Jewish World Review Feb. 16, 2001 / 23 Shevat, 5761
A truly inclusive holiday
THE nation is preparing to celebrate, with automobile and appliance and mattress sales, next Monday's national holiday, which,
as every schoolchild knows, is Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Adams, Jackson, Van Buren, Harrison,
Tyler, Polk, Taylor, Fillmore, Pierce, Buchanan, Lincoln, Johnson, Grant, Hayes, Garfield, Arthur, Cleveland, Harrison,
McKinley, Roosevelt, Taft, Wilson, Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon,
Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush Day. That is, Presidents' Day. Feel the excitement.
The excitement of the magical date -- this year -- of Feb. 19. Before 1971 the nation set aside two days -- the actual birthdays;
what a concept -- to show reverence for the foremost founder of the Republic and the man most responsible for preserving it.
Washington's birthday (Feb. 22) and Lincoln's (Feb. 12) were observed. However, what we revere nowadays are three-day
weekends, which boost the travel industry and sell dishwashers and mattresses.
"Inclusiveness," one of today's values, is served by Presidents' Day, which renders the Father of Our Country an equal
ingredient with Warren Harding in a bland pudding of presidents. Egalitarianism is served by Presidents Day, which conscripts
us into paying equal, if watery, respect to the author of the Gettysburg Address and the author of the Marc Rich pardon. And
the generic Presidents' Day serves a third contemporary obsession, "fairness." Time was, fairness involved treating like things
alike and unalike things unalike. But in this "nonjudgmental" age, fairness means treating everyone alike.
JWR's Greg Crosby, writing in the Weekly Standard, wonders what comes next. Change Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday to Civil
Rights Leaders day? Should Christmas become Religion Founders Day?
If, as Presidents' Day attests, remembrance no longer matters and commerce -- the three-day weekend of traveling and selling
-- trumps everything, let's get serious. Let's take the selling of naming rights to another level.
Cities and sports franchises sell such rights. Hence Pac Bell Park (San Francisco), RCA Dome (Indianapolis), Pepsi Center
(Denver) and so on, including the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl football game. Denver's mayor is still protesting the naming of the
Broncos' new football stadium as Invesco Field. He and many others think it should bear the venerable name of Mile High
Stadium. It is nice that at least something is venerated. But bet against the mayor.
Massachusetts is thinking spaciously in seeking sponsors for Boston subway stops. (A delicious possibility: "Next stop, the
National Rifle Association Station at Harvard Square.") But why stop there? What about: the General Motors White House.
The presidential limousine is, after all, a Cadillac. Ford could counter with the Lincoln-Mercury Lincoln Memorial.
Naming the Nike Capitol Building could be done tastefully: a single dignified white swoosh on the dome. That would not be an
eyesore to people across the street at the Microsoft Supreme Court building, which may someday be the scene of arguments
about the antitrust ruling against . . . never mind. There could even be naming rights for congressional districts, such as the Miller
Genuine Draft District (Milwaukee) or the Enron District (Houston).
And why not, if, as Presidents' Day announces, economic values are everything and we are more consumers than citizens?
Consumer sovereignty -- "voting by dollars" -- is popular sovereignty beyond the political sphere. And advertising, which
promises democratic distribution of pleasures, defines a uniqueness of American affluence. Historian Daniel Boorstin says
Europeans used to go to the marketplace to get what they wanted; now they, like Americans, have severed wants from needs
and go to the marketplace to discover what they want.
Television and, even more, the Internet bring the marketplace to the consumer. If shopping is an inherently public activity, what
inherently private space remains?
Advertising is the art of arresting attention in the hope that some commercially useful response may occur. In the sensory
blitzkrieg of life in this commercial republic, making that arrest is increasingly difficult. So perhaps government should, in the
name of economic growth, rent its buildings' names for advertising. It already has, in effect, sold off any serious contemplation
of the meaning of Washington's and Lincoln's birthdays, bartering that for the greater good, or so the government seems to
suppose, of stimulating economic activity over a three-day weekend of shopping and travel.
It is one thing, and on balance a good thing, to have a commercial republic in which many of mankind's turbulent passions and
disturbing inclinations are channeled into commerce, by which the public good is served. But surely two days could be devoted
to the appreciation of Washington and Lincoln, who understood how much more there is to public
Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.
02/12/01: Within the realm of Bush's tax cut
02/08/01: A season spoiled
02/05/01: Keeping faith behind initiatives
02/01/01: Tall order for a few federal dollars
01/29/01: You ain't seen nothin' yet
01/26/01: 'Art' Unburdened by Excellence
01/22/01: The monkey that could mean the end
01/19/01: The real enemy in the drug war
01/15/01: Congress just isn't big enough
01/12/01: Clinton's mark
01/08/01: All that is jazz
01/04/01: Bush's picks reveal Right attitude
01/02/01: Prosperity in perspective
12/28/00: Soft landing in a spoiled nation
12/26/00: When laws replace common sense
12/21/00: Beware the 'Bipartisanship'
12/18/00: ... A Brief Moment
12/13/00: Judicial activism on trial
12/11/00: Truth optional
12/06/00: A Chastened Court
12/01/00: Counting on some slippery language
11/28/00: Florida's rogue court
11/27/00: This willful court
11/22/00: Ferocity gap
11/17/00: Slow-motion larceny
11/13/00: Gore, Hungry for Power
11/09/00: No, the System Worked
11/06/00: The case for Bush
11/03/00: The Framers' Electoral wisdom
10/30/00: Political astronomy
10/27/00: Candidates condescending
10/23/00: No Partners For Peace
10/20/00: Talking peace with thugs
10/11/00: A feast of retreats
10/10/00: .. And what's gotten into the Danes?
10/05/00: The Agony of Debate
10/02/00: Senate Canvas
09/28/00: Milosevic: Not Another Saddam
09/25/00: Blaming the Voters
09/22/00: Saying No to the Euro
09/18/00: Farewell, Mr. Moynihan
09/14/00: When 'Choice' Rules
09/12/00: Colombia Illusions
09/08/00: Will He Spend It All?
09/04/00: Back in the U.S.S.R.
08/31/00: Stonewalling School Reform
08/28/00: Uphill for a California Republican
08/24/00: Sauerkraut Ice Cream
08/21/00: The Partial-Birth Censors
08/18/00: A Party to Prosperity
08/14/00: The National Scold on the Stump
08/10/00: The Thinking Person's Choice
08/07/00: The GOP of Powell And Rice
08/03/00: Panic in the Gore Camp
07/27/00: . . . Both Radical and Reassuring
07/06/00: Harry Potter: A Wizard's Return
07/03/00: Recalling the Revolution
06/29/00: An Act of Judicial Infamy
06/26/00: Life, Liberty and ... the Pursuit of Foxes
06/21/00: Fumble on Prayer
06/19/00: The unified field theory of culture
06/15/00: Schools Beset by Lawyers And Shrinks
06/12/00: Missile Defense Charade
06/07/00: The Grandparent Dissent
06/05/00: Liberal Condescension
06/01/00: Great Awakenings
05/30/00: Suddenly Social Security
05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money
© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group