Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review Jan. 24, 2005 / 14 Shevat, 5765

John H. Fund

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

If Bush wants to reform Social Security, he'll have to soften his approach to Congress | As President Bush began his second term, Democrats consoled themselves with the belief they have won Round One in the battle over his plan to reform Social Security by channeling some payroll taxes into personal retirement accounts.

Democratic pollster Mark Penn opened his Georgetown home on Inauguration Day to an informal meeting of the party in exile, including Sen. Hillary Clinton and her husband, the former president. The consensus among partygoers was that Democrats were doing better at undermining the Bush Social Security plan than Republicans had been at this stage in tearing down the Clintons' 1993 attempt to re-engineer American health insurance. "This could be the comeback battle in which Democrats recover both their souls and their political energy," writes liberal columnist Robert Kuttner. "They could hand Bush a rare, humiliating defeat that breaks his winning streak and exposes Republican divisions."

The bashing of the Bush plan has begun before any details are known. Rep. Brian Baird, a Washington state Democrat, one-ups GOP critiques of traditional pay-as-you-go Social Security by labeling the idea of personal accounts "an enhanced Ponzi scheme."

"The Republicans said about Clinton's health care plan, 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it,' " another Democratic congressman told me. "It worked, so that's our message on Social Security." He didn't have to mention that Democrats, sensing blood in the water, hope to use any Bush defeat on retirement accounts to score big gains in Congress, as the GOP did in 1994.

Still, no one should bet against President Bush's ultimate success on Social Security. He has been "misunderestimated" many times before and come back to win through grit, missteps by his adversaries and a healthy dollop of luck. But his allies in Congress say he would be foolish to ignore the early warning signals on his plan. Chief among them:

Most members of his own party in Congress don't yet agree with his assessment of the problem. Many dispute his statement this month that Social Security would be "flat bust, bankrupt," unless Congress acts quickly. Rep. Gil Gutknecht, a conservative from Minnesota, says the president's rhetoric was "over the top," adding that he is "a little nervous" Mr. Bush will be criticized for "not being completely fair with the facts." "Why stir up a political hornet's nest?" chimes in Rep. Rob Simmons, a moderate Republican from a swing district in Connecticut, "When does the program go belly up? 2042. I will be dead by then."

It isn't just GOP moderates who are squeamish. At a reunion this month in Arizona of the House class of Republican revolutionaries who were swept into office after the Clinton health care debacle, there was precious little enthusiasm for tackling Social Security. Even Majority Leader Tom DeLay was skeptical about the need to put the issue on his legislative plate. "The appetite for bold moves was zero," former Rep. Randy Tate of Washington told me. "The White House needs to get its talking points  —  both political and policy  —  out soon."

The White House hasn't settled yet on a clear, simple message to sell its program. It will win only if it can make a case on why reform will benefit individual Americans. A new Time magazine poll finds that by a margin of 56% to 33% Americans still believe they would be better off with the current system than investing part of their payroll taxes in stocks and bonds. Advocates of personal accounts will have to point out that someone age 25 today is can expect a 0.68% rate of return on his Social Security payments and will face a 30% reduction in benefits upon retirement if nothing is done.

As governor of Texas, Mr. Bush was captivated by how local governments like Galveston County, with old waivers allowing them to plow the payroll taxes of local employees into private instruments, never lost a penny and instead saw courthouse janitors retire with $800,000 nest eggs. Creating that kind of "ownership society," in which people look to their own resources for more of their needs, could splinter the Democratic coalition and usher in a new area of Republican dominance. But building the political infrastructure to push such a bold concept takes time, and Democrats aren't waiting to begin their own blitzkrieg against reform.

Republicans have yet to be convinced that the transition costs of channeling some payroll taxes into personal accounts can be paid for by reducing future Social Security benefits. Newt Gingrich and former Club for Growth president Steve Moore caution against a plan under consideration by the White House that would bring the Social Security program into future balance by having benefits rise only as much as prices do, instead the current practice of having them rise as fast as wages do.

While economists of all stripes endorse such a move, it would provide Democrats with a club to attack the very concept of reform. "Any effort to change benefit formulas virtually guarantees stalemate," Mr. Gingrich told me. "If you allow them to create a slogan that includes 'benefit cuts' in it, they're going to prevail." He noted that a bill by Rep. Jim Kolbe (R., Ariz.) and ex-Rep. Charles Stenholm (D., Texas) that combined creating personal accounts with changes in future benefit formulas never attracted a third sponsor.

Democrats are determined to kill the Bush plan at all costs. True, a few, such as Sens. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Tom Carper of Delaware, have withheld criticism of Mr. Bush on Social Security till they see the details. But in the House, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has cowed all but a handful of Democrats from even considering the idea of personal accounts. "They have been told that massive ad campaigns by the AARP and George Soros will make it politically unpalatable for anyone to back private accounts, and they better not stand in the way of those who want Bush's political scalp," one Democratic House staffer told me.

Many Republicans are currently unwilling to vote for Social Security reform unless a respectable number of Democrats are willing to join them. The problem is that few moderate Democrats from swing areas remain in the House. Mr. Stenholm, now a consultant in Washington, jokes that only a "very simple bill" would currently get bipartisan support in Congress: "The Social Security Reform Act of 2005 That Does Nothing."

But it doesn't have to be so. Most Republicans in Congress understand the long-term political benefits of promoting an "ownership society" that enhances individual responsibility and looks less towards government for societal solutions. They agree with White House aide Pete Wehner, who says that reform would rank "as one of the most significant conservative governing achievements ever." If President Bush refuses to flinch, he has a good chance of having a GOP Congress follow his lead. When push comes to vote, more than a few Democrats will also end up voting for personal accounts if they seem a sure thing. Many privately admit the popularity of the idea among younger voters.

But that will happen only with the greatest of foot-dragging unless the White House changes the nature of its relationship with Republicans in Congress. From Speaker Dennis Hastert down to lowly sophomores, the Congress is filled with members of the "Bleeding Lip Club." For four years, they have all bit their lips as a "Lone Ranger" White House dictated the details of every major legislative item. The 2003 threats and strong-arm tactics that the White House ordered to push through the prescription drug bill (which ultimately had little political benefit for most members) was the last straw for some.

Mr. Bush's name will never again appear on a ballot, but congressmen's names will. and many are determined to now prove they belong to a coequal branch of government. Last week, House Ways and Means chairman Bill Thomas, who had many unhappy tussles with White House aides over the prescription drug bill, already signaled his independence by saying that Social Security reform would best be best handled by at the same time pairing it with a redesign of the nation's tax code.

Mr. Thomas's grand plan  —  which apparently would involve the introduction of an easily demagogued value-added tax  —  is probably too ambitious to pull off. But his attempt to take the lead on Social Security should tell the White House to rethink its go-it-alone legislative strategy of the last four years. What worked in a first term may be precisely the wrong approach to win over bruised members in a second term. Like it or not, if the White House really wants Social Security reform it is going to have to consult more and listen often to the members who will have to sell voters on their handiwork in 2006.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor John H. Fund is author, most recently, of "Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy". (Click HERE to purchase. Sales help fund JWR.)

Comment on this column by clicking here.


01/17/05 TiVo la France? Jacques Chirac wants to enter the news biz. The world won't be watching
01/10/05 A stolen election in Washington state? Not if bloggers can help it
01/03/05 The Unsung Maverick
12/27/04 All the Votes Fit to Count: Ukraine gets to revote. Why can't Washington state?
11/22/04 It's time to bring some intellectual diversity to America's colleges and universities
10/26/04 Turnout Titans: Meet the gurus of getting out the vote.
10/18/04: We May HAVA Problem: Will ‘provisional ballots’ be the new chads?
10/12/04: Getting Physical: Union thugs target Republicans
10/04/04: The Producer: Meet Mary Mapes, the crusading journalist behind CBS's current troubles
09/23/04: Ballots or Briefs? In election 2004, the man with the most lawyers may win
09/13/04: I'd Rather Be Blogging: CBS stonewalls as "guys in pajamas" uncover a fraud
08/30/04: Tryout Time: The 2008 presidential campaign gets under way in New York.
08/23/04: Why we're refighting Vietnam: Blame McCain-Feingold
08/18/04: Silence of the Lamb: C-SPAN cancels 'Booknotes'
08/16/04: Louisiana North: Why New Jersey is a pit of corruption
08/02/04: Patriotic liberalism
07/28/04: Caught in the Web: How Democrats mobilized online and other campaign tales
06/28/04: Bad ACTors: If Dems want honest elections, why did a Soros-backed group hire criminals to get out the vote?
06/21/04: This Time, Get It Right: Instead of "lawyering up," both parties should be working to prevent another Florida
06/14/04: Don't Pardon Their French: "Good government" Californians embrace the system that produced David Duke
06/07/04: Freedom's Team: How Reagan, Thatcher and John Paul II won the Cold War
05/25/04: Don't Touch That Dial? Radio hosts worry about the FCC's indecency regulations. What about political speech?
05/18/04: Anger Management: Dems start to realize that a campaign of hate won't beat President Bush
05/11/04: Will Sen. Kennedy turn out to be a political liability for John Kerry?
05/04/04: Buyer's Remorse: Dems start to worry that Kerry can't win
04/27/04: Arlen Specter's personality helps make him vulnerable in today's primary
04/20/04: Arnold Schwarzenegger thinks making laws should be a part-time job. He's right
03/23/04: Bragging of foreign support doesn't win many votes in America
03/16/04: The Vanishing Center: In both political parties, the defense of moderation is no virtue
03/09/04: A JFK-NBC Ticket? If Kerry wants to make things interesting, he'll consider Tom Brokaw for veep
03/02/04: As Virginia mulls a tax hike, all Americans should guard their wallets
02/24/04: Marriage of Inconvenience: Why same-sex nuptials make Democrats nervous
02/10/04: Republican Rot: Is Congress's GOP majority becoming as corrupt as the Democrats were?
02/03/04: Moore Trouble: Alabama's former chief justice may challenge Bush for the Religious Right vote
01/13/04: Rage of a Relic: Paul O'Neill is angry that the world has passed him by
01/06/04: Unintended Consequence: How Terry McAuliffe and James Carville created Howard Dean
09/03/03: The Anti-Dean: Why Hillary opposes the Democratic front-runner
06/27/03: The California jurist who may replace Justice O'Connor
06/02/03: Clinton the Hoover: Bill, Hillary and the Dems' political vacuum
05/27/03: Nerd Nirvana: Students are to the right of the faculty even at the U of Chicago
05/16/03: GOPers gain in the land of Humphrey and Mondale
04/28/03: With the war won, it's time for Bush to master the Senate
04/04/03: Is "diversity" on campus even a goal worth pursuing?
03/05/03: Sunday morning with the BBC
02/28/03: Shut Up, They Explained: If you can censor this, thank a teacher
02/21/03: Unmitigated Gaul: Saddam isn't the only dictator with whom Jacques Chirac is cozy
02/18/03: Growing number of black officials breaking ranks by calling for a more honest approach to race relations
01/31/03: Half and Half: Republicans have achieved parity among American voters
11/11/02: Sobering Thoughts: The GOP's cup runneth over? No, it's half empty
10/31/02: Blue Gray: California's governor answers a Nobel Prize winner with obscenities
10/14/02: Bad Hair Day: Did Montana Dems exploit antigay prejudice?
10/11/02: The kill-everything senate
09/30/02: Schroeder did what it took to win--but at what cost to Germany?
08/22/02: Buh-Bye Bob, So Long Cynthia : No amount of shouting could've saved Barr or McKinney
07/29/02: GOP: Get Over Panic --- Dems are vulnerable on corporate scandals, too
07/17/02: Not Just an Average Joe: A black GOPer may give Rep. Eliot Engel a run for his money
07/15/02: The McCain Mutiny-II
07/01/02: Opening the Schoolhouse Door: The politicians can't stop school choice now
06/20/02: The Body' Bows Out --- American politics will be duller without Jesse Ventura
06/06/02: It's time for President Bush to stand up to California's senators
05/16/02: A Court Intrigue: Procedural funny business in a racial-preference case
05/14/02: Thin moral ice: New revelations from a skater's Stasi files recall an oppressive era
05/09/02: Newark, Zimbabwe!?
05/02/02: Will Terror Leave Us No Choice? Teachers unions try to use Sept. 11 as an excuse for bad schools
04/23/02: The New Nixon? Al Gore plots his comeback
04/16/02: 'I, Uh, I Have No Comment': A union plays dirty in opposing an antitax initiative
03/31/02: Don't Just Do Something, Stand There!: Filibusters can help the Senate GOP get things done
03/14/02: Red-Light District: It's time to draw the line on gerrymandering
02/21/02: Slippery Slope: Can Dick Riordan beat California's Democratic governor?
02/14/02: Reform School: The Shays-Meehan incumbency protection act
02/07/02: Arizona Highway Robbery: Politicians make a grab for campaign cash
01/31/02: Disfranchise Lassie: Even dogs can register to vote. We need election reform with teeth
01/17/02: Dr. King's Greedy Relations: Cashing in on a national hero's legacy
01/10/02: Oil of Vitriol
01/04/02: The little engine that couldn't--and the senators who don't want it to
12/24/01: E-mail and low-cost computers could be conduits for a learning revolution
12/13/01: How Gore could have really won
12/07/01: Let our students keep their cell phones
12/04/01: Why the White House gave the RNC chairman the boot
11/12/01: A Winsome Politician: She won an election in a majority-black district--and she's a Republican
11/01/01: Bush Avoids Politics at His Peril
10/30/01: Cocked Pit: Armed pilots would mean polite skies
10/24/01: Chicken Pox: Hardly anyone has anthrax, but almost everyone has anthrax anxiety
10/11/01: Will Rush Hear Again? New technology may make it possible
10/04/01: Three Kinds of pols
08/24/01: Lauch Out: Who'll replace Jesse Helms?
08/08/01: Tome Alone: Clinton's book will probably end up on the remainder table
08/03/01: Of grubbing and grabbing: Corporation$ and local government$ perfect "public use"
07/31/01: Affairs of State: The Condit case isn't just about adultery. It's about public trust and national security
07/14/01: The First Amendment survives, and everyone has someone to blame for the failure of campaign reform
07/12/01: He's Still Bread: Despite what you've heard, Gary Condit isn't toast --- yet
07/12/01: Passing Lane: Left-wing attacks help boost John Stossel's and Brit Hume's audiences
06/25/01: Man vs. Machine: New Jersey's GOP establishment is doing everything it can to stop Bret Schundler
06/15/01: A Schundler Surprise? Don't count out "the Jack Kemp of New Jersey"
06/06/01: Memo to conservatives: Ignore McCain and maybe he'll go away
05/29/01: Integrity in Politics? Hardly. Jim Jeffords is no Wayne Morse
05/22/01: Davis' answer to California's energy crisis? Hire a couple of Clinton-Gore hatchet men
05/07/01: Prematurely declaring a winner wasn't the networks' worst sin in Florida
04/23/01: How to fix the electoral process --- REALLY!
04/11/01: A conservative hero may mount a California comeback
03/30/01: Can the GOP capture the nation's most closely balanced district?
03/09/01: Terminated
03/06/01: Leave well enough alone
02/22/01: Forgetting our heroes
02/15/01: In 1978 Clinton got a close look at the dangers of selling forgiveness
02/12/01: Clinton owes the country an explanation --- and an appology
02/06/01: How Ronald Reagan changed America
01/16/01: Why block Ashcroft? To demoralize the GOP's most loyal voters
01/15/01: Remembering John Schmitz, a cheerful extremist
12/29/00: Why are all Dems libs pickin' on me?
Dubya's 48% mandate is different than Ford's
12/13/00: Gore would have lost any recount that passed constitutional muster
11/13/00: The People Have Spoken: Will Gore listen?
10/25/00: She's really a Dodger
09/28/00: Locking up domestic oil?
09/25/00: Hillary gives new meaning to a "woman with a past"
09/21/00: Ignore the Polls. The Campaign Isn't Over Yet

©2001, John H. Fund