Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 22, 2000 / 24 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761

George Will

George Will
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Ferocity gap -- REMARKABLE, is it not, how frequently the Clinton-Gore era makes one marvel, "This never happened before." Now we have the infinitely expanding "presidential election." That phrase used to refer, quaintly, to something that occurs on a Tuesday in November. This is written on a Tuesday, the 15th day of the election.

The Florida agony, although yet another novelty, illustrates a familiar asymmetry of American politics: Imagine the media meltdown of indignation if Republicans had circulated to their workers a memo on how to suppress, through challenges, voting in minority precincts, as the Democrats' memo did concerning how to suppress voting by the overseas military.

But the stunning asymmetry evident in Florida is the ferocity gap. Democrats fight for power with a frenzy born of . . . what? Partly of material greed.

The Democratic Party is, increasingly, government's incarnation as an interest group. Profound issues have convulsed American politics--slavery, secession, immigration, prohibition, desegregation. Today's relatively miniature arguments--for example, the modalities of providing a prescription drug entitlement--make the parties' conflicts seem trivial. But the differences are titanic to Democrats dependent on government.

Gore's vote this year reversed Clinton's broadening of the party's appeal. George W. Bush won a majority of white Catholics and white women, and made gains with Hispanics, young voters and moderate-income voters. Gore, more than Clinton in 1992 or 1996, depended on the party's base, particularly African Americans and unions. A higher proportion of African Americans than of other groups work for government; the growth of unions is primarily among public-sector employees (43 percent of all union membership, and increasing). Furthermore, floods of contributions come to Democrats from trial lawyers, who desperately need cooperative judges--and no tort reform.

But even more important than material interests in explaining the ferocity gap in Florida is Gore's justly famous remark last year to an aide: "I'm not like George Bush. If he wins or loses, life goes on. I'll do anything to win." Defeat for Bush would be a disappointment. Defeat for Gore would be annihilation--life would not go on. Hence his Florida frenzy, which has produced this surreal situation:

In a Democratic-dominated recounting process in Democratic strongholds, people squint at punch-card ballots, divining the intent of the unknown persons who mismanaged the ballots, because nothing must interfere with "every vote being counted." Meanwhile, bushels of signed absentee ballots, executed by people whose intentions could be ascertained by asking them, are tossed aside. Why? Because Gore benefits from this version of "don't ask, don't tell."

Nothing done by Gore's campaign to fiddle Florida's electorate surprises anyone who noticed the Justice Department's August report that pressure from Gore aides who "hoped for a political benefit" was "one stimulus" behind the hasty and slipshod program to naturalize more than 1 million new citizens in time for the 1996 election. And Democrats displayed their distinctive ferocity about securing power after Republicans gained 10 House seats in the 1992 congressional elections.

Democrats still had an 82-seat advantage. However, greed for power moved them to regain, in effect, five seats by giving to the five delegates from Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia--all these delegates Democrats, naturally--the right to vote on the floor when the House is functioning as a Committee of the Whole, in which mode most significant decisions are taken. This Democratic disregard of the Constitution--Article I, Section 2 uses the word "state" seven times in referring to the only entity from which members of the House may be chosen--was repealed when Republicans took control of the House in 1995.

Joe Lieberman, who, like Warren Christopher, understands how to use lugubriousness to mask partisanship, says, with solemn evenhandedness, that Republicans' "serious charges" about the recounting should be investigated by "local election officials." That is, by Democrats who control the Gore strongholds to which the recounting is confined.

Because early recounting suggested an insufficient harvest of new Gore votes, Gore asked Florida's Supreme Court to expand the universe of potential votes by ordering the re-counters to adopt more helpful (to Gore) criteria for what constitutes a vote properly cast in selected Gore strongholds. He also asked the court to forbid the state from certifying a winner, even though the loser would retain a de jure right to contest certification.

Gore knows that after certification, the country will not tolerate another peep from a lawyer. So this is a peculiar kind of capital case, because it will decide whether, for the plaintiff, life will go on.

Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.


11/17/00: Slow-motion larceny
11/13/00: Gore, Hungry for Power
11/09/00: No, the System Worked
11/06/00: The case for Bush
11/03/00: The Framers' Electoral wisdom
10/30/00: Political astronomy
10/27/00: Candidates condescending
10/23/00: No Partners For Peace
10/20/00: Talking peace with thugs
10/11/00: A feast of retreats
10/10/00: .. And what's gotten into the Danes?
10/05/00: The Agony of Debate
10/02/00: Senate Canvas
09/28/00: Milosevic: Not Another Saddam
09/25/00: Blaming the Voters
09/22/00: Saying No to the Euro
09/18/00: Farewell, Mr. Moynihan
09/14/00: When 'Choice' Rules
09/12/00: Colombia Illusions
09/08/00: Will He Spend It All?
09/04/00: Back in the U.S.S.R.
08/31/00: Stonewalling School Reform
08/28/00: Uphill for a California Republican
08/24/00: Sauerkraut Ice Cream
08/21/00: The Partial-Birth Censors
08/18/00: A Party to Prosperity
08/14/00: The National Scold on the Stump
08/10/00: The Thinking Person's Choice
08/07/00: The GOP of Powell And Rice
08/03/00: Panic in the Gore Camp
07/27/00: . . . Both Radical and Reassuring
07/06/00: Harry Potter: A Wizard's Return
07/03/00: Recalling the Revolution
06/29/00: An Act of Judicial Infamy
06/26/00: Life, Liberty and ... the Pursuit of Foxes
06/21/00: Fumble on Prayer
06/19/00: The unified field theory of culture
06/15/00: Schools Beset by Lawyers And Shrinks
06/12/00: Missile Defense Charade
06/07/00: The Grandparent Dissent
06/05/00: Liberal Condescension
06/01/00: Great Awakenings
05/30/00: Suddenly Social Security
05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money

© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group