Contact The Editor
Articles By This Author
Recent Supreme Court rulings protecting Americans from bureaucratic excesses are now bearing fruit. Last week, a federal appeals court put an end to the stale "net neutrality" debate by ruling that the FCC exceeded its power by attempting to regulate internet providers as utilities under a law dating back to the Depression.
In the opinion, a three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cited a high court ruling last year that held the courts no longer should defer to federal agencies when they interpret laws to maximize their power. Simply put, the judges found, "The FCC lacks the statutory authority to impose its desired net neutrality policies."
This means net neutrality supporters will have to persuade Congress to act to move their agenda rather than rely on functionaries making de facto law by rewriting statutes. That's how a system of checks and balances functions.
Because there aren't enough votes in Congress to shackle broadband providers with all the regulations that progressives favor, the issue is likely dead. But it's worth revisiting, if only for educational purposes.
Recall that the FCC under Barack Obama used a creative reading of an 80-year-old law to allow regulators to treat internet service providers as public utilities. Democrats argued that the heavy hand of federal intervention was the only way to promote a "free and open" internet and to prevent greedy tech corporations from bleeding American consumers. Never mind the decades of history proving how an overactive regulatory apparatus actually harms consumers by stifling creativity, investment and innovation.
Two years later, a new FCC chief under President Donald Trump rescinded the "net neutrality" rules. Hysteria ensued from the left. A GQ headline warned the move would "ruin the internet forever." Nancy Pelosi warned that the change put "democracy," "entrepreneurialism" and "American businesses" at risk.
Suffice it to say that none of these progressive prognosticators will be confused with Nostradamus. Yet Joe Biden's FCC in April resurrected "net neutrality" under the guise of protecting consumers. The appeals court ruling strikes down that effort.
"This decision not only preserves the light-touch framework that has driven unprecedented internet growth since 2017 but also sends a clear message: federal agencies must respect the boundaries of their statutory authority, leaving sweeping policy changes to Congress where they belong," Lindsay Mark Lewis wrote last week for the Progressive Policy Institute.
The absence of aggressive regulation has not led to the disaster liberal activists predicted, Mr. Lewis added. On the contrary, "The internet's strength has always been its adaptability. Today's challenge is to nurture that resilience, not smother it in outdated regulation."
Alas, this is a lesson that too many Democrats simply prefer to ignore.
(COMMENT, BELOW)
Previously:
• Dems still remain in deep denial over election defeat
• Syria's dictator falls victim to Hamas' grave miscalculation
• Gerrymandering for me, but not for thee
• Many seeds sowed Trump's return to the White House
• Harris-Biden again embolden Iran's proxy terrorists
• Kam can't run from Biden's many messes
• Courts rebuke Biden's Title IX rewrite
• Biden cover-up mirrors previous Dem efforts to deceive
• Irony alert: Biden warns Trump
• Stop hiding the Hur tapes
• The rich pay more than their 'fair share' of taxes
• 'Most predictable crisis' in history continuing as predicted
•
Don't feed the pander-bear
•
'Grading for equity' leads to less learning
•
Report again highlights need for entitlement reform
•
Wage law is good news for . .. the robots
•
Joe Biden should commit to presidential debates
•
Biden tax plan would pummel average Americans
•
Iran's brazen attack on Israel was 'utterly unsuccessful'
•
More free stuff
•
Biden proposes another massive spending spree
•
Dems increasingly desperate over No Labels
•
Biden hams it up during stemwinder
•
Economies roar in red states
•
To establish 'absolute tyranny over these States'
•
Biden condemns himself in attack on shrinkflation
•
If only Taylor Swift were dating the national debt
•
Biden bows to Putin, environmentalists
•
Defenders of 'democracy' want Voter ID off ballot
•
'No one is safe if they had any hand in' Oct. 7
•
Biden infrastructure bill: A failure to launch
•
US government revenues hit record highs
•
Why Biden can't convince voters he's beat inflation
•
Why Biden can't convince voters he's beat inflation
•
Biden needs to stop the mixed messages
•
The hating class as brave defenders
•
Blinken only emboldens Hamas terrorists
•
White House green Slush fund throwing around cash
•
Biden immigration policies souring even Dems
•
Dems fret as the bad news mounts for Biden
•
Billions in coronavirus money still sitting around
•
Senate delegation reassures Israel; where's the House?
•
Senate delegation reassures Israel; where's the House?
•
Chicago takes victim blaming to an absurd new low
•
The utter failure of money to improve education
•
Group identity drives American division
•
The downside of Biden's drug price control scheme
•
WARNING: Here's why top insurers are fleeing
•
'They even laughed in my face'
•
Red states power Biden's economy
•
'If you have private insurance, you can' … OOPS!
•
Ignoring the Bill of Rights when its convenient
•
Hunter cops a plea --- but the Biden probes continue
• Will we every truly know the depth of pandemic fraud?
• Hello there, Big Brother! Please, come right in
• Its not perfect, but it's a start on immigration reform
• IRS wants to branch out
• Gas stove ban conspiracy theory comes true
• Biden's busy bureaucrats beef up regulatory state
• Don't even dare think of emulamating New Yawk!
• Where have all the nation's college students gone?
• Soft-on-crime policies hit hard wall of political reality
• Joe Biden and Monty Python is no comedy
• Global warming was supposed to wreak havoc on polar bears. Looks like someone forgot to tell the polar bears