Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review May 9, 2005 / 30 Nissan 5765

John H. Fund

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The Personal ‘Lockbox’: How to break the logjam on Social Security reform | Many supporters of Social Security reform are already declaring it a lost cause. Columnist Charles Krauthammer says the idea "isn't dead, but it's pretty sick." Fred Barnes of The Weekly Standard says President Bush needs an "exit strategy" because "it's hard to see how a reform measure can pass." Bill Kristol, editor of the Standard, says that if the White House is "willing to unwind the Social Security proposal and accept defeat sometime this year, it won't do them any damage" in next year's elections.

All of this gloom is premature. There are ways for Mr. Bush to turn the political tables on his opponents. He made a start by endorsing the progressive indexing of Social Security benefits, which would ensure the bottom 30% of wage earners would all get benefits that lift them above the poverty line. He could combine that with a bold move to protect the $2.2 trillion in Social Security surpluses flowing into the system over the next nine years from being "raided" by a spendthrift Congress.

One way to do that would be to create a true "lockbox" that allows people to put their share of the surplus into their own personal account to help fund their retirement. But the account would be limited to no-risk, but marketable, Treasury bills. Every taxpayer who voluntarily chose to create a T-Bill personal account would, in effect, own the key to his own lockbox, containing a significant chunk of their future benefits. The surpluses would become real assets owned by citizens rather than government IOUs  —  or, more accurate, "I owe me's"  —  piling up in a filing cabinet in a federal office in West Virginia.

Everyone knows that if nothing is done Congress  —  regardless of which party controls it  —  will spend every penny of the Social Security surpluses that will flow into the Treasury until 2017, after which the cost of benefits going out will begin exceeding the revenue coming in. Those surpluses will not go into a true "trust fund" with real assets, but instead into those IOUs, which David Walker, head of the Governmental Accountability Office, says "give a very false sense of security about where we are and how much time we have" until insolvency. Converting the nonmarketable IOUs the government now holds into marketable Treasury bills issued to taxpayers would create an asset that individuals would own and be able to pass on to their heirs. If history is a guide, the risk-free accounts would earn an annual rate of return of between 2.5% and 3%  —  much better than Social Security will deliver.

Politically, such a move would change the conversation and could break the logjam blocking reform. Mr. Bush has made some headway in recent weeks convincing the American people there is a Social Security problem. But he has failed to convince Democrats in Congress that they would pay a price for opposing reform. He must move quickly from a theoretical plan Democrats can attack as "privatization" to a concrete one which allows him to explain the benefits. What if Bush forced Congress to vote on a plan that protected the most vulnerable wage earners, put the Social Security surpluses of the next dozen years out of the reach of politicians, and put those funds to productive use in the economy? "It wouldn't be something Democrats would enjoy voting on," says a former Democratic staff director for a congressional committee. "They don't want to actually vote against private accounts. Their goal is to kill the idea before it gets to that point."

But the power of personal accounts is such that the idea refuses to die. A new OpinionDynamics poll found overwhelming support for the concept of "choice" in retirement options. Many Americans are aware that the 1983 payroll-tax increases intended to fix Social Security were spent on other programs and know the money won't be there to pay all the benefits promised to them.

Last March the man who crafted that 1983 solution, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, told a Senate committee that Congress's spending of the surplus means "we need to ensure that measures taken now to finance future benefit commitments represent real additions to national saving. . . . We need, in effect, to make the phantom 'lockboxes' around the trust fund real." He went on to say that private accounts would increase national savings and putting future Social Security surpluses in a "lockbox" could finally force Congress to get serious about restraining spending.

Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, who along with Sen. John Sununu of New Hampshire wrote the plan that creates the largest personal accounts, agrees. He says the current system allows the government to mask the size of the current deficit by using Social Security surpluses. "Maybe the only way to achieve the spending restraint needed to create private accounts is to expose just how much spending has gone out of control," he told me.

Robert Pozen, the investment banker and John Kerry supporter who developed the progressive indexing idea Mr. Bush has embraced, thinks it won't happen. He told CNBC's Larry Kudlow that he's "all for" starting personal accounts now with current Social Security surpluses  —  "if you can do it." But he believes politicians won't be able to give up using surpluses to hide the size of the deficit. Unlike Mr. Greenspan, he believes convincing the White House and Congress to reduce spending is "just totally unrealistic."

Indeed, some White House aides resist the idea of putting Social Security surpluses in personal lockboxes. Truth-in-budgeting would create the appearance of a ballooning deficit and expose the White House to charges its deficit-reduction projections were hollow. Still, Steve Moore, head of the Free Enterprise Fund, says their attitude could change: "The time may come when the White House has to ask what it prefers: a nonreal, apparent increase in the deficit or winning the creation of small private accounts that will become more politically popular over time." The personal lockbox may prove a popular enough idea to break a Senate filibuster, and in any event the president could even try to create personal accounts from the surpluses for a single year by attaching the plan to a must-pass appropriations bill that would require only a majority vote to pass. He could then dare Democrats to kill the accounts once they have been created.

Rep. Bill Thomas, the hard-charging chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, is also looking at ways to put the Social Security surpluses to work. Last week, he told CNBC's Mr. Kudlow that the GAO was studying the issue. "What would be the difference if we could move [the surpluses] to marketable securities?" he asked. "It would create an instrument that we could transfer" to individuals. A source close to Mr. Thomas told me that the personal lockbox for Social Security surpluses "could be a political master stroke." Adding the idea of allowing people to save for long-term health-care insurance would be a political and policy sweetener.

A lockbox filled with T-Bills also might be easier to explain than the president's current plan. "We've learned from the last two months that many people view the idea of personal accounts as confusing, they don't know they would be voluntary, they worry about diverting a portion of payroll taxes away from Social Security, and they think the accounts might be 'risky,' " says Alex Pollock, a banker now working at the American Enterprise Institute.

Mr. Pollock says people could better understand having the Social Security surpluses go directly into private accounts. He would fill the accounts with a version of the popular Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, or TIPS. After a transition period, account holders could be given the freedom to trade their TIPS for other instruments, such as annuities, private-sector bonds or blue-chip stocks. He notes that such accounts wouldn't require huge upfront borrowing by the federal government. "Alex's plan is simple, understandable and effective and could begin immediately," says economist Alan Meltzer. "It would reveal opponents of reform as mostly concerned about having government keep control of the surpluses."

Mr. Pollock's idea has several precedents. The federal employee retirement program allows money to go into a fund that invests solely in Treasuries. The T-Bill Accounts would resemble another familiar long-term savings vehicle: the payroll deduction for U.S. savings bonds. Rep. Nancy Johnson of Connecticut, a leading GOP moderate, points out that in 1999 Bill Clinton advocated "investing Social Security surplus dollars into the private [stock] market." How much safer would personal accounts limited to T-bills look? The AARP's argument that people could lose their money in Las Vegas-style investments would go out the window.

In political terms, even more important than the safety and familiarity of T-bill private accounts would be the political dilemma the idea create for opponents of reform. They have long railed against "raids" of the Social Security trust fund, most famously when Al Gore made the word "lockbox" a staple of late-night comedy in the 2000 presidential debates. But even before that Harry Reid, now the Senate Minority Leader, inveighed against the depletion of the trust funds by calling it "embezzlement, thievery." Former senator Ernest Hollings of South Carolina lamented the "siphoning off of every dollar of the Social Security surplus to meet current operating expenses" and said "those IOUs in the trust fund vault are a 21st-century version of Confederate banknotes." Forcing Democrats and Republicans alike to vote on a plan that actually ensures Social Security surpluses are used for retirement would be a defining moment in the debate.

Such a defining moment has happened before. In 1986, President Reagan's proposed tax reform was on its deathbed in the Senate Finance Committee as lobbyists worked to revive loophole after loophole. Facing defeat, Chairman Bob Packwood retreated with his top aide to the Irish Times bar for a lunch of burgers and beer. There Mr. Packwood decided to launch what he called a "radical plan": a top income tax rate of 25%, a full 10 points lower than any other proposal. The high-risk strategy worked, and Congress eventually passed a 28% top rate, striking a compromise that ruthlessly eliminated exemptions and raised corporate taxes. Richard Darman, then deputy Treasury secretary, hailed the Packwood move by saying it forced the hand of opponents and "re-created the sense of the possible in the American system. It is possible to be bold." He said naysayers "were brought down by the narrowness of their vision."

Today's opponents of Social Security reform have the narrowest possible vision: no reform plan of their own, and blind opposition to the idea of giving people ownership and control of any of the money they send the government for retirement. It's time for President Bush, Senate Finance Chairman Chuck Grassley and Rep. Thomas to emulate 1980s tax reformers and force opponents to confront the concept of having risk-free private accounts that lay the groundwork for an ownership society. It may be an idea whose time has come  —  this year.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor John H. Fund is author, most recently, of "Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy". (Click HERE to purchase. Sales help fund JWR.)

Comment on this column by clicking here.


04/18/05 Compassion, not compulsion
03/28/05 Selective Restraint: Libs cheered when Janet Reno defied the courts to seize Elian Gonzalez
02/28/05 High Taxes Wither Away: Former communist countries lead the way in abandoning progressivity
01/31/05 Rush for the Border: Limbaugh issues a warning to President Bush
01/24/05 If Bush wants to reform Social Security, he'll have to soften his approach to Congress 01/24/05
01/17/05 TiVo la France? Jacques Chirac wants to enter the news biz. The world won't be watching
01/10/05 A stolen election in Washington state? Not if bloggers can help it
01/03/05 The Unsung Maverick
12/27/04 All the Votes Fit to Count: Ukraine gets to revote. Why can't Washington state?
11/22/04 It's time to bring some intellectual diversity to America's colleges and universities
10/26/04 Turnout Titans: Meet the gurus of getting out the vote.
10/18/04: We May HAVA Problem: Will ‘provisional ballots’ be the new chads?
10/12/04: Getting Physical: Union thugs target Republicans
10/04/04: The Producer: Meet Mary Mapes, the crusading journalist behind CBS's current troubles
09/23/04: Ballots or Briefs? In election 2004, the man with the most lawyers may win
09/13/04: I'd Rather Be Blogging: CBS stonewalls as "guys in pajamas" uncover a fraud
08/30/04: Tryout Time: The 2008 presidential campaign gets under way in New York.
08/23/04: Why we're refighting Vietnam: Blame McCain-Feingold
08/18/04: Silence of the Lamb: C-SPAN cancels 'Booknotes'
08/16/04: Louisiana North: Why New Jersey is a pit of corruption
08/02/04: Patriotic liberalism
07/28/04: Caught in the Web: How Democrats mobilized online and other campaign tales
06/28/04: Bad ACTors: If Dems want honest elections, why did a Soros-backed group hire criminals to get out the vote?
06/21/04: This Time, Get It Right: Instead of "lawyering up," both parties should be working to prevent another Florida
06/14/04: Don't Pardon Their French: "Good government" Californians embrace the system that produced David Duke
06/07/04: Freedom's Team: How Reagan, Thatcher and John Paul II won the Cold War
05/25/04: Don't Touch That Dial? Radio hosts worry about the FCC's indecency regulations. What about political speech?
05/18/04: Anger Management: Dems start to realize that a campaign of hate won't beat President Bush
05/11/04: Will Sen. Kennedy turn out to be a political liability for John Kerry?
05/04/04: Buyer's Remorse: Dems start to worry that Kerry can't win
04/27/04: Arlen Specter's personality helps make him vulnerable in today's primary
04/20/04: Arnold Schwarzenegger thinks making laws should be a part-time job. He's right
03/23/04: Bragging of foreign support doesn't win many votes in America
03/16/04: The Vanishing Center: In both political parties, the defense of moderation is no virtue
03/09/04: A JFK-NBC Ticket? If Kerry wants to make things interesting, he'll consider Tom Brokaw for veep
03/02/04: As Virginia mulls a tax hike, all Americans should guard their wallets
02/24/04: Marriage of Inconvenience: Why same-sex nuptials make Democrats nervous
02/10/04: Republican Rot: Is Congress's GOP majority becoming as corrupt as the Democrats were?
02/03/04: Moore Trouble: Alabama's former chief justice may challenge Bush for the Religious Right vote
01/13/04: Rage of a Relic: Paul O'Neill is angry that the world has passed him by
01/06/04: Unintended Consequence: How Terry McAuliffe and James Carville created Howard Dean
09/03/03: The Anti-Dean: Why Hillary opposes the Democratic front-runner
06/27/03: The California jurist who may replace Justice O'Connor
06/02/03: Clinton the Hoover: Bill, Hillary and the Dems' political vacuum
05/27/03: Nerd Nirvana: Students are to the right of the faculty even at the U of Chicago
05/16/03: GOPers gain in the land of Humphrey and Mondale
04/28/03: With the war won, it's time for Bush to master the Senate
04/04/03: Is "diversity" on campus even a goal worth pursuing?
03/05/03: Sunday morning with the BBC
02/28/03: Shut Up, They Explained: If you can censor this, thank a teacher
02/21/03: Unmitigated Gaul: Saddam isn't the only dictator with whom Jacques Chirac is cozy
02/18/03: Growing number of black officials breaking ranks by calling for a more honest approach to race relations
01/31/03: Half and Half: Republicans have achieved parity among American voters
11/11/02: Sobering Thoughts: The GOP's cup runneth over? No, it's half empty
10/31/02: Blue Gray: California's governor answers a Nobel Prize winner with obscenities
10/14/02: Bad Hair Day: Did Montana Dems exploit antigay prejudice?
10/11/02: The kill-everything senate
09/30/02: Schroeder did what it took to win--but at what cost to Germany?
08/22/02: Buh-Bye Bob, So Long Cynthia : No amount of shouting could've saved Barr or McKinney
07/29/02: GOP: Get Over Panic --- Dems are vulnerable on corporate scandals, too
07/17/02: Not Just an Average Joe: A black GOPer may give Rep. Eliot Engel a run for his money
07/15/02: The McCain Mutiny-II
07/01/02: Opening the Schoolhouse Door: The politicians can't stop school choice now
06/20/02: The Body' Bows Out --- American politics will be duller without Jesse Ventura
06/06/02: It's time for President Bush to stand up to California's senators
05/16/02: A Court Intrigue: Procedural funny business in a racial-preference case
05/14/02: Thin moral ice: New revelations from a skater's Stasi files recall an oppressive era
05/09/02: Newark, Zimbabwe!?
05/02/02: Will Terror Leave Us No Choice? Teachers unions try to use Sept. 11 as an excuse for bad schools
04/23/02: The New Nixon? Al Gore plots his comeback
04/16/02: 'I, Uh, I Have No Comment': A union plays dirty in opposing an antitax initiative
03/31/02: Don't Just Do Something, Stand There!: Filibusters can help the Senate GOP get things done
03/14/02: Red-Light District: It's time to draw the line on gerrymandering
02/21/02: Slippery Slope: Can Dick Riordan beat California's Democratic governor?
02/14/02: Reform School: The Shays-Meehan incumbency protection act
02/07/02: Arizona Highway Robbery: Politicians make a grab for campaign cash
01/31/02: Disfranchise Lassie: Even dogs can register to vote. We need election reform with teeth
01/17/02: Dr. King's Greedy Relations: Cashing in on a national hero's legacy
01/10/02: Oil of Vitriol
01/04/02: The little engine that couldn't--and the senators who don't want it to
12/24/01: E-mail and low-cost computers could be conduits for a learning revolution
12/13/01: How Gore could have really won
12/07/01: Let our students keep their cell phones
12/04/01: Why the White House gave the RNC chairman the boot
11/12/01: A Winsome Politician: She won an election in a majority-black district--and she's a Republican
11/01/01: Bush Avoids Politics at His Peril
10/30/01: Cocked Pit: Armed pilots would mean polite skies
10/24/01: Chicken Pox: Hardly anyone has anthrax, but almost everyone has anthrax anxiety
10/11/01: Will Rush Hear Again? New technology may make it possible
10/04/01: Three Kinds of pols
08/24/01: Lauch Out: Who'll replace Jesse Helms?
08/08/01: Tome Alone: Clinton's book will probably end up on the remainder table
08/03/01: Of grubbing and grabbing: Corporation$ and local government$ perfect "public use"
07/31/01: Affairs of State: The Condit case isn't just about adultery. It's about public trust and national security
07/14/01: The First Amendment survives, and everyone has someone to blame for the failure of campaign reform
07/12/01: He's Still Bread: Despite what you've heard, Gary Condit isn't toast --- yet
07/12/01: Passing Lane: Left-wing attacks help boost John Stossel's and Brit Hume's audiences
06/25/01: Man vs. Machine: New Jersey's GOP establishment is doing everything it can to stop Bret Schundler
06/15/01: A Schundler Surprise? Don't count out "the Jack Kemp of New Jersey"
06/06/01: Memo to conservatives: Ignore McCain and maybe he'll go away
05/29/01: Integrity in Politics? Hardly. Jim Jeffords is no Wayne Morse
05/22/01: Davis' answer to California's energy crisis? Hire a couple of Clinton-Gore hatchet men
05/07/01: Prematurely declaring a winner wasn't the networks' worst sin in Florida
04/23/01: How to fix the electoral process --- REALLY!
04/11/01: A conservative hero may mount a California comeback
03/30/01: Can the GOP capture the nation's most closely balanced district?
03/09/01: Terminated
03/06/01: Leave well enough alone
02/22/01: Forgetting our heroes
02/15/01: In 1978 Clinton got a close look at the dangers of selling forgiveness
02/12/01: Clinton owes the country an explanation --- and an appology
02/06/01: How Ronald Reagan changed America
01/16/01: Why block Ashcroft? To demoralize the GOP's most loyal voters
01/15/01: Remembering John Schmitz, a cheerful extremist
12/29/00: Why are all Dems libs pickin' on me?
Dubya's 48% mandate is different than Ford's
12/13/00: Gore would have lost any recount that passed constitutional muster
11/13/00: The People Have Spoken: Will Gore listen?
10/25/00: She's really a Dodger
09/28/00: Locking up domestic oil?
09/25/00: Hillary gives new meaning to a "woman with a past"
09/21/00: Ignore the Polls. The Campaign Isn't Over Yet

©2001, John H. Fund