Jewish World Review April 2, 2001 / 9 Nissan, 5761
The strike zone restored
PHOENIX -- America overflows with specious "victims" demanding redress for spurious grievances. However, one genuinely oppressed minority is getting overdue relief. Beginning with spring training in Arizona and Florida, Major League Baseball, taking pity on traumatized pitchers, is directing umpires to enforce the strike zone as defined in the rulebook.
What a concept. And what a lesson there is in this about the vagaries of reform.
The "new" strike zone was actually defined years ago when Major League Baseball shrank the zone in an attempt to enlarge it. Or, more precisely, to entice umpires to quit calling idiosyncratic strike zones much smaller than the official one.
Through most of the 20th century the strike zone was defined as a rectangle extending over the 17-inch-wide plate, from the batter's shoulders to his knees. Actually, the rectangle is about 22 inches wide, because a pitch is a strike if any part of the ball crosses the plate, the width of which thus is, effectively, 17 inches plus the width of two baseballs. However, for many reasons -- one was that home plate umpires quit wearing mattress-style chest protectors outside their clothing, and so could more easily crouch and see low pitches -- umpires stopped calling high strikes. Pitches above the belt were rarely called strikes. The rectangle became turned on its side -- the top, at the belt of the pants; the outer edge extending several inches off the plate.
In 1995, hoping to turn the rectangle from horizontal back to vertical by tugging the strike zone up and in, baseball redefined the bottom of the zone as "the top of the knees" and the top as "the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants" -- about 2 1/2 ball widths, or about seven inches above the belt. But the umpires still refused to call higher strikes, and in 1996 baseball surrendered to them, lowering the zone to "the hollow beneath the kneecap."
As the strike zone became smaller, so did ballparks, and batters became bigger. Pitchers nibbled around the shrunken strike zone. Huge hitters waited as pitch counts mounted. Complete games by pitchers became rare, and hitting feasted on middle-inning relief pitching, baseball's most mediocre commodity. Offense became too predominant. Base stealing became too infrequent -- why risk it, with bulked-up hitters waiting for fat pitches in a shoebox-sized strike zone? And games became too long.
Just 20 years ago, the average game length was two hours and 34 minutes. Last year in the American League, home of the designated hitter, the average game was three hours long. This is largely the result of the incredibly shrinking strike zone. So is this: Last year 26.7 percent of all at-bats resulted in either a walk or a strikeout. No ball put in play. Feel the excitement.
Clark Griffith, owner of the hapless Washington Senators, once said, "Fans like home runs and we have assembled a pitching staff to please our fans." Fans like offense, so when pitching got too strong in 1968 (21 percent of all games were shutouts; the highest American League batting average was .301; the Yankees batted .214) reformers did what reformers do: overreacted. The height of the pitcher's mound was lowered from 15 inches to 10 inches, fences were moved in, the strike zone slowly shrank, and in 1973 the designated hitter arrived.
Today, experts say the new strike zone -- slightly narrower but seven inches higher -- will help pitchers, who will have as much as 30 percent more space to pitch to. And experts say it will shorten games because batters will be swinging sooner instead of looking for walks. And experts say the new zone will help hitters, who will prosper hitting higher pitches and will be spared the need to swing at balls off the outside corner of the plate. And experts say games will be longer because the strike zone will increase the number of hits. And experts say it will shorten games because, walks being less likely, more balls will be quickly put into play, most of them for outs.
It is axiomatic: People are conservative about what they know. So professional baseball people, and serious fans, generally believe that any change, at any time, for any reason, is lamentable. Which is generally true, in baseball as in the little remainder of life. But this year's change is really just a restoration. Besides, experts agree that under the restored zone, good pitchers and good hitters will excel. About this, at least, the experts are right, because it is a
Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.
03/3001: The Senate's Comic Opera
03/26/01: A second decade of economic trouble?
03/22/01: McCainism, the McCarthyism of today's "progressives"
03/19/01: Skirting what the First Amendment says
03/16/01: The SAT's thankless task
03/12/01: Fending Off the Speech Police
03/08/01: Democrat turnabout?
03/05/01: Let us hope not!
03/01/01: Duck! Our racial and ethnic spoils system is spinning out of control
02/26/01: Common Sense and the Constitution
02/22/01: Brooklyn's Artsy Dodgers
02/20/01: Whose surplus is it, anyway?
02/16/01: A truly inclusive holiday
02/12/01: Within the realm of Bush's tax cut
02/08/01: A season spoiled
02/05/01: Keeping faith behind initiatives
02/01/01: Tall order for a few federal dollars
01/29/01: You ain't seen nothin' yet
01/26/01: 'Art' Unburdened by Excellence
01/22/01: The monkey that could mean the end
01/19/01: The real enemy in the drug war
01/15/01: Congress just isn't big enough
01/12/01: Clinton's mark
01/08/01: All that is jazz
01/04/01: Bush's picks reveal Right attitude
01/02/01: Prosperity in perspective
12/28/00: Soft landing in a spoiled nation
12/26/00: When laws replace common sense
12/21/00: Beware the 'Bipartisanship'
12/18/00: ... A Brief Moment
12/13/00: Judicial activism on trial
12/11/00: Truth optional
12/06/00: A Chastened Court
12/01/00: Counting on some slippery language
11/28/00: Florida's rogue court
11/27/00: This willful court
11/22/00: Ferocity gap
11/17/00: Slow-motion larceny
11/13/00: Gore, Hungry for Power
11/09/00: No, the System Worked
11/06/00: The case for Bush
11/03/00: The Framers' Electoral wisdom
10/30/00: Political astronomy
10/27/00: Candidates condescending
10/23/00: No Partners For Peace
10/20/00: Talking peace with thugs
10/11/00: A feast of retreats
10/10/00: .. And what's gotten into the Danes?
10/05/00: The Agony of Debate
10/02/00: Senate Canvas
09/28/00: Milosevic: Not Another Saddam
09/25/00: Blaming the Voters
09/22/00: Saying No to the Euro
09/18/00: Farewell, Mr. Moynihan
09/14/00: When 'Choice' Rules
09/12/00: Colombia Illusions
09/08/00: Will He Spend It All?
09/04/00: Back in the U.S.S.R.
08/31/00: Stonewalling School Reform
08/28/00: Uphill for a California Republican
08/24/00: Sauerkraut Ice Cream
08/21/00: The Partial-Birth Censors
08/18/00: A Party to Prosperity
08/14/00: The National Scold on the Stump
08/10/00: The Thinking Person's Choice
08/07/00: The GOP of Powell And Rice
08/03/00: Panic in the Gore Camp
07/27/00: . . . Both Radical and Reassuring
07/06/00: Harry Potter: A Wizard's Return
07/03/00: Recalling the Revolution
06/29/00: An Act of Judicial Infamy
06/26/00: Life, Liberty and ... the Pursuit of Foxes
06/21/00: Fumble on Prayer
06/19/00: The unified field theory of culture
06/15/00: Schools Beset by Lawyers And Shrinks
06/12/00: Missile Defense Charade
06/07/00: The Grandparent Dissent
06/05/00: Liberal Condescension
06/01/00: Great Awakenings
05/30/00: Suddenly Social Security
05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money
© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group