High court not as divided as lib critics might think

SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT'S FREE. (AND NO SPAM!) Just click here.

Conventional wisdom among leftist activists is that the U.S. Supreme Court has become hopelessly dominated by conservative ideologues more interested in right-wing "judicial activism" than in following the law. But this is a woefully inaccurate portrayal steeped in partisan rancor over President Donald Trump and his appointments to the court.

Progressives who favor radically overhauling the judiciary to ensure preordained rulings that accommodate their preference for an activist federal government have in recent years openly sought to undermine public confidence in the court. They attack justices — only the "conservatives" — on ethical charges and advocate for court packing or other extreme measures.

But facts are stubborn things. In reality, the number of unanimous decisions has been on the rise, undermining the thesis that the GOP-appointed justices are "an existential threat to democracy," as The New Yorker put it last year.

"The media love to play up dissent at the court," Elizabeth Slattery wrote for National Review in 2023, "especially if it can be depicted as stemming from a partisan or right–left ideological divide." But, she added, "the Supreme Court is not as divided as many in the media would have you think."

In fact, during the 2022-23 term, 48 percent of cases were decided unanimously. The number increased the following term to 55%. All three "liberal" justices were in the majority at least 80 percent of the time during the 2023-24 session.

The trend has remained steady during the current term. The justices still have a handful of cases remaining before breaking for their summer recess, many of which will indeed be contentious and include vigorous dissents. Notably, however, the court issued six decisions last week and five were unanimous. The cases addressed a few hot-button issues — gun control, religious freedom and reverse discrimination — highlighting that the justices often agree on the applicable law even on potentially controversial topics.

In fact, 6-3 rulings that break along neat political lines are rare. Even decisions with the potential to be divisive can create unusual alliances. Last year, for instance, the justices ruled 6-3 that federal prosecutors had improperly charged Jan. 6 rioters with obstruction. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a reliably liberal vote, joined the majority, and her colleague Any Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, filed a dissent.

Attacks on the legitimacy of the Supreme Court are attacks on an independent judiciary, a cornerstone of a democratic republic. But they're even more insidious when they're based on partisan and false narrative of dysfunction and judicial impropriety.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Previously:
• Carbon, crops for cows and the Colorado River
• OOPS! Blue states finding 'free' health care can get expensive
• Extend the president's 2017 income tax reform bill
• Extend the president's 2017 income tax reform bill
• The Left's hypocrisy on the plight of Gazan civilians
• Trump's tariff pause presents an opportunity
• Trump ruffles feathers on elections
• Chuck Schumer wants more of your hard-earned money
• GOP must rediscover importance of judicial review
• And about those Medicaid 'cuts'
• White House transparency should extend to records
• Credit card bill will hurt those it's supposed to help
• Socialism surprise? Universal basic income fails yet another test
• The irony of the push for 'media literacy' in schools
• Revealing True Trump
• Biden Billions for virtually nothing
• Federal court puts an end to 'net neutrality' nonsense
• Dems still remain in deep denial over election defeat
• Syria's dictator falls victim to Hamas' grave miscalculation
• Gerrymandering for me, but not for thee
• Many seeds sowed Trump's return to the White House
• Harris-Biden again embolden Iran's proxy terrorists
• Kam can't run from Biden's many messes
• Courts rebuke Biden's Title IX rewrite
• Biden cover-up mirrors previous Dem efforts to deceive
• Irony alert: Biden warns Trump
• Stop hiding the Hur tapes
• The rich pay more than their 'fair share' of taxes
• 'Most predictable crisis' in history continuing as predicted
• Don't feed the pander-bear
• 'Grading for equity' leads to less learning
• Report again highlights need for entitlement reform
• Wage law is good news for . .. the robots
• Joe Biden should commit to presidential debates
• Biden tax plan would pummel average Americans
• Iran's brazen attack on Israel was 'utterly unsuccessful'
• More free stuff
• Biden proposes another massive spending spree
• Dems increasingly desperate over No Labels
• Biden hams it up during stemwinder
• Economies roar in red states
• To establish 'absolute tyranny over these States'
• Biden condemns himself in attack on shrinkflation
• If only Taylor Swift were dating the national debt
• Biden bows to Putin, environmentalists
• Defenders of 'democracy' want Voter ID off ballot
• 'No one is safe if they had any hand in' Oct. 7
• Biden infrastructure bill: A failure to launch
• US government revenues hit record highs
• Why Biden can't convince voters he's beat inflation
• Why Biden can't convince voters he's beat inflation
• Biden needs to stop the mixed messages
• The hating class as brave defenders
• Blinken only emboldens Hamas terrorists
• White House green Slush fund throwing around cash
• Biden immigration policies souring even Dems
• Dems fret as the bad news mounts for Biden
• Billions in coronavirus money still sitting around
• Senate delegation reassures Israel; where's the House?
• Senate delegation reassures Israel; where's the House?
• Chicago takes victim blaming to an absurd new low
• The utter failure of money to improve education
• Group identity drives American division
• The downside of Biden's drug price control scheme
• WARNING: Here's why top insurers are fleeing
• 'They even laughed in my face'
• Red states power Biden's economy
• 'If you have private insurance, you can' … OOPS!
• Ignoring the Bill of Rights when its convenient
• Hunter cops a plea --- but the Biden probes continue
• Will we every truly know the depth of pandemic fraud?
• Hello there, Big Brother! Please, come right in
• Its not perfect, but it's a start on immigration reform
• IRS wants to branch out
• Gas stove ban conspiracy theory comes true
• Biden's busy bureaucrats beef up regulatory state
• Don't even dare think of emulamating New Yawk!
• Where have all the nation's college students gone?
• Soft-on-crime policies hit hard wall of political reality
• Joe Biden and Monty Python is no comedy
• Global warming was supposed to wreak havoc on polar bears. Looks like someone forgot to tell the polar bears