Jewish World Review April 23, 2001 / 30 Nissan, 5761
Causation can work ...
THE CREATOR, a wit warns, is going to come down and pull civilization over for speeding. The stock market has done that to America's economy.
Time was, the economy drove the stock market. Now causation can work the other way, at least when the market controls confidence. However, although surveys show plunging consumer confidence, consumer behavior is producing a negative savings rate -- spending outstripping after-tax income. Consumer spending is two-thirds of GDP, and in this year's first quarter, such spending probably was 3 percent higher than in last year's first quarter.
Today's economic events constitute a $4 trillion puzzle, that being the amount of wealth (exceeding the combined GDPs of Britain, France and Italy) that has quickly come and gone among Nasdaq stocks. So quickly; all of the $4 trillion was here only on March 10, 2000, Nasdaq's apogee. That may explain why Americans do not miss it more than they do: They hardly had time to become attach- ed to it.
The Wall Street Journal's Holman Jenkins recalls John Maynard Keynes's warning that low trading costs (Keynes never imagined online trading) in a context of abundant liquid capital make it too easy for investors to buy or sell on whim, rumor or perceived portents (Keynes never imagined CNBC). Yet investors remain remarkably free from the volatility that was predicted because of the new demographics of stock ownership. A majority of households own stocks, and mutual funds have surpassed banks as the major repository of savings. Investors' money is still flowing into equities.
Furthermore, the budget surplus may help divert more money from cautious investors to stocks. Such investors often have favored 30-year Treasury bonds, a species endangered by the government's reduced borrowing.
Investor stoicism, as Gretchen Morgenson of the New York Times calls it, has been remarkable, considering that if the shares of Yahoo, Cisco, Oracle, Sun Microsystems, Intel, AT&T and Microsoft were now to begin rising in price 15 percent a year, it would take them 20, 10, nine, nine, seven, seven and six years respectively to regain their recent peaks.
Could it be that the birth, and the bursting, of the tech stock bubble came about because Netscape founder Jim Clark craved a new boat? Journalist Michael Lewis, in his book "The New New Thing," says the decision to take Netscape public in August 1995 came when the company was 18 months old and had not earned a cent. But Clark, eager to finance a grandiose yacht, launched one of history's most successful share offerings.
Thus died the axiom that tech companies went public only after at least four consecutive profitable quarters. Soon we were in the brief, giddy life of capitalism without profits, during which some investors decided that only pre-modern investors thought the value of shares should be a function of the firm's future cash flows. Such investors became fixated on what are known in New Economy jargon as "nonfinancial metrics." Those are supposed ways of measuring value in a company when monetary measurements do not show value.
One such measurement is Web site traffic. Another is "engaged shoppers," measured by (no kidding) page views per viewer per month. Then there is a company's ability to claim shares of consumers' minds. Morgan Stanley has reported that one company (Homestore.com) had a "leading mind share among consumers." This, translates the Times' Morgenson, means that some "72 percent of the total time spent by Internet users on real estate-related Web sites in September was spent on Homestore's properties." However, what often is missing from these recondite measurements is how, if at all, they translate into revenues, not to mention (and often this is not mentioned) profits.
The Wall Street Journal first used the phrase "Internet bubble" in 1995. In 1996 Alan Greenspan put the phrase "irrational exuberance" into our economic lexicon. But what exuberance is rational nowadays?
Earlier this month there was a striking one-day rally when Nasdaq surged 8.9 percent, the Dow 4.2 percent. This happened for two reasons. Dell Computer announced that it would hit its quarterly revenue target -- but that target had been lowered in anticipation of the first quarter-by-quarter decline in the company's sales in seven years. And an uptick in the number of people applying for unemployment benefits suggested that the economy was slowing and thus the Federal Reserve might again cut interest rates, which it did last Wednesday.
The market's eager response to such meager good news does not indicate a recession mentality. Can there be a recession without one? Probably
Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.
04/19/01: Exposing the 'myth' of racial profiling
04/16/01: The costs of moral exhibitionism
04/13/01: Liberalism: The thrill of being startled by the unanticipated?
04/10/01: Enduring Arthur Miller: Oh, the Humanities!
04/06/01: Reading China
03/30/01: The Senate's Comic Opera
03/26/01: A second decade of economic trouble?
03/22/01: McCainism, the McCarthyism of today's "progressives"
03/19/01: Skirting what the First Amendment says
03/16/01: The SAT's thankless task
03/12/01: Fending Off the Speech Police
03/08/01: Democrat turnabout?
03/05/01: Let us hope not!
03/01/01: Duck! Our racial and ethnic spoils system is spinning out of control
02/26/01: Common Sense and the Constitution
02/22/01: Brooklyn's Artsy Dodgers
02/20/01: Whose surplus is it, anyway?
02/16/01: A truly inclusive holiday
02/12/01: Within the realm of Bush's tax cut
02/08/01: A season spoiled
02/05/01: Keeping faith behind initiatives
02/01/01: Tall order for a few federal dollars
01/29/01: You ain't seen nothin' yet
01/26/01: 'Art' Unburdened by Excellence
01/22/01: The monkey that could mean the end
01/19/01: The real enemy in the drug war
01/15/01: Congress just isn't big enough
01/12/01: Clinton's mark
01/08/01: All that is jazz
01/04/01: Bush's picks reveal Right attitude
01/02/01: Prosperity in perspective
12/28/00: Soft landing in a spoiled nation
12/26/00: When laws replace common sense
12/21/00: Beware the 'Bipartisanship'
12/18/00: ... A Brief Moment
12/13/00: Judicial activism on trial
12/11/00: Truth optional
12/06/00: A Chastened Court
12/01/00: Counting on some slippery language
11/28/00: Florida's rogue court
11/27/00: This willful court
11/22/00: Ferocity gap
11/17/00: Slow-motion larceny
11/13/00: Gore, Hungry for Power
11/09/00: No, the System Worked
11/06/00: The case for Bush
11/03/00: The Framers' Electoral wisdom
10/30/00: Political astronomy
10/27/00: Candidates condescending
10/23/00: No Partners For Peace
10/20/00: Talking peace with thugs
10/11/00: A feast of retreats
10/10/00: .. And what's gotten into the Danes?
10/05/00: The Agony of Debate
10/02/00: Senate Canvas
09/28/00: Milosevic: Not Another Saddam
09/25/00: Blaming the Voters
09/22/00: Saying No to the Euro
09/18/00: Farewell, Mr. Moynihan
09/14/00: When 'Choice' Rules
09/12/00: Colombia Illusions
09/08/00: Will He Spend It All?
09/04/00: Back in the U.S.S.R.
08/31/00: Stonewalling School Reform
08/28/00: Uphill for a California Republican
08/24/00: Sauerkraut Ice Cream
08/21/00: The Partial-Birth Censors
08/18/00: A Party to Prosperity
08/14/00: The National Scold on the Stump
08/10/00: The Thinking Person's Choice
08/07/00: The GOP of Powell And Rice
08/03/00: Panic in the Gore Camp
07/27/00: . . . Both Radical and Reassuring
07/06/00: Harry Potter: A Wizard's Return
07/03/00: Recalling the Revolution
06/29/00: An Act of Judicial Infamy
06/26/00: Life, Liberty and ... the Pursuit of Foxes
06/21/00: Fumble on Prayer
06/19/00: The unified field theory of culture
06/15/00: Schools Beset by Lawyers And Shrinks
06/12/00: Missile Defense Charade
06/07/00: The Grandparent Dissent
06/05/00: Liberal Condescension
06/01/00: Great Awakenings
05/30/00: Suddenly Social Security
05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money
© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group