Jewish World Review June 24, 2003 / 24 Sivan, 5763
Leonard Pitts, Jr.
Three strikes and your (computer) is out?
Orrin Hatch wants to blow up your computer.
Well, OK, he didn't say ''blow up'' exactly. The actual verb was ''destroy.'' So I guess he'd be just as happy to see it melted into a steaming plastic heap or dropped from the top of a very tall building. The main point is that your computer ceases to exist.
And yeah, somebody obviously got into his ear right after he said it and whispered, ''Senator, you really can't go around destroying people's computers.'' So that a day later he backtracked, kinda sorta, claiming that when he said destroy computers, he didn't really mean destroy computers. But you just know that deep down in his heart of hearts, the Republican from Utah wants to run over your computer with a dump truck.
For which he has my sympathy, if not my vote.
Yeah, I know. Context. You want context. Fine, I got your context right here.
Hatch made his comments last week during a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee looking into Internet piracy of movies and music. Randy Saaf of MediaDefender, an L.A. company whose technology is used to fight Internet theft, was testifying.
''No one is interested in destroying anyone's computer,'' he said at one point.
To which Hatch replied, ''I'm interested.'' He suggested a system under which people who illegally download copyrighted material would receive two warnings. On the third strike, their computer would be trashed, presumably by some virus that eats the hard drive.
''If we can find some way to do this without destroying their machines, we'd be interested in hearing about that,'' Hatch said. "If that's the only way, then I'm all for destroying their machines.''
Wreck a few hundred thousand computers, he said, and maybe people would think twice about their actions. Does one really want to risk a $2,500 machine to avoid paying $19.95 for a DVD of Spider-Man?
Of course, you can't just go around nuking people's computers. There are laws against that. And Hatch is hardly a disinterested observer here. To the contrary, the senator is a moderately successful songwriter; he has a tune on a recent Gladys Knight CD, in fact.
Still, one does not have to have money at stake to be appalled by the $7.2 billion annual loss sustained by the music and movie industries as a result of the traffic in purloined product. Nor does one have to receive a check from those industries to be disgusted by the sense of smug entitlement and smarmy self-justification with which so many computer shoplifters -- for that's what they are -- go about downloading entertainment they haven't paid for.
It's one thing -- both legally and morally -- to make a copy of a favorite CD for private use. It's quite another to post it on the Internet for the use of a million of your closest friends.
But this has become quite the common occurrence. The sense seems to be that it's a victimless crime or, to the degree there is a victim, it's only the filthy-rich greed heads who run the film and music industries. So why not enjoy free movies and music?
The problem with that logic is neon. You have to be awfully young, awfully naive or awfully both, to believe in free anything. Or to think creative industries sustaining multibillion-dollar losses will not balance the books by taking fewer risks on edgy or unproven fare.
So there is a victim here. It's the consumer. You and me.
It's also the society itself. How morally blinkered are we when it becomes necessary to defend the premise that theft is wrong?
But we have indeed reached that point. Just a few weeks ago, a young woman, spotting the MP3 player clipped to my hip, asked if I downloaded music. When I told her that every song in the player came from a CD I owned, she made a face. ''Oh,'' she said, "you must have a moral objection.''
It was the tone you'd take with a slow child.
So right now I'm thinking, OK, we can't destroy everybody's computers. Fine. Can we at least destroy hers?
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR contributor Leonard Pitts, Jr.'s column by clicking here.
06/06/03: Misplaced sympathies
06/03/03: Nothing hazy in kids' assaults
05/27/03: Black? African-American? Colored?
05/20/03: Two words not spoken often enough among blacks: I do
05/07/03: Spambusters should start with the Africans
04/29/03: The man behind Motown's moves
04/22/03: OH, MOHAMMED, YOU ARE THE BEST!
04/21/03: In war - any war - there are going to be Alis
04/11/03: Amid the ruins, a blessing
04/08/03: Truth during war seen through prism
03/25/03: Perspective on life and freedom
03/18/03: 'Sacre Bleu!' Let Freedom Ring
03/14/03: Yes, Virginia, there is a way to determine the truth
03/11/03: A statement that fits to a 'T'
03/07/03: Driven to madness
03/04/03: Not an appreciation of Mr. Rogers
02/28/03: When TV picks at rural poor, viewers are left with even less
02/14/03: We've been through anxious times like these before
02/11/03: Virtual community failed "Ripper' is no surprise
02/07/03: 'The One' for the 'Get-Yours' generation
02/04/03: Depressing news from TV nation
01/31/03: Let's hear it for women with meat on their bones
01/21/03: Illinois governor may have saved us from ourselves
01/14/03: We must pay close attention as corners are cut and rights abridged in our names
01/10/03: This mother wouldn't let us ignore grisly ugliness of racism
12/17/02: Michael Jackson's disappearing act
12/06/02: After affirmative action, what next?
12/03/02: We deserve a break today from McDonald's lawsuits
11/19/02: On question of Megan's Law, information trumps other concerns
11/12/02: Winona, just say, 'I'm sorry'
11/08/02: Your local police, brought to you by Joe's Bar and Grill
11/05/02: A father, a son and an essay
10/29/02: Things like this don't happen
10/22/02: Real monsters look just like women and men
10/18/02: Snoop's new tune rings hollow
10/15/02: A reminder of life's random cruelty
10/08/02: He toils in the name of change because he can't just stand by
10/01/02: Sharpton, crossing swords with the white corporate dragon, needs to learn what the civil rights movement really was about
09/25/02: A skewed sense of compassion
09/18/02: On death and a pop-culture mindset
09/10/02: Inconvenience me, PLEASE!
09/06/02: Latest CBS joke isn't funny
09/03/02: A rewarding life as a working stiff
08/30/02: We infants in men's clothing
08/27/02: Sept. 11 - How much is too much?
08/23/02: Cut it out already, media!
08/20/02: Brace yourself for attacks of the stealth ads
08/16/02: Russia, please, pretty please let the rocker hitch a ride into space
08/12/02: Racial 'colorblindness' is silly
07/30/02: Oh, to be famous
07/19/02: In Pop-Music Thriller, Jacko Takes on Sony
07/09/02: The password is 'frustration'
06/25/02: My Head And Heart Are At Odds - I Can't Watch Video Of Pearl's Beheading
06/21/02: Your kid's going to pay for cheating --- eventually
06/18/02: Stuffy 'correctness' robs races of give and take
06/07/02: A gift of the Masai
06/04/02: Now what? Use your 9/11 pain to combat complacency
05/24/02: Has your life changed since 9/11?
05/19/02: New world disorder is nothing to smile about
05/14/02: White men can jump, so why do black kids come up short in the classroom?
05/03/02: Catholic Church should be ashamed for blaming abuse victims
04/19/02: A reminder of how small the world has become
04/16/02: 100 death-penalty mistakes and counting
04/12/02: Until all the bad guys wear black hats
04/10/02: Connecting with history with hope for future
04/08/02: Just me and the boys: A black father's road trip
03/26/02: It's time to give up fighting the good fight and join the masses
03/22/02: It's not the art, it's the artist who's troubling
03/19/02: Don't ask, don't tell when it comes to police work
03/15/02: Do we have an inalienable right to TV?
03/12/02: What will we learn about ourselves as war toll grows?
03/08/02: Marriage madness --- oh, please!
03/05/02: A risk free life
03/01/02: Pentagon's idea of lying to media was breathtaking' in its stupidity
02/16/02: Will the Afghans forgive the U.S. for the beating of innocents?
02/15/02: In search of manhood, some make a fatal decision
02/08/02: Time for blacks to give the same respect they demand
02/05/02: A question of character and "unlawful combatants"
01/31/02: There's only so much a parent can influence a child
01/29/02: Mike Tyson is incapable of embarrassment
01/25/02: Acts of patriotism or acts of desecration?
01/18/02: Waiting for tears in the rain at Ground Zero
01/15/02: A little cultural respect works both ways
01/11/02: Can blacks be racist?
01/07/02: What price for the priceless?
12/21/01: An intriguing study on race
12/18/01: To err is me
12/14/01: Admit it, folks, If you've ever been 16, you can probably relate to Walker
12/11/01: Blacks-on-blacks poll is a healthy project
12/07/01: The best defense against government excesses
12/05/01: Better hoist caution flag
12/03/01: Martin Luther Ka-CHING!
11/27/01: Beauty reflects an ugly truth
11/22/01: Another reason to be thankful
11/19/01: If only they knew our names
11/12/01: Watching a 'dying' man live
08/01/01: Should a man be put in jail for what he's thinking?
07/27/01: It's your responsibility to invade their privacy
07/20/01: Is optimism for fools?
07/17/01: Everybody should have a white man
© 2002, The Miami Herald