Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review March 13, 2000 / 2 Adar II, 5760

George Will

George Will
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
David Corn
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports



Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling -- THIS MONTH the pulse of higher education reaches a crescendo with "March Madness," the college basketball championship tournament. So 'tis a season for a surge in sports gambling.

This is a problem for two reasons. One is that gambling on sports is pervasive and mostly illegal. Widespread and casual illegality undermines legality. The second reason is why Congress, in 1992, made almost all sports gambling illegal: Substantial sums wagered on sports events are potential threats to the integrity of the competition.

The mentality of modern government is to view every social defect as a problem ripe for legislative remedy, so Congress now is contemplating a measure that sets some sort of indoor record for missing the point. The social defect is illegal gambling on sports, much of it by students, much of it through bookies--often students--on campuses. The proposed legislative solution is to ban the only legal sports betting in America, that done in Nevada, where sports gambling is heavily regulated, closely supervised and restricted to persons who are at least 21 and physically present.

Supporters of extending the ban to Nevada say it will close a "loophole" in the 1992 law. But at that time Congress explicitly "grandfathered" Nevada, for which the NCAA has had reason to be glad: The 1994 point-shaving scandal involving some Arizona State University basketball players was discovered when Nevada sports books noticed suspicious patterns of wagering on ASU games.

Those who favor stripping Nevada of its right to decide what gambling should be legal there argue that doing so would end the practice of newspapers' publishing point spreads on college games, even though gambling on the games is illegal. But Nevada is hardly the only source of such spreads, and given the 50-state demand for sports gambling, someone is going to supply spreads.

Supporters of the legislation say Nevada is hypocritical because it bans wagers on Nevada teams. However, Frank Fahrenkopf of the American Gaming Association says the reason for the ban is that Nevada athletes are in proximity to bettors who can gamble legally on sports.

Last year the National Gambling Impact Study Commission estimated that as much as $380 billion may be wagered illegally on sports annually. Other estimates are as low as $80 billion. The fact that the estimates vary so much is a consequence of the illegality: Records are not kept. But even $80 billion makes Nevada's sports betting--in 1998, $2.3 billion on college and professional events--seem what it in fact is: not the problem.

The amount bet in Nevada on college events amounts to just one-third of the state's total sports betting. And there is no plausible theory, let alone persuasive evidence, that the legality of sports gambling in Nevada is responsible for sports gambling nationwide or for gambling scandals.

Gambling is as American as the state lotteries that helped fund the Revolution and many public works projects in the young republic. It is as American as today's frenzies over initial public offerings of stocks. And it is preposterous to blame Nevada for today's pandemic of gambling. That pandemic is, in a sense, a government program--your tax dollars at work.

If illegal sports gambling by young people is, as the NCAA warns, the "gateway" to other gambling, many American governments may rejoice. The principal promoters of gambling in America are the 47 of America's 50 states (all but Hawaii, Utah and Tennessee) and the many municipalities that run lotteries to raise revenues through the "voluntary taxation" of gambling or by permitting off-track wagering on horse racing, casino gambling, video poker, etc.

In 1998 Americans spent about $450 billion on groceries but made $630 billion in legal wagers and lost $50 billion of that (seven times more than they spent on movie tickets). As long as the culture sends the dangerous signal that gambling is a mainstream recreation no more problematic than bowling, it will be worse than pointless to deal with illegal sports gambling by making it illegal in the one state where it is legal and closely monitored. Besides, it is madness to think that the impulse to gamble can be controlled by legislation in the age of Internet gambling.

A final touch of madness: The NCAA, which recently sold to CBS an extension of the rights to "March Madness," including the "Final Four," for $6 billion over 11 years, has asked for federal money to fund NCAA work on youth gambling and illegal sports gambling.

Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.


03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money

© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group