-mile, while airlines get two-10ths of a penny and highways get one-10th of a penny. Talk about a great train robbery!
Q: But don't you think that a national passenger rail system is a vital national priority - especially after Sept. 11?
A No, I don't. Outside of the heavily traveled Northeast Corridor, passenger trains are largely irrelevant in this country. America is a huge place with vast distances between cities, and for the vast majority of trips, trains simply don't cut it.
Q: So Congress should just let Amtrak twist in the wind?
A No. It should put Amtrak out of business.
Q: What?! But how about all the passengers who need it? How about all those people in New York and Washington and Boston? What are they supposed to do, fly Delta? Drive?
A I didn't say Congress should put passenger trains out of business. I said it should put Amtrak out of business.
Q: What's the difference?
A The difference is that Amtrak is a wasteful, mismanaged, government monopoly that has never turned a profit and is currently losing more than $1 billion a year. We would never let federal bureaucrats run the nation's airlines or intercity bus lines. It was folly to put the government in charge of running the railroads.
Q: So what should we do?
A First off, Congress should order Amtrak to shut down its weakest routes, the underused long-distance runs that lose so much money.
Q: And then?
A Then we should do what so many other countries have done: Let the private sector step in and take over the routes that make economic sense, either by purchasing them outright or running them as franchises. There are plenty of qualified railroad operators, you know. Joseph Vranich, an expert on train systems and a past president of the High-Speed Rail Association, listed a slew of them in The Wall Street Journal the other day. Besides, it wouldn't be the first time we've privatized train service.
Q: What do you mean?
A Remember Conrail, the government-owned freight railroad? In 1987, the feds sold it to private investors for $1.9 billion. That led to such an improvement in management that by the time it was sold to CSX and Norfolk Southern in 1998, its value had soared to $10.3 billion.
Q: Privatization. Hmm. You really think it could work?
A Sure. It works in Australia, Canada, Argentina, and Japan. It works for cars, buses, and airplanes. What doesn't work is Amtrak. It's time we derailed it, and let a better rail system get on track.
Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore
© 2002, Boston Globe