Jewish World Review April 2, 2002 / 20 Nisan, 5762

Jack Kemp

Jack Kemp
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Nuevo dependencia and world government | Foreign aid is never enough for the left and always too much for the right; however, President George W. Bush did the wise thing last month when he announced that the United States will contribute $5 billion over the next three years into a new Millennium Challenge Account to fund initiatives to help developing nations improve their economies and raise their standards of living. Looking ahead to the International Conference on Financing Development in Monterrey, Mexico, the president said, "In Monterrey, we have a tremendous opportunity to begin acting on a new vision of development ... (that) unleashes the potential of those who are poor, instead of locking them into a cycle of dependence. This new vision looks beyond arbitrary inputs from the rich and demands tangible outcomes for the poor."

What a surprise this must have been to the U.N. bureaucracy and its attendant aid and finance agencies, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, which are facing withering criticism for their stupendous failures and had hoped to use Monterrey to blame their failures on a lack of funding.

In 1999, the Meltzer Commission, appointed by Congress to review international development and finance institutions, delivered a devastating assessment of their failures, finding them to be "overstaffed, ineffective, bureaucratic institutions." A 1998 unpublicized internal World Bank report chronicled its history of failures, and a new book by World Bank economist William Easterly, "The Elusive Quest for Growth," pronounces the World Bank a spectacular failure over its 50-year history.

The United Nations and its international financial bureaucracies were poised to use Monterrey as a fulcrum on which to leverage past failures into more funding, enhanced power and expanded reach to inflict more ill-conceived policies -- high tax rates, fiscal austerity, floating currencies and currency devaluation -- on poor countries. Bush headed them off at the pass by offering an alternative vision of economic assistance in which grants are tied to rules of accountability and made conditional on recipients' making demonstrable progress in reforms that build democracy, strengthen and enforce the rule of law, and unleash free markets.

By contrast, how disheartening it was last week in Monterrey to hear Mexican President Vicente Fox call on the United Nations to levy global taxes "as a steppingstone on the path toward development for all." This is simply a thinly veiled call for elevating the United Nations to the status of world government and empowering it with taxing authority to effect a global redistribution of income. It was, therefore, frightening to hear Patrick Cronin, assistant administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development say, "In the right time, there could be a serious discussion about global taxes."

Beneath the clamor for more World Bank handouts, global taxes and global income redistribution, there is a mistaken notion that developed nations prosper at the expense of poor nations. In the 1960s, it was unabashed Marxism going by the title of dependencia economic theory that claimed developing countries were "lost in the labyrinth" and that the international trading system was condemning the "periphery" -- Latin America and other developing countries -- to enduring poverty, exploitation and dependency.

Today, most political leaders accept the reality that it's bad policies that retard economic growth and that open trade, free markets, foreign as well as domestic investment, private property and the rule of law allow countries to grow and prosper.

Yet the foundational premise of "dependencia" theory -- the belief that successful economies prosper by exploiting poor countries and despoiling the environment -- continues to infect the thinking of political leaders. Call it nuevo dependencia or "Third Way dependencia"; either way it's a form of "soft socialism," a self-fulfilling prophecy that stifles economic growth and consigns poor countries to permanent dependency on global government.

It represents a misguided ideology premised on the belief that global markets inevitably produce a widening gap between rich and poor nations unless a world government equipped with taxing, spending and redistributing authority is empowered to "harness" and "channel" them. Nuevo dependencia is a self-fulfilling prophecy destined to stifle economic growth and create permanent Third World dependency on global government.

Bravo to Bush for having the daring to refute this neo-leftist nonsense. The Mexican president's flirtation with this trendy theory, on the other hand, is ironic and tragic because it is at such odds with his otherwise clear-headed vision of what it takes for developing countries to prosper and grow, including a clear understanding of the two great political impediments to growth and development -- protectionist taxes and subsidies.

Every country, rich and poor, holds its economic destiny in its own hands and has the wherewithal to generate economic growth. It is a nation's people, its human capital, that form the engine for economic growth if they are taxed gently and left free of burdensome regulations and restrictions to take risks and work hard to achieve their full potential.

Jack Kemp is co-director of Empower America and Distinguished Fellow of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Comment by clicking here.


03/26/02: Bureaucratic buffoonery at the INS
03/19/02: California's newest citizen politician
03/06/02: Peaceful relations or public relations?
02/27/02: American trade policy at war with itself
02/20/02: Three-conjecture strategy on global warming
02/14/02: Nurturing democratic capitalism in Afghanistan
02/06/02: Gephardt embraces tax cuts and tax simplification
01/30/02: Just the facts
01/22/02: 'Been down so long it looks like up to me'
01/15/02: Confronting terror wherever it occurs
01/09/02: Daschle's war on Bush
01/03/02: Prosperity policies, not partisan politics
12/27/01: Governments create calamity, markets get the blame
12/18/01: 'Tis the season for Daschle to compromise
12/12/01: Hard choices made simple
12/05/01: Straight talk on Iraq
11/28/01: Not all tax cuts are created equal
11/20/01: Words have consequences
11/15/01: Deflationary recession
11/07/01: Consider Mideast reality in the war on terrorism
10/30/01: No 'stimulus' required
10/23/01: Good out of evil
10/16/01: Watching Iraq
10/12/01: The putrid stench of evil
10/04/01: Trade, terror and truth
10/01/01: Drive this scourge from the face of the Earth
09/25/01: Bush emerges as leader for his time
09/06/01: Middle East Madness has a chief instigator
08/30/01: It's about economic growth, stupid!
08/22/01: Phlebotomizers at the IMF
08/17/01: The Greenspan Recession
08/08/01: From Kyoto to Bonn, no science equals nonsense
07/25/01: Fiddling while the world economy freezes
07/19/01: Schundler should be New Jersey's next governor
07/12/01: Second wind for the global economy
07/06/01: An interest-rate target with no bull's-eye
06/28/01: Tax harmonization --- American-style
06/21/01: Warming diplomacy --- at what price?
06/13/01: A party that stands for nothing deserves to lose
06/07/01: No peace in the Middle East
05/30/01: Jeffords' palace coup
05/24/01: A supply-side energy plan
05/16/01: Getting Lincoln right
05/10/01: A good reason to borrow
05/01/01: Supreme Court makes racial profiling the law of the land
04/26/01: Campaign finance reform: silencing the lambs
04/17/01: Right wanted might in China case
04/12/01: How minority entrepreneurs can save the tax cut
04/04/01: Whose privacy is it?
03/29/01: A letter from Seoul
03/20/01: Ignore the double talk and double the tax cuts
03/13/01: Don't give up the bully pulpit on Social Security, Mr. President
03/06/01: Another attack on the economy
02/28/01: It's time to end deflation
02/21/01: Building blocks of humanity
02/15/01: Trumping the propaganda
02/06/01: The Gipper at 90
01/30/01: Kicking off a season of economic growth
01/24/01: The Bush tax agenda
01/17/01: Debating the Clinton legacy
01/10/01: No need for another Social Security commission
01/03/01: Truly a Golden Age, if we can keep it
12/27/00: The Grinch who turned off the holiday lights
12/20/00: Forging ahead
12/13/00: A new tax system for the 21st Century
12/07/00: Global government in retreat
11/30/00: An open letter to Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan
11/21/00: Don't forget the guy in charge
11/15/00: Civic virtue, civic vice
11/08/00: Memo to the president-elect
10/31/00: Scare tactics won't work
10/24/00: Prosperity in the balance
10/11/00: Al Gore's economics of fear
10/03/00: Al Gore IS debatable
09/27/00: Government should protect our online privacy
09/13/00: The most important issue
09/05/00: Defeating the Gore blitz
08/29/00: Workers of the world, rejoice
08/22/00: Just the facts, Mr. President
08/08/00: Reclaiming Lincoln's legacy
06/23/00: A renaissance for urban America?
06/16/00: Capital access can bridge 'digital divide'
06/08/00: Some friendly advice for Rick Lazio
05/26/00: Is the economy being saved or destroyed?
05/22/00: Immigration and the promise that is America
05/12/00: Stock market roulette or snobbery?
05/04/00: Is Rule of Law whatever we say it is?
05/01/00: Myths happen

© 2002, Copley News Service