Socialism surprise? Universal basic income fails yet another test

SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT'S FREE. (AND NO SPAM!) Just click here.

There's a reason that ideas from the progressive ivory tower need to be tested. Often, the grandest theories fall apart when exposed to the rigors of the real world.

Consider the case of universal basic income, which is all the rage among many Democrats. The government would provide every individual with a monthly check. Proponents believe this would help people cover basic expenses, such as food and housing. This is supposed to reduce income "inequality" and better equip individuals to take financial risks, such as starting a business or taking a new job.

In 2022, the idea was floated in Reno as a way to combat high housing costs. In the 2020 presidential race, Andrew Yang made waves in the Democratic primary by pushing UBI. He claimed his proposal would "enable all Americans to pay their bills, educate themselves (and) start businesses." In 2018, former President Barack Obama suggested considering "a universal income."

As part of this push, there have been at least 150 UBI pilot programs around the country, although none in Nevada. Last November, a working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research looked at a two-year program in Compton, California. Almost 700 households received around $500 a month for two years. Another 1,402 households were in the control group.

There was some moderately good news for UBI supporters. "Average non-housing debt balances declined by $2,190 over 18 months relative to the control group, although the drop is not statistically significant," the paper found.

But even that isn't particularly impressive. Over 18 months, those households would have received about $9,000. Not a good return on investment.

While full-time workers didn't stop working when receiving the handout, part-time workers did. "Part-time workers (at baseline) had lower labor market participation by 13 percentage points. Income (excluding the transfer) was reduced by $333 per month on average relative to control households," the paper said.

In other words, UBI enabled many recipients to work less. There is scant evidence of people using the money to educate themselves or start businesses. It's more likely UBI will increase time spent on leisure activities such as playing video games than turn a recipient into an entrepreneur.

There's a more fundamental problem with UBI. There is dignity in work. Components of a government safety net shouldn't promote increased dependency. The goal should be to help the less fortunate, while providing incentives for them to become self-sufficient. A universal basic income does the opposite. It's a bad idea.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Previously:
• The irony of the push for 'media literacy' in schools
• Revealing True Trump
• Biden Billions for virtually nothing
• Federal court puts an end to 'net neutrality' nonsense
• Dems still remain in deep denial over election defeat
• Syria's dictator falls victim to Hamas' grave miscalculation
• Gerrymandering for me, but not for thee
• Many seeds sowed Trump's return to the White House
• Harris-Biden again embolden Iran's proxy terrorists
• Kam can't run from Biden's many messes
• Courts rebuke Biden's Title IX rewrite
• Biden cover-up mirrors previous Dem efforts to deceive
• Irony alert: Biden warns Trump
• Stop hiding the Hur tapes
• The rich pay more than their 'fair share' of taxes
• 'Most predictable crisis' in history continuing as predicted
• Don't feed the pander-bear
• 'Grading for equity' leads to less learning
• Report again highlights need for entitlement reform
• Wage law is good news for . .. the robots
• Joe Biden should commit to presidential debates
• Biden tax plan would pummel average Americans
• Iran's brazen attack on Israel was 'utterly unsuccessful'
• More free stuff
• Biden proposes another massive spending spree
• Dems increasingly desperate over No Labels
• Biden hams it up during stemwinder
• Economies roar in red states
• To establish 'absolute tyranny over these States'
• Biden condemns himself in attack on shrinkflation
• If only Taylor Swift were dating the national debt
• Biden bows to Putin, environmentalists
• Defenders of 'democracy' want Voter ID off ballot
• 'No one is safe if they had any hand in' Oct. 7
• Biden infrastructure bill: A failure to launch
• US government revenues hit record highs
• Why Biden can't convince voters he's beat inflation
• Why Biden can't convince voters he's beat inflation
• Biden needs to stop the mixed messages
• The hating class as brave defenders
• Blinken only emboldens Hamas terrorists
• White House green Slush fund throwing around cash
• Biden immigration policies souring even Dems
• Dems fret as the bad news mounts for Biden
• Billions in coronavirus money still sitting around
• Senate delegation reassures Israel; where's the House?
• Senate delegation reassures Israel; where's the House?
• Chicago takes victim blaming to an absurd new low
• The utter failure of money to improve education
• Group identity drives American division
• The downside of Biden's drug price control scheme
• WARNING: Here's why top insurers are fleeing
• 'They even laughed in my face'
• Red states power Biden's economy
• 'If you have private insurance, you can' … OOPS!
• Ignoring the Bill of Rights when its convenient
• Hunter cops a plea --- but the Biden probes continue
• Will we every truly know the depth of pandemic fraud?
• Hello there, Big Brother! Please, come right in
• Its not perfect, but it's a start on immigration reform
• IRS wants to branch out
• Gas stove ban conspiracy theory comes true
• Biden's busy bureaucrats beef up regulatory state
• Don't even dare think of emulamating New Yawk!
• Where have all the nation's college students gone?
• Soft-on-crime policies hit hard wall of political reality
• Joe Biden and Monty Python is no comedy
• Global warming was supposed to wreak havoc on polar bears. Looks like someone forgot to tell the polar bears