Jewish World Review June 10, 2002 /1 Tamuz, 5762

Jack Kemp

Jack Kemp
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

New role models for Africa | Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and rock star Bono just wrapped up a "fact-finding" tour of sub-Saharan Africa, during which they drew attention to the poverty and underdevelopment that afflict the continent. While Bono held press conferences criticizing America for being stingy with foreign aid, O'Neill tried to figure out immediate and efficient ways to put American aid to its best use in alleviating the misery in which too many Africans live. He calculated, for example, that it would require about $25 million to drill a sufficient number of wells to provide clean drinking water for 10 million Ugandans.

Unfortunately, some nongovernmental-organization types were eager to explain that what seemed straightforward to O'Neill was really complicated and required money doled out through U.N. programs by international-aid bureaucrats. The New York Times reported how one NGO bureaucrat insisted that drilling and maintaining wells was beyond the capabilities of Ugandans unless undertaken within a structured aid program funded and overseen by -- you guessed it -- international agencies. What arrogance!

Countries are poor because their governments choose bad policies and because facets of their culture and values stifle the natural inclination of individuals to better their lot by working, saving and investing in the future. It may be true that some countries have been driven to such depths of poverty and despair by corrupt, oppressive and brutal leaders that special aid and advice from the United States are required to kick-start development that otherwise would take many years to accomplish.

It is also true that America has adopted protectionist measures that not only hurt our own economy but also throw up more obstacles to the developing world's efforts to modernize. Even the positive Africa Growth and Opportunity Act of 2000 contains American domestic content rules that restrict exports of the two value-added products Africans have, textiles and agricultural products.

No wonder Africans, and most everyone else, consider it duplicitous for America to send in the IMF and World Bank to insist that everyone else lower tariffs, eliminate corporate and farm subsidies, and open their markets to foreign trade while we maintain protectionist tariffs and government subsidies on everything from steel and lumber to agricultural products and textiles.

The fundamental problem in places like sub-Saharan Africa can be traced back to what happened after World War II, when most of the European continent and England turned to highly centralized economic policies, including nationalization of industry in an effort to rebuild their societies. Trickle-down socialism dripped into African colonies, where misguided socialist growth and economic development policies persisted even after independence. When those strategies didn't work, the vestiges of colonialism was fingered as the cause, and foreign aid was taken by guilt-ridden former colonialists to be the solution.

Central planning, government ownership and a preoccupation with equality of outcomes slowed growth and impoverished these nations. Foreign aid combined with socialism to foster political corruption and prevented democratic capitalism from ever gaining a foothold.

As a Wall Street Journal editorial pointed out recently, the nations of sub-Saharan Africa have for many years been at the top of the list of foreign aid recipients while they also have the dubious distinction of continuing to be ranked at the bottom of the list in the Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom. Thanks to leaders like presidents Abdoulaye Wade of Senegal, John Kufour of Ghana, Yoweri Museveni of Uganda and Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria, that's about to change.

These leaders understand that economic advancement and social improvement can only be realized through open trade and policies that promote free markets, private property and entrepreneurial enterprise. As Wade observes, "I've never seen a country develop itself through aid or credit."

Museveni is even more explicit: "For too long, Africans and their partners in the West have looked to international aid as the answer to the poverty. There is now a broad agreement that no national or international strategy for addressing poverty can be successful unless it promotes expanded trade and investment."

The goals and strategies of these new African leaders are congruent with the goals of a summit initiated before his death last year by the great civil rights leader Dr. Leon H. Sullivan. The African-African American Summit is chaired by Ambassador Andrew Young, with whom I am proud to serve as vice chairman. This month we will meet to bring together American and African business and political leaders to discuss issues crucial to sub-Sahara Africa, such as trade, investment, education and health care. We will continue to discuss ways and means to promote democratization, economic growth and social progress on the African continent, looking to these African role models to help lead the way.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Jack Kemp is co-director of Empower America and Distinguished Fellow of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Comment by clicking here.


05/02/02: What wasn't heard out of Crawford
04/25/02: In search of Arab dignity
04/16/02: Taxes and history lessons
04/09/02: Arabs must take a stand against terrorism
04/02/02: Nuevo dependencia and world government
03/26/02: Bureaucratic buffoonery at the INS
03/19/02: California's newest citizen politician
03/06/02: Peaceful relations or public relations?
02/27/02: American trade policy at war with itself
02/20/02: Three-conjecture strategy on global warming
02/14/02: Nurturing democratic capitalism in Afghanistan
02/06/02: Gephardt embraces tax cuts and tax simplification
01/30/02: Just the facts
01/22/02: 'Been down so long it looks like up to me'
01/15/02: Confronting terror wherever it occurs
01/09/02: Daschle's war on Bush
01/03/02: Prosperity policies, not partisan politics
12/27/01: Governments create calamity, markets get the blame
12/18/01: 'Tis the season for Daschle to compromise
12/12/01: Hard choices made simple
12/05/01: Straight talk on Iraq
11/28/01: Not all tax cuts are created equal
11/20/01: Words have consequences
11/15/01: Deflationary recession
11/07/01: Consider Mideast reality in the war on terrorism
10/30/01: No 'stimulus' required
10/23/01: Good out of evil
10/16/01: Watching Iraq
10/12/01: The putrid stench of evil
10/04/01: Trade, terror and truth
10/01/01: Drive this scourge from the face of the Earth
09/25/01: Bush emerges as leader for his time
09/06/01: Middle East Madness has a chief instigator
08/30/01: It's about economic growth, stupid!
08/22/01: Phlebotomizers at the IMF
08/17/01: The Greenspan Recession
08/08/01: From Kyoto to Bonn, no science equals nonsense
07/25/01: Fiddling while the world economy freezes
07/19/01: Schundler should be New Jersey's next governor
07/12/01: Second wind for the global economy
07/06/01: An interest-rate target with no bull's-eye
06/28/01: Tax harmonization --- American-style
06/21/01: Warming diplomacy --- at what price?
06/13/01: A party that stands for nothing deserves to lose
06/07/01: No peace in the Middle East
05/30/01: Jeffords' palace coup
05/24/01: A supply-side energy plan
05/16/01: Getting Lincoln right
05/10/01: A good reason to borrow
05/01/01: Supreme Court makes racial profiling the law of the land
04/26/01: Campaign finance reform: silencing the lambs
04/17/01: Right wanted might in China case
04/12/01: How minority entrepreneurs can save the tax cut
04/04/01: Whose privacy is it?
03/29/01: A letter from Seoul
03/20/01: Ignore the double talk and double the tax cuts
03/13/01: Don't give up the bully pulpit on Social Security, Mr. President
03/06/01: Another attack on the economy
02/28/01: It's time to end deflation
02/21/01: Building blocks of humanity
02/15/01: Trumping the propaganda
02/06/01: The Gipper at 90
01/30/01: Kicking off a season of economic growth
01/24/01: The Bush tax agenda
01/17/01: Debating the Clinton legacy
01/10/01: No need for another Social Security commission
01/03/01: Truly a Golden Age, if we can keep it
12/27/00: The Grinch who turned off the holiday lights
12/20/00: Forging ahead
12/13/00: A new tax system for the 21st Century
12/07/00: Global government in retreat
11/30/00: An open letter to Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan
11/21/00: Don't forget the guy in charge
11/15/00: Civic virtue, civic vice
11/08/00: Memo to the president-elect
10/31/00: Scare tactics won't work
10/24/00: Prosperity in the balance
10/11/00: Al Gore's economics of fear
10/03/00: Al Gore IS debatable
09/27/00: Government should protect our online privacy
09/13/00: The most important issue
09/05/00: Defeating the Gore blitz
08/29/00: Workers of the world, rejoice
08/22/00: Just the facts, Mr. President
08/08/00: Reclaiming Lincoln's legacy
06/23/00: A renaissance for urban America?
06/16/00: Capital access can bridge 'digital divide'
06/08/00: Some friendly advice for Rick Lazio
05/26/00: Is the economy being saved or destroyed?
05/22/00: Immigration and the promise that is America
05/12/00: Stock market roulette or snobbery?
05/04/00: Is Rule of Law whatever we say it is?
05/01/00: Myths happen

© 2002, Copley News Service