Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review May 16, 2001 / 23 Iyar, 5761

Jack Kemp

Jack Kemp
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Getting Lincoln right --
LAST year Lerone Bennett, a distinguished African-American scholar from the left side of the political spectrum, published an attack on Abraham Lincoln, "Forced Into Glory." On the right, columnist Joe Sobran, who along with Pat Buchanan regularly attacks Lincoln, gave a speech at Christendom College that echoes many of the same charges. This antagonism against Lincoln, from both the right and left, always carries the same criticisms: Lincoln really wasn't opposed to slavery, Lincoln did not believe blacks should vote or serve on juries, and he thought blacks should be colonized in other countries. It worries me that they agree, albeit for different reasons. I take umbrage when the president known as "The Great Emancipator" is subjected to ad hominem attacks.

The 16th president concluded his second inaugural by saying: "With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as G-d gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations."

President Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth less than two months later. Unlike Booth, however, assassins of Lincoln's character miss by a mile.

The charge that Lincoln opposed blacks having the right to vote, to serve on juries, to hold public office or to marry outside their race was a charge made against Lincoln both in his Senate and presidential campaigns. What Lincoln famously said (and ignored by his critics) in refuting this charge was, "there is no reason in the world why the Negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I hold that he is as much entitled to these as the white man." While Lincoln said that the black man may not be his equal in some respects, he believed that "in the right to eat the bread, without leave of anybody else, which his own hand earns, he (the black man) is my equal ... and the equal of every living man."

As a member of Congress in 1848, Lincoln intended, as his first piece of legislation, an act to eliminate slavery in Washington, D.C. This act did not garner enough support to pass, but when one looks to his prosecution of the Civil War and his campaign for the 13th Amendment, as well as his statements and actions during the war, one can see that Lincoln did advance his beliefs regarding black civil rights over time. His 1864 re-election was a referendum on the 13th Amendment, then pending in Congress, which would free all slaves, outlaw slavery forever, and provide Congress with the power to make and enforce civil rights laws.

Lincoln was a man of his time, but he was also a man who transcended his time. As Frederick Douglass said of Lincoln, "Measuring by the sentiment of his country, a sentiment he was bound as a statesman to consult, he was swift, zealous, radical and determined."

Lincoln may not have been a pure "abolitionist," as critics indict, but the abolitionists of Lincoln's day had no chance of electoral victory and Lincoln knew that. Without electoral success, nothing would have ever been done to advance the cause of full emancipation.

Lincoln worked toward the emancipation of slaves by constitutional means. As John Stuart Mill wrote at the time: "Abolitionists, in America, mean those who do not keep within the Constitution; the Republican party neither aim nor profess to aim at this object. ... If they have not taken arms against slavery, they have against its extension. And they know ... that this amounts to the same thing. The day when slavery can no longer extend itself, is the day of its doom. The slave owners know this, and it is the cause of their fury."

Critics of Lincoln seem not to know what Southern secessionists knew: Lincoln was opposed to slavery, calling it a "monstrous evil" - that's why seven states seceded before he was even sworn into office. From that secession, an illegal act, Lincoln knew he had but one course to take: saving the Union. Lincoln knew that the cause of the Union, predicated on our declaration of "equality," was the cause of freedom for all. Lincoln was the first president of the United States to invite blacks to the White House. So sincere were these meetings that Douglass wrote, "I was impressed with his entire freedom from popular prejudice against the colored race. He was the first great man that I talked with in the United States freely, who in no single instance reminded me of the difference between himself and myself."

In his most famous speech, the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. said he wanted a society where people were judged "not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." It was no accident that he gave that speech in front of the Lincoln Memorial.

Jack Kemp is co-director of Empower America and Distinguished Fellow of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Comment by clicking here.


05/10/01: A good reason to borrow
05/01/01: Supreme Court makes racial profiling the law of the land
04/26/01: Campaign finance reform: silencing the lambs
04/17/01: Right wanted might in China case
04/12/01: How minority entrepreneurs can save the tax cut
04/04/01: Whose privacy is it?
03/29/01: A letter from Seoul
03/20/01: Ignore the double talk and double the tax cuts
03/13/01: Don't give up the bully pulpit on Social Security, Mr. President
03/06/01: Another attack on the economy
02/28/01: It's time to end deflation
02/21/01: Building blocks of humanity
02/15/01: Trumping the propaganda
02/06/01: The Gipper at 90
01/30/01: Kicking off a season of economic growth
01/24/01: The Bush tax agenda
01/17/01: Debating the Clinton legacy
01/10/01: No need for another Social Security commission
01/03/01: Truly a Golden Age, if we can keep it
12/27/00: The Grinch who turned off the holiday lights
12/20/00: Forging ahead
12/13/00: A new tax system for the 21st Century
12/07/00: Global government in retreat
11/30/00: An open letter to Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan
11/21/00: Don't forget the guy in charge
11/15/00: Civic virtue, civic vice
11/08/00: Memo to the president-elect
10/31/00: Scare tactics won't work
10/24/00: Prosperity in the balance
10/11/00: Al Gore's economics of fear
10/03/00: Al Gore IS debatable
09/27/00: Government should protect our online privacy
09/13/00: The most important issue
09/05/00: Defeating the Gore blitz
08/29/00: Workers of the world, rejoice
08/22/00: Just the facts, Mr. President
08/08/00: Reclaiming Lincoln's legacy
06/23/00: A renaissance for urban America?
06/16/00: Capital access can bridge 'digital divide'
06/08/00: Some friendly advice for Rick Lazio
05/26/00: Is the economy being saved or destroyed?
05/22/00: Immigration and the promise that is America
05/12/00: Stock market roulette or snobbery?
05/04/00: Is Rule of Law whatever we say it is?
05/01/00: Myths happen

© 2000, Copley News Service